Table 3

Perceptions of Shared Decision Making Around Prostate Cancer Screening Discussions: Intention-to-Treat Analysis

PerceptionControlMD-EdMD-Ed vs Control AMD (95% CI)MD-Ed+AMD-Ed+A vs Control AMD (95% CI)
Patient self-report, total patients, No.291188102
Patients who reported discussing PSA screening, No. (%)111 (38)78 (41)0.03 (−0.05 to 0.12)66 (65)0.27 (0.14 to 0.40)
Overall PSA shared decision making, summed mean score (SD)a11.8 (3.0)11.4 (3.0)−0.29 (−1.30 to 0.71)12.4 (3.0)0.87 (−0.17 to 1.90)
PSA shared decision-making, mean score (SD)b
 Discussed pros and cons of PSA screening3.0 (0.7)2.9 (0.9)−0.09 (−0.36 to 0.19)3.2 (0.8)0.26 (−0.02 to 0.54)
 Offered me choices about whether to get PSA2.8 (0.8)2.8 (1.0)−0.01 (−0.31 to 0.27)3.0(0.9)0.27 (−0.02 to 0.58)
 Asked me to state whether I wanted a PSA2.8 (0.8)2.8 (1.0)0.03 (−0.29 to 0.24)3.0 (0.9)0.32 (−0.006 to 0.64)
 Took my preferences into account when deciding3.1 (0.7)2.9 (0.9)−0.18 (−0.44 to 0.08)3.2(0.7)0.11 (−0.14 to 0.38)
Patient values, mean score (SD)c
When faced with an important decision about your health, how important is it that you help decide what to do?6.4 (1.2)6.5 (0.9)0.17 (−0.04 to 0.38)6.4 (1.1)0.01 (−0.24 to 0.27)
How much do you worry about being diagnosed with prostate cancer?3.0 (1.6)3.2 (1.7)0.29 (−0.04 to 0.62)2.7 (1.4)−0.30 (−0.69 to 0.09)
How worried would you be if you knew that you had prostate cancer cells in your body, even if they might not cause any harm?4.3 (1.8)4.5 (1.8)0.23 (−0.11 to −0.56)3.6 (1.5)−0.70 (−1.10 to −0.30)
How much would it bother you to have some difficulty controlling your urine?5.6 (1.4)5.7 (1.3)0.01 (−0.29 to 0.31)5.2 (1.4)−0.49 (−0.83 to −0.14)
How much would it bother you if you could rarely, if ever, get enough of an erection to have sex?5.7 (1.7)5.6 (1.6)−0.01 (−0.035 to 0.33)5.4 (1.7)−0.20 (−0.30 to 0.20)
Unannounced standardized patient report, No. of visits434136
Overall PSA shared decision making, mean score (SD)a10.0 (3.1)10.2 (3.0)0.002 (−1.15 to 1.15)10.7 (2.7)0.32 (−0.90 to 1.54)
PSA shared decision-making, mean score (SD)b
 Discussed pros and cons of PSA screening3.0 (0.9)3.1 (0.9)0.11 (−0.26 to 0.47)3.2 (0.8)0.18 (−0.21 to 0.57)
 Offered me choices about whether to get PSA2.7 (1.1)2.7 (1.1)−0.06 (−0.60 to 0.47)3.0 (0.9)0.25 (−0.30 to 0.80)
 Asked me to state whether I wanted a PSA2.1 (1.0)2.0 (0.9)−0.18 (−0.59 to 0.24)2.3 (0.8)−0.02 (−0.45 to 0.41)
 Took my preferences into account when deciding2.3 (1.0)2.4 (1.0)0.12 (−0.24 to 0.49)2.4 (0.9)−0.01 (−0.40 to 0.38)
Pre-post change in shared deicision making, by physician self-report, No. of physiciansd434136
Change in shared decision making, summed mean score (SD)e0.2 (1.5)0.2 (1.5)−0.05 (−0.72 to 0.61)0.1 (1.5)−0.10 (−0.77 to 0.56)
Physician shared decision making, mean score (SD)
How often do you offer your patients choices in their medical care?0.1 (0.6)0.1 (0.6)0.07 (−0.18 to 0.33)−0.03 (0.6)−0.11 (−0.37 to 0.15)
How often do you discuss the pros and cons of each choice with your patients?0.2 (0.7)0.0 (0.6)−0.21 (−0.49 to 0.07)0.2 (0.5)0.07 (−0.21 to 0.35)
How often do you ask your patients to state which choice or option they would prefer?0.0 (0.7)0.0 (0.6)−0.02 (−0.34 to 0.30)0.0 (0.7)−0.01 (−0.33 to 0.30)
How often do you take your patients’ preferences into account when making treatment decisions?0.0 (0.6)0.0 (0.6)0.09 (−0.20 to 0.38)−0.1 (0.7)−0.05 (−0.35 to 0.24)
Pre-post change in physician self-reported scores, mean (SD)d
With a typical average-risk patient, how much time do you usually spend discussing the risks and benefits of PSA screening?0.1 (0.7)0.3 (0.6)0.18 (−0.13 to 0.49)0.6 (0.7)0.46 (0.15 to 0.78)
  • AMD= adjusted mean difference; MD-Ed = physician education; MD-Ed+A = physician education with patient activation; PSA = prostate-specific antigen. Notes: Between-arm contrasts estimated in mixed-effects models for clustered data, with statistical adjustments for health system site.

  • a Instrument scale derived from Kaplan. Scale scores ranged from 4 = strongly disagree to 16 = strongly agree.

  • b Item scores ranged from 1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree.

  • c Item scores ranged from 1 = not at all to 7 = a great deal.

  • d Preintervention to postintervention change. Scale scores ranged from 1 = never to 5 = in depth.

  • e Instrument scale derived from Kaplan.