Estimated Rates of Colonoscopy Quality Outcomes Using Random Effects Modeling
| Study, Year | Estimated Adenoma Detection Rate (95% CI) | Estimated Adenocarcinoma Detection Rate (95% CI) | Estimated Reach-the-Cecum Rate (All Patients) (95% CI) | Perforationsa | Bleeding Not Requiring Transfusiona |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CI=confidence intervals. | |||||
| Note: rates and 95% CIs calculated using random effect model. | |||||
| a Raw data shown. | |||||
| b Additional information about this study was provided by the author. | |||||
| Godreau,24 1992 | 51.7 (44.0– 59.3) | 2.2 (0.9– 5.7) | 83.2 (76.6– 88.2) | 0 | 0 |
| Rodney et al,25 1993 | 8.8 (6.1– 12.5) | 2.0 (0.9– 4.2) | 48.7 (43.1– 54.4) | 0 | 0 |
| Hopper et al,26 1996 | 43.7 (40.7– 46.7) | Not reported | 74.8 (72.1– 77.3) | 0 | 0 |
| Harper et al27, 1997 | 20.9 (16.8– 25.8) | 3.5 (2.0– 6.1) | 87.1 (82.9– 90.4) | 0 | 0 |
| Pierzchajio et al,28 1997 | 24.7 (21.7– 27.9) | 0.6 (0.3– 1.4) | 91.4 (89.2– 93.2) | 0 | 0 |
| Carr et al,29 1998 | 33.4 (27.9– 39.5) | 1.9 (0.8– 4.2) | 82.2 (77.0– 86.4) | 0 | 1 |
| Kirby,30 2004 | 16.8 (14.0– 19.9) | 2.3 (1.4– 3.8) | 80.1 (76.8– 83.1) | 0 | 0 |
| Edwards and Norris,31 2004 | 22.8 (17.6– 29.0) | 2.3 (1.0– 5.2) | 96.1 (92.4– 98.0) | 0 | 0 |
| Newman et al,32 2005 | 32.5 (29.2– 36.0) | 0.9 (0.5– 1.9) | 92.7 (90.6– 94.4) | 0 | 1 |
| Strayer,33 2005b | 51.3 (45.1– 57.3) | 0.8 (0.3– 2.6) | 94.6 (91.1– 96.7) | 0 | 0 |
| Cotterill et al,34 2005 | 23.9 (19.6– 28.8) | 0.7 (0.2– 2.2) | 94.0 (90.9– 96.1) | 0 | 0 |
| Lloyd,35 2006b | 38.0 (37.2– 38.8) | 5.0 (4.6– 5.4) | 98.4 (98.2– 98.6) | 3 | 2 |
| Total | 28.9 (20.4– 39.3) | 1.7 (0.9– 3.0) | 89.2 (80.1– 94.4) | 3 | 4 |