Skip to main content
Log in

Sense of coherence and outcome of low-back surgery: 5-year follow-up of 80 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eighty adult patients, 33 men and 47 women, mean age 46 years (SD 11.8, range 19–74 years), were evaluated 5 years after lowback surgery. The mean duration of symptoms before operation was 8.7 (SD 7.1) years. The purpose was to evaluate the 5-year outcome of lowback surgery, to find the best predictors for the outcome, and to find out if a correlation exists between the patient's sense of coherence and the outcome of low-back surgery. The mean Oswestry pain index for the whole group of patients improved from 3.8 to 2.7 (P<0.001). The greatest improvement in pain was found in the group aged 35–50 years. In those over 50 years old, pain improved significantly more in women than men. Regarding walking ability, the mean Oswestry gait index for the whole group improved from 3.0 to 1.9 (P<0.001), with men over 50 years old achieving the greatest improvement in their walking. The mean Oswestry total index for the whole group was 41% before surgery, reflecting severe disability, and 25% at follow-up, reflecting moderate disability (P<0.001). There was no difference between the mean values for men and women. Patients who had undergone several previous operations fared less well in the Oswestry total index, though their improvement was still significant (P<0.05). The postoperative Oswestry total index values correlated significantly with the sense of coherence (SOC) scale values (r=-0.23, P<0.05). In all patients, the Oswestry total index before the index operation is suggested to be a predictor of the final outcome. In multiple regression analysis, the number of previous operations and the preoperatively recorded Oswestry total index appeared to be the best predictors for outcome of low-back surgery. We also found that the SOC scale correlated significantly with the Oswestry total index and seems to provide a possible explanation of ability to cope with the disability and pain associated with low-back disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alaranta H (1985) Factors defining impairment, disability and handicap in a population of patients examined one year following surgery for lumbar disc herniation. Publications of the Social Insurance Institution, no. 25 (in Finnish). Social Insurance Institution, Helsinki, pp 1–161

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allan DB, Waddell G (1989) An historical perspective on low back pain and disability. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl 234] 60:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  3. Antonovsky A (1987) Unravelling the mystery of health. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  4. Antonovsky A (1993a) The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med 36:725–733

    Google Scholar 

  5. Antonovsky A (1993b) Complexity, conflict, chaos, coherence, coercion and civility. Soc Sci Med 37:969–981

    Google Scholar 

  6. Antonovsky H, Sagy S (1986) The development of a sense of coherence and its impact on responses to stress situations. J Soc Psychol 126:213–225

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cameron AJR, Shepel LF (1983) Psychological assessment. In: Kirkaldy-Willis WH (ed) Managing low back pain. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 63–73

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deyo RA, Centor RM (1986) Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chron Dis 39:897–906

    Google Scholar 

  9. Estlander AM (1991) Assessment and treatment of chronic low back pain patients. Research Reports of the Rehabilitation Foundation, no. 25. Rehabilitation Foundation, Helsinki, pp 1–57

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fairbanks JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physioltherapy 66:271–273

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fordyce WE (1976) Behavioral methods in chronic pain and illness. Mosby, St Louis

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fordyce WE (1978) Learning processes in pain. In: Sternbach RA (ed) The psychology of pain. Raven Press, New York, pp 49–72

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gaskin ME, Greene AF, Robinson ME, Geisser ME (1992) Negative affect and the experience of chronic pain. J Psychosom Res 36:707–713

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grönblad M, Weinstein A, Santavirta S (1991) Immunohistochemical observations on spinal tissue innervation. A review of hypothetical mechanisms of back pain. Acta Orthop Scand 62:614–622

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heliövaara M (1988) Epidemiology of sciatica and herniated lumbar intervertebral disc. Publications of the Social Insurance Institution, no. 76. Social Insurance Institution, Helsinki, pp 1–115

    Google Scholar 

  16. Härkäpää K, Järvikoski A, Mellin G, Hurri H, Luoma J (1991) Health locus of control beliefs and psychological distress as predictors for treatment outcome in low-back pain patients: results of a 3-month follow-up of a controlled intervention study. Pain 46:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jensen I (1993) Non-specific spinal pain. Multidisciplinary intervention, a cognitive-behavioral approach. Thesis, Stockholm

  18. Jensen I, Nygren Å, Gamberale E, Goldie I, Westerholm P (1994) Coping with long-term musculoskeletal pain and its consequences: is gender a factor? Pain 57:167–172

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, Karoly P (1991a) Coping with chronic pain: a review of the literature. Pain 47:249–283

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM (1991b) Self-efficacy and outcome expectancies: relationship to chronic pain, coping strategies and adjustment. Pain 44:263–269

    Google Scholar 

  21. Keefe MP, Brown GK, Wallston KA, Caldwell DS (1989) Coping with rheumatoid arthritis pain: catastrophizing as a maladaptive strategy. Pain 37:51–56

    Google Scholar 

  22. Keefe FJ, Beckham JC, Fillingim RB (1991) The psychology of chronic back pain. In: Frymoyer JW (ed) The adult spine: principles and practice. Raven Press, New York, pp 185–197

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM (1995) Functional disability scales for back pain. Spine 20:1943–1949

    Google Scholar 

  24. Langius A, Björvell H, Antonovsky A (1992) The sense of coherence concept and its relation to personality traints in Swedish samples. Scand J Caring Sci 6:165–171

    Google Scholar 

  25. Main CJ, Waddell G (1991) A comparison of cognitive measures in low back pain: statistical structure and clinical validity at initial assessment. Pain 46:287–298

    Google Scholar 

  26. Manniche C, Asmussen K, Lauritzen B, Vinterberg H, Kreiner S, Jordan A (1994) Low back pain rating scale: validation of a tool for assessment of low back pain. Pain 57:317–326

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nachemson AL (1991) Spinal disorders. Overall impact on society and the need for orthopaedic resources. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl 241] 62:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nachemson AL (1992) Newest knowledge of low-back pain. Clin Orthop 279:8–20

    Google Scholar 

  29. O'Farrell V, Tate N, Aitken C (1993) Attitudes and prognosis in chronic low back pain. J Psychosom Res 37:415–422

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pearce S (1983) A review of cognitive-behavioral methods for the treatment of chronic pain. J Psychosom Res 27:431–440

    Google Scholar 

  31. Santavirta S, Konttinen YT (1991) Lumbar spine: studies on pathobiology, clinical examination and surgical treatment. Curr Opin Orthop 2:206–211

    Google Scholar 

  32. Santavirta S, Tallroth K, Konttinen YT (1992) Spinal anomalies and developmental disturbances. Curr Opin Orthop 3:199–203

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sievers K, Klaukka T (1991) Back pain and arthrosis in Finland. How many patients by the year 2000? Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl 241] 62:3–5

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stratford P, Solomon P, Binkley J, Finch E, Gill C (1993) Sensitivity of sickness impact profile items to measure change over time in a low-back pain patient group. Spine 18:1723–1727

    Google Scholar 

  35. Turner JA, Clancy S (1986) Strategies for coping with low back pain: relationship to pain and disability. Pain 24:355–364

    Google Scholar 

  36. Viikari-Juntura E, Vuori J, Silverstein BA, Kalimo R, Kuosma E, Videman T (1991) A life-long prospective study on the role of psychosocial factors in neck-shoulder and low-back pain. Spine 16:1056–1061

    Google Scholar 

  37. Waddell G (1987) A new clinical model for the treatment of low back pair. Spine 12:632–644

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santavirta, N., Björvell, H., Konttinen, Y.T. et al. Sense of coherence and outcome of low-back surgery: 5-year follow-up of 80 patients. Eur Spine J 5, 229–235 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301325

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301325

Key words

Navigation