Table 3

Summary Statistics on Care by Design Implementation, Patient Satisfaction, Clinician Satisfaction, and Financial Data in 2011

VariableScore, Mean (SD)
CBD implementationa
 Same-day access2.22 (0.94)
 Primary care clinician continuity2.62 (0.81)
 Response to messages0.99 (0.46)
 Abandonment rate3.00 (0.47)
 TSF (% of calls answered within standard)2.00 (0.94)
 Patients signed up for MyChartb1.89 (1.14)
 Use X-filec2.53 (1.16)
 Physical template1.97 (1.20)
 Best Practice Alerts0.78 (0.59)
 Standardized examination rooms3.28 (0.74)
 Efficient visit2.71 (0.73)
 Huddles2.29 (1.46)
 Blood drawn in room2.98 (1.56)
 Continuity of MA in visit3.27 (0.61)
 MA engagement in visit2.38 (0.62)
 Documentation of patient communication needs1.92 (1.27)
 Presence of advance directives0.08 (0.13)
 Depression screening0.24 (0.24)
 List of community resources2.53 (1.35)
 Efficient communication among team3.75 (0.29)
 Registries0.37 (0.77)
 Labs done prior to visit2.03 (0.64)
 After-Visit Summary given0.77 (0.70)
 Medication reconciliation2.55 (0.58)
 Procedure/consult notes available at follow-up visit3.57 (0.44)
 Care plan documented0.12 (0.17)
 Progress on care plan documented0.34 (0.24)
 Contact patients after hospital discharge0.03 (0.07)
 Overall scores
  Planned care1.08 (0.21)
  Care team2.41 (0.36)
  Access2.12 (0.30)
  Implementation1.94 (0.20)
Quality measures
 Patients prescribed antiplatelet therapy0.78 (0.05)
 Patients prescribed drug therapy for LDL-C0.87 (0.03)
 Patients with prior MI who were prescribed β-blocker0.72 (0.06)
 Lipid profile0.63 (0.08)
 CAD patients with LDL-C <100 mg/dL0.65 (0.06)
 Patients who have LVSD and/or diabetes and were prescribed ACE inhibitor/ARB0.86 (0.06)
 HbA1c testing0.78 (0.05)
 HbA1c <9%0.59 (0.05)
 Blood pressure <140/80 mm Hg0.56 (0.05)
 LDL-C testing0.70 (0.04)
 Diabetic patients with LDL-C <100 mg/dL0.36 (0.06)
 Urine protein testing0.86 (0.02)
 Eye examination0.14 (0.07)
 Foot examination0.48 (0.10)
 Patients who had LVF assessment ever0.63 (0.13)
 Patients who were provided HF education in past year0.08 (0.06)
 Patients with AF who were prescribed warfarin0.91 (0.08)
 Breast cancer screening0.46 (0.08)
 Colon cancer screening0.46 (0.08)
 Patients aged ≥50 y who received influenza vaccination during Sep-Feb0.35 (0.04)
 Pneumonia vaccination0.77 (0.05)
Patient satisfactiond
 Wait time in clinic0.49 (0.10)
 Friendliness/courtesy of the clinician0.83 (0.05)
 Explanations the clinician gave you about your problem or condition0.79 (0.05)
 Information the clinician gave you about medications0.77 (0.03)
 Follow-up instructions0.75 (0.03)
 Amount of time the clinician spent with you0.75 (0.05)
 Likelihood to recommend0.80 (0.04)
 Overall satisfaction0.71 (0.05)
Clinician satisfactiond
 Morale of your group0.16 (0.18)
 Quality of care dimension (questions 14–18)0.39 (0.14)
 Quality of care you are able to provide0.45 (0.23)
 Time spent working dimension (questions 20–24)0.16 (0.14)
 Time you work0.13 (0.14)
 Time you spend with patient0.16 (0.11)
 Volume of patient load is reasonable0.17 (0.18)
 Patient interaction dimension (questions 26–29)0.35 (0.10)
 Relationship with patients0.79 (0.14)
 Continuity of care you are able to provide0.38 (0.26)
 Relationships with staff dimension (questions 40–43)0.27 (0.14)
 Nonphysicians in my practice carry out clinical instructions0.18 (0.14)
 Not enough support staff0.19 (0.16)
 Using EHR has improved my practice0.61 (0.21)
 Overall satisfaction with practice0.27 (0.22)
Financial/productivity, $e
 Net revenue/visit147.27 (10.53)
 Clinician cost/visit64.04 (20.18)
 Clinician cost/WRVU45.39 (14.35)
 Staff cost/visit64.51 (11.14)
 Net revenue/WRVU104.17 (4.61)
 Staff cost/WRVU45.86 (8.11)
 Staff cost/clinician FTE240,965.50 (52,506.46)
 WRVU/clinician FTE5,525.50 (1,526.03)
 Visits/clinician FTE3,856.80 (974.90)
  • ACE=angiotensin-converting enzyme; AF=atrial fibrillation; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker; CAD = coronary artery disease; CBD = Care by Design; EHR = electronic health record; FTE = full-time equivalent; HbA1c=hemoglobin A1c; HF = heart failure; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LVF = left ventricular function; LVSD = left ventricular systolic dysfunction; MA = medical assistant; MI = myocardial infarction; TSF = telephone service factor; WRVU = work relative value units.

  • Notes: Denominators for the quality measures varied by measure and ranged from 233 to 20,143. Completed patient satisfaction questionnaires were returned by 2,051 unique patients in 2011 on the basis of visit date. The clinician satisfaction questionnaire was completed by 51 unique clinicians in 2011.

  • a Implementation scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater degree of implementation.

  • b A patient portal in the EHR.

  • c A patient history template in the EHR.

  • d Patient and clinician satisfaction scores range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

  • e Dollars in 2011.