Table 2

Prognostic Outcomes in Patients With and Without Bacterial LRTI

OutcomeBacterial LRTI Present (n = 162)Bacterial LRTI Absent, (n = 672)Crude Analysis No. (95% CI)Adjusted Analysis No. (95% CI)aP ValuebMissing No. (%)
Time to resolution of symptoms rated “moderately bad or worse,” median (IQR)d7 (5–15)7 (4–13)0.89 (0.74–1.07)c0.92 (0.77–1.11)c.3751 (0.1)
Symptom severity score on days 2 to 4 after consultation, mean (SD)d1.86 (1.07)1.67 (1.00)0.19 (0.02–0.37)e0.21 (0.04–0.38)e.0143 (0.4)
Duration of symptoms until complete resolution, median (IQR)d15 (10–28)13 (8–27)0.88 (0.71–1.10)c0.92 (0.74–1.15)c.4711 (0.1)
Worsening of illness, No. (%)d44/162 (27)114/660 (17)1.79 (1.20–2.67)f1.82 (1.21–2.74)f.00412 (1.4)
Duration of interference with normal activities/work, median (IQR)d6 (1–10)5 (0–9)0.91 (0.76–1.09)c0.91 (0.76–1.09)c.3216 (0.7)
  • IQR = interquartile range; LRTI = lower respiratory tract infection.

  • a Adjusted for age (for each year increase), current smoking, comorbidity, and cough duration before index consultation.

  • b For adjusted analysis.

  • c Hazard ratio.

  • d Each symptom was scored by the patient from 0 to 6, with 0 = no problem, 1 = very little problem, 2 = slight problem, 3 = moderately bad, 4 = bad, 5 = very bad, 6 = as bad as it could be.

  • d The great majority of these represent return visits with new or worsening symptoms, and only 2 patients required hospital admission (1 from the bacterial LRTI group and 1 from the nonbacterial LRTI group) within 4 weeks after the first consultation. No study-related deaths were noted.

  • e Difference.

  • F Odds ratio.