Table 2

Challenges in Implementation of Genomic Medicine in Primary Care and Potential Solutions

ChallengePotential Solutions
Limited evidence and conflicting interpretation of benefit/valueGenerate evidence of clinical utility of genomic medicine interventions in PCMH settings
Tailor needs for evidence against potential benefits and harms
Convene expert panels to develop primary care guidelines based on best evidence
Engage community-based practices to assist in developing evidence
Determine process outcomes of incorporating genomic information into EHRs
Publicize success widely
Organize consortia to conduct practice-based research trials of genotype-derived therapy when appropriate
Lack of institutional and clinician acceptanceCarry out RE-AIM framework evaluation at the level of the PCMH or PCMH network (Figure 1)
Establish institutional advisory committee(s) involving senior leadership and partner with early adopter programs to evaluate evidence, recommend and monitor implementation—at health care centers, community or regional levels—consistent with principles of primary care (Table 1) and community values
Engage early adopters and clinical champions in demonstration efforts
Conduct pilot projects in early adopter PCMHs to develop results sufficient for follow-on funding
Obtain transinstitutional commitment at highest levels involving all relevant departments and stakeholders
Utilize internal pilot funding to catalyze initiation
Build clinician acceptance of clinical genetics professionals by judiciously integrating genetic counselors and/or geneticists in nongenetics clinical services throughout primary institution/clinic and affiliated institutions
Bring fragmented expertise for advancing genomic medicine under 1 transdisciplinary PCMH program or network
Harness institutional (clinic or affiliated health care center) quality improvement processes to assess value
Limited access to genomic medicine expertise and testingUse research-screening assays on site and confirm clinically actionable findings with rapid, cost-effective, CLIA-certified off-site testing if necessary
Establish or expand institutional CLIA-compliant genotyping to expand point-of-care testing, same-day service
Choose platform to assay multiple important genotypes simultaneously, reliably, and inexpensively
Invest in new equipment and personnel to ensure research quality is at the same level as the clinical laboratory; this effort requires institutional investment
Work with genetic counselors in PCMH teams to establish protocols for process and parameters of data return
Lack of standards for genomic applicationsDevelop agreed-upon framework or standards for evaluation of genomic medicine applications
Develop standardized order sets and process modification
Develop standards for analytic validity of whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing sufficient for clinical interpretation of the variants found by these methods
EHR integration of genomic results and CDSEnable access to actionable genomic information in the EHR through development of user-friendly decision-support algorithms for primary care clinicians
Establish a “usability lab” to test genomic medicine applications in the EHR and assess CDS tools
Allocate genomic medicine institutional funding to develop education and outreach to disseminate best practices incorporating family history and genomic information
Redesign EHR to include section dedicated to containing all relevant genotype results for each patient
Develop and link actionable drug-gene pair decision to electronic pharmaceutical ordering software at point-of-care adoption of pharmacogenomic testing
Establish interdisciplinary workgroup with genomic medicine, chronic care, and EHR team to create secure tools for EHR-based genomic decision support
Establish ordering protocols to prompt appropriate referrals to genetic counselors based upon type and indication of genomic testing ordered
Follow-up of patients after genotypingShift from relying on primary care clinician direct contact to PCMH/genomic medicine teams with permission of clinician
Analyze and address reasons for refusal to complete confirmatory testing, such as lack of coverage for testing
Outreach to at-risk family membersClarify implications for family members and clinicians’ responsibilities toward family members
Explore ways to improve information to at-risk families
ConsentEnsure that informed consents for implementation projects conducted as research studies include returning results to patients and entering results into EHR
Conformance with standard of care and specific consent may not be needed
Consider implementation projects that might not require consent, such as results in established clinical pathways (tumor mutations and germline polymorphisms affecting treatment decisions) in partnership with medical subspecialists who have content-specific expertise
Develop standards for informed consent for extensive genotyping or sequencing, including whole-genome sequencing, and obtain it prospectively and combine with protocols for testing indications
Ensure that availability of personnel to manage consent/counseling is not rate limiting in initial implementation
Understanding by patients, clinicians, publicConduct focus groups of patients, clinicians, and ancillary personnel to identify specific educational needs
Conduct genetic and genomic medicine campaign for patients, clinicians, and ancillary personnel based on focus group input
Survey retention of educational information by patients and clinicians and modify programs as needed
Conduct genotyping and/or sequencing and interpretation exercises with medical and other health profession students
Provide specific health care clinician education on when to order tests, and how to interpret results, and how to act on implications for family members and clinician’s responsibilities
Introduce pharmacogenomic lectures into health professionals’ training and continuing education
Provide clinical supervision to clinician trainees in use of pharmacogenomic testing, other genomic point-of-care testing
Include American Board of Family Medicine (and other boards) maintenance of certification self-assessment modules in genomic medicine
Development and dissemination of new educational objectives by the National Human Genome Research Institute Inter-Society Coordinating Committee for Practitioner Education in Genomics
Lack of access to comparison “control” sequence data and banking resourcesCombine current PCMH’s small patient collections of reference sequences and make available to all centers
Prioritize funding for costly and time-consuming storage of viable tissues/biospecimens for DNA analyses
Biobank tissues/biospecimens for confirmatory clinical sequencing with patient identifiers
High-level institutional or PCMH network commitment to combine and organize multiple biorepositories for efficiency and ease of access while protecting patient privacy
Lack of research funding and reimbursementUntil evidence is established for making genomic testing a new standard of care, consider research funding for testing in interim between discovery and adoption into PCMHs
Gradually change culture to convince health care community and patients of value of genomic medicine and need for reimbursement
Demonstrate cost of testing is not prohibitive and savings impact can be substantial
Provide institutional back-up for reimbursement to avoid charges to patients
Anticipate rises in interpretive and delivery costs as technology cost drops and enthusiasm increases
  • CDS = clinical decision support; CLIA = Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments; EHR = electronic health record; PCMH = patient-centered medical home; RE-AIM = reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance.

  • Note: Challenges to clinical implementation identified by a National Human Genome Research Institute Genomic Medicine Colloquium representing 20 health care organizations and working groups in June 2011.16 Table adapted to the goal of integration of genomic medicine clinical implementation with primary care redesign.