Table 3

Baseline Characteristics by Number of Follow-Up Visits (N = 2,160)

CharacteristicFollow-Up Visits, No. (%)OverallFollow-Up Visits: 0 vs ≥1Missing Data, No.
0 (n = 1,123)1 (n = 612)2 (n = 225)≥3 (n = 200)P Valueχ2P Valueχ2
Categorical variables
Sex2.89.410.15.70814
 Female524 (50.7)274 (26.5)113 (10.9)123 (11.9)
 Male162 (51.9)91 (29.2)25 (8.0)34 (10.9)
Language0.98.810.09.760
 English683 (52.3)375 (28.7)130 (9.9)119 (9.1)
 Spanish440 (51.6)237 (27.8)95 (11.1)81 (9.5)
Race39.68<.00122.73<.0011,471
 African American74 (49.3)46 (30.7)17 (11.3)13 (8.7)
 White168 (45.9)93 (25.4)57 (15.6)48 (13.1)
 American Indian or Native Alaskan20 (58.8)10 (29.4)0 (0.0)4 (11.8)
 Other96 (69.1)33 (23.7)8 (5.8)2 (1.4)
Ethnicity3.42.330.66.421,436
 Hispanic233 (46.5)123 (24.5)67 (13.4)78 (15.6)
 Non-Hispanic111 (49.8)62 (27.8)23 (10.3)27 (12.1)
Alcohol screen2.49.480.02.891,080
 Negative423 (53.3)204 (25.7)78 (9.8)89 (11.2)
 Positive151 (52.8)75 (26.2)21 (7.3)39 (13.6)
Drug screen4.23.243.91.051,080
 Negative478 (51.9)243 (26.4)86 (9.3)114 (12.4)
 Positive96 (60.4)36 (22.6)13 (8.2)14 (8.8)
Follow-up105.24.00013.81<.060
 MBC Pharm T/t637 (45.5)423 (30.2)177 (12.6)163 (11.6)
 Behavioral T/t142 (63.4)44 (19.6)16 (7.2)22 (9.8)
 Active Surveillance113 (64.9)45 (25.9)9 (5.2)7 (4.0)
 No follow-up27 (84.4)3 (9.4)2 (6.2)0 (0.0)
 External Referral94 (68.1)37 (36.8)4 (2.9)3 (2.2)
 Refused T/t110 (57.3)60 (31.3)17 (8.8)5 (2.6)
Continuous variablesMean (SD)Mean (SD)Mean (SD)Mean (SD)FP ValueFP Value
PHQ-915.33 (5.46)15.82 (5.38)16.76 (5.23)17.15 (4.90)9.46<.00125.45<.0010
GAD-711.93 (5.76)11.98 (5.90)12.74 (5.48)13.7 (5.24)6.15<.00110.73.001142
P-FIBS16.5 (9.44)15.81 (9.53)17.67 (8.58)14.98 (9.29)1.94.130.37.551,044
Age41.72 (14.78)43.53 (14.58)43.95 (12.56)42.61 (13.04)2.92.046.12.020
  • T/t = treatment; PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item; GAD-7 = generalized anxiety disorder 7 item scale; P-FIBS = pain frequency, intensity, and burden scale.

  • The F statistic is a ratio of variation among the group means to the total variation within the samples and large values of the statistic imply larger differences among the group means.