Skip to main content
Log in

Area under the curve: A metric for patient subjective responses in episodic diseases

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Herpes zoster manifests as a characteristic painful rash that resolves within 2 months of initial presentation in 90% of patients. As pain is a hallmark of the disease, the severity of an episode can be described by the magnitude and duration of pain. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) was used to follow the daily and weekly amount of pain reported by 50 patients with herpes zoster. Results demonstrate that the BPI is a reproducible, responsive and valid measure of pain due to herpes zoster. From the individual responses on the BPI, the area under the curve (AUC) for each patient was derived from the pain reported on sequential administrations of the BPI. This metric was simple to calculate, easy to explain and captured two dimensions of this episodic disease (magnitude and duration of pain) in a single continuous measure. AUC could prove useful in the application of patient response data to intervention trials in diseases that are of an episodic nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ReulerJB, ChangMK. Herpes zoster: Epidemiology, clinical features, and management. South Med J 1984; 77: 1148–1156.

    Google Scholar 

  2. WoodMJ. Herpes zoster and pain. Scand J Infect 1991; 78 (Suppl.): 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chang MN, Guess HA, Heyse JF. Reduction in burden of illness: A new efficacy measure for prevention trials. Stat Med. 1994.

  4. CleelandCS. Assessment of pain in cancer: Measurement issues. Adv Pain Res Ther 1990; 16: 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  5. DautRL, CleelandCS, FlanneryRS. Development of the Wisconsin brief pain questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain 1983; 17: 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  6. StewartAL, HaysRD, WareJEJr. The MOS short-form general health survey: Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care 1988; 26: 724–735.

    Google Scholar 

  7. WareJEJr, SherbourneCD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  8. KirschnerB, GuyattG. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 1985; 38: 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  9. DeyoRA, DiehrP, PatrickDL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Controlled Clin Trials 1991; 12: 142S-158S.

    Google Scholar 

  10. RagozzinoMW, MeltonIIILJ, KurlandLT, ChuCP, PerryHO. Population-based study of herpes zoster and its sequelae. Medicine 1992; 61: 310–316

    Google Scholar 

  11. WareJEJr, SnowKK, KosinskiM, GandekB. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. GuyattGH, KirschnerB, JaeschkeR. Measuring health status: What are the necessary measurement properties? J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 1341–1345.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lydick, E., Epstein, R.S., Himmelberger, D. et al. Area under the curve: A metric for patient subjective responses in episodic diseases. Qual Life Res 4, 41–45 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434382

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434382

Key words

Navigation