Table 3

Results of Group Effect on WOMAC Pain Score Using Analysis of Covariance

Analysis PerformedIntervention Group (n = 104), mean (SD)Control Group (n = 104), mean (SD)Model 1Model 2a
Between-Group Difference (95% CI)P ValueSEBetween-Group Difference (95% CI)P ValueSE
ITT analysis
 Week 046.2 (21.6)47.7 (19.8)
 Week 2428.8 (23.4)44.3 (22.3)–15.5(–21.9 to – 9.0)<.0013.3–15.6(–20.5 to – 10.7)<.0012.5
Per–protocol analysisb
 Week 047.6 (21.3)47.6 (19.7)
 Week 2429.4 (23.3)44.3 (22.3)–14.9(–21.4 to – 8.4)<.0013.3–16.0(–21.0 to – 11.0)<.0012.6
Imputed data analysis
Week 046.2 (21.6)47.7 (19.8)
Week 2428.9 (24.1)44.6 (22.8)–15.8(–22.2 to – 9.3)<.0013.3–14.9(–20.1 to – 9.8)<.0012.6
Per–protocol analysis with imputationb
 Week 047.6 (21.3)47.6 (19.7)
 Week 2429.5 (23.3)44.8 (22.4)–15.3 (–21.9 to – 8.7)<.0013.3–15.8 (–20.9 to – 10.7)<.0012.6
  • ITT = intention–to–treat; SD = standard deviation; SE = standard error; WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.

  • a Adjusted for baseline score, duration of knee pain, number of comorbidities, bilateral knee pain status (yes or no), total amount of analgesic consumption, and age.

  • b Included participants who attended all 3 sessions.