Table 1.

Characteristics of the Included Studies, With Nerve Conduction Study as Reference Standard

CharacteristicLee, 200314a,bPerkins, 200115a,cShin, 200019d
CI=confidence interval; QUADAS = Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies, LR = likelihood ratio; MT = metatarsal, NR = not reported.
a QUADAS limitation: selection criteria not clearly described.
b QUADAS limitation: test results possibly not interpreted without knowledge of the other test results.
c QUADAS limitation: withdrawals from study not clearly explained.
d QUADAS limitation: execution of index test and reference standard not described in sufficient detail.
Participants n (% women)37 (46)478 (34)126 (54)
Age, mean, y595458
PopulationUnselected type 2 diabetic outpatients in Pusan, Koreaa. 426 Unselected diabetic patients attending secondary and tertiary diabetic clinics, and recruited through advertisements
 b. 52 Nondiabetic reference subjects in Toronto General Hospital/University Health Network, CanadaConsecutive diabetic patients referred to a secondary foot clinic in Seoul, Korea
Methods of monofilament testing
    Sites, No. and Location10, Dorsal between base digit 1–2; ventral digit 1,3,5; MT heads 1,3,5; medial and lateral midfoot; heel1, HalluxNR
    Threshold≥ 5 of 10 incorrect (1 foot)a. ≥ 5 of 8 incorrect (both feet)
 b. ≥ 2 of 8 incorrect (both feet)NR
Sensitivity (95% CI)93.1 (0.77–0.99)a. 40.9 (0.36–0.46)
 b. 77.0 (0.72–0.81)56.7 (0.44–0.69)
Specificity (95% CI)100.0 (0.63–1.00)a. 96.2 (0.90–0.99)
 b. 68.3 (0.58–0.77)94.9 (0.86–0.99)
LR+ (95% CI)16.5 (1.1–245.0)a. 10.6 (4.0–28.0)
 b. 2.4 (1.8–3.2)11.2 (4.0–34.0)
LR– (95% CI)0.07 (0.02–0.26)a. 0.61 (0.56–0.67)
 b. 0.34 (0.27–0.42)0.46 (0.35–0.60)