Table 2.

Sufficiently Important Difference (SID) Severity Benefit by Interview Method and Treatment Scenario Type

CharacteristicIntakeExitTelephoneIntake + Telephone
CI = confidence interval.
Note: data distributions tended to skew to the negative (6 of 8 had mean values of ≤ 50%).
No. of interviews9191162253
Jackson score, mean (SD)9.7 (3.6)1.5 (2.6)9.6 (3.7)9.6 (3.7)
Unadjusted mean SID
    Overall (SD)0.40 (0.20)0.41 (0.16)0.40 (0.17)0.40 (0.18)
    95% CI0.38–0.440.36–0.440.37–0.430.38–0.42
Accepting, regardless of severity benefit, % (SD)15.9 (0.37)17.6 (0.38)15.3 (0.36)15.5 (0.36)
Refusing, regardless of severity benefit, % (SD)12.6 (0.33)15.4 (0.36)14.5 (0.35)13.8 (0.35)
VitaminHerbal ExtractLozengeAntiviral
Unadjusted mean SID
    Sick groups, No. (SD)0.25 (0.22)0.32 (0.24)0.47 (0.26)0.57 (0.30)
    95% CI0.23–0.270.30–0.340.43–0.510.53–0.61
Accepting, regardless of severity benefit, % (SD)30.4 (46.1)15.4 (36.2)4.7 (21.3)4.7 (21.3)
Refusing, regardless of severity benefit, % (SD)3.1 (17.5)7.1 (25.8)14.6 (35.4)37.2 (48.4)
Group and Jackson score, adjusted SID
    Sick groups (SD)0.23 (0.22)0.31 (0.38)0.49 (0.45)0.63 (0.50)
    95% CI0.19–0.270.27–0.350.43–0.550.56–0.69