Table 2

Satisfaction With Care for Propensity-Matched Patients in SMAs Relative to Those in Usual Care Visits

Visit Experience ItemAdjusted OR (95% CI)P Value
Enhanced access to care
 Ability to get desired appointment1.49 (1.21–1.92)<.001
 Convenience of office hours1.22 (1.02–1.45).03
 Promptness in returning calls1.06 (0.91–1.81).44
 Wait for laboratory tests1.49 (1.21–1.92).03
Coordination of care
 Speed of registration0.94 (0.73–1.22).66
 Wait for clinician in examination room1.13 (0.91–1.40).28
 Clinician information from specialist physicians0.86 (0.73–1.01).07
 Clinician had information to diagnose/treat0.85 (0.70–1.04).11
Personal physician communication
 Clinician explanation of problem/condition0.60 (0.50–0.73)<.001
 Information clinician gave about medication0.64 (0.54–0.77)<.001
 Time clinician spent with patient0.52 (0.50–1.60)<.001
 Concern expressed by clinician0.58 (0.50–0.70)<.001
Team-based care
 Friendliness/courtesy of nurse/assistant1.27 (0.97–1.65).08
 Concern nurse/assistant showed for problem1.13 (0.96–1.34).15
Whole-person orientation of care
 Sensitivity to patients’ needs1.34 (1.08–1.65).01
 Concern for patients’ privacy1.14 (0.97–1.35).12
 Patient’s confidence in clinician1.13 (0.91–1.38).27
Overall impressions
 Overall satisfaction with care provided in visit1.26 (1.05–1.52).01
 Recommend clinician0.93 (0.75–1.16).54
  • OR=odds ratio; SMA=shared medical appointment.

  • Note: Odds of rating the item as “very good.” Results are propensity score matched to account for differences in variables that are related to SMA participation. See Methods for details.