Pre- and Postlicensure Comparison Table
Domain | Prelicensure (2004–2005) | Postlicensure (2009–2012) |
---|---|---|
HPV counseling in the clinical encounter | High clinician receptivity Low patient/parent HPV knowledge Complexity of topic challenging HPV infection counseling typically not part of guidance about STI prevention | High clinician receptivity High patient/parent receptivity Low patient/parent HPV knowledge Topic ever more complex with 2 competing vaccines and approval for boys Framing of HPV vaccine as cancer prevention rather than STI prevention |
Recommended age | Preference for vaccinating older adolescents Topics discussed with younger girls different from older girls Parents accompany younger adolescents to most primary care visits (though clinicians prefer them not to be present) | Mixed results about age range that clinicians are comfortable vaccinating Framing of HPV vaccine as cancer prevention rather than STI prevention (to get around discomfort of discussing sex with younger girls) Challenges in talking about sex (avoidance of discussion), including parents being present |
System and compliance issues | Challenges speculated:
| Challenges borne out:
Lack of knowledge about 6-month time frame |
External factors | Anticipated impact of mass media advertising campaigns Concern that diverse social or religious beliefs about sexual activity would influence acceptability; fear that adolescents would feel overprotected | Media campaign influential, but brought awareness, not necessarily knowledge Mandatory vaccination proposals generated controversy Less concern about adolescent overprotection; responses to mandatory vaccination proposals negative Bundling of HPV vaccine into adolescent platform |
HPV=human papillomavirus; STI=sexually transmitted infection.