Skip to main content
Log in

A breast feeding education and promotion program: Effects on knowledge, attitudes, and support for breast feeding

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine the effects of a partner-support, incentive-baed educational program on breast feeding knowledge, attitudes and support and to examine the relationship between feeding intentions and feeding behavior among low-income women. Women who expressed a willingness to participate in the intervention were randomly assigned to “intervention” and “usual breast feeding” (control) groups. Sixty-eight primipara women, with expected due dates between May and December, 1992, volunteered to participate in the study. Of these, 34 were randomly assigned to each of the two groups. Approximately 81 percent of the women completed the study, leaving n=29 in the control group and n-26 in the intervention group. The intervention consisted of special incentives (prizes) for women and their partners to participate in several breast feeding education and promotion activities. Intervention group women and their partners experienced positive changes in breast feeding knowledge and attitudes. Furthermore, the intervention seemed to have influenced more women in the treatment group to breast feed despite their prenatal feeding intentions. In addition, the partners of intervention group women were perceived to be more supportive of, breast feeding than control group partners. These findings suggest that incentives, such as donated prizes, can be used to attract lower socioeconomic group women and their partners to breast feeding promotion interventions. Participation in such interventions can produce positive changes in breast feeding knowledge, attitudes, and support, and can have a dramatic effect in promoting breast feeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Committee on Nutrition of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Canadian Pediatric Society. Breast feeding: A commentary in celebration of the International Year of the Child, 1979.Pediatrics 1978; 62:591–601.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Councils of the Society for Pediatric Research and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Promotion of breast feeding: Recommendations of the Councils of the Society for Pediatric Research and American Pediatric Society, and of the American Academy of Pediatrics.Pediatr. Res 1982; 16:264–265.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nutrition Committees, American Academy of Pediatrics. Encouraging breast feeding.Pediatrics 1980; 65:657–658.

    Google Scholar 

  4. US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.Healthy People 2000, National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. Washington, DC: U.S., Government Printing Office, 1990, pp 379–380.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anholm PCH. Breastfeeding: A preventive approach, to health care in infancy.Issues in Comprehensive Pediatr Nursing 1986;9:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cunningham AS, Jelliffe DB, Jelliffe EF. Breast-feeding and health in the 1980s: A global epdiemiologic review.J Pediatr 1991; 118:659–666.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jelliffe DB, Jelliffe EP. “Breast is best”: Modern meanings.N. Engl J Med 1977; 297:912–915.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cunningham AS. Morbidity in breast-fed, and artificially fed infants II.J Pediatr 1979; 95:685–689.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leventhal JM, Shapiro ED, Aten CB, et al. Does breast-feeding protect against infections in infants less than 3 months of age?Pediatrics 1986; 78:896–903.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kovar MG, Serdula MK, Marks JS, Fraser DW. Review of the epidemiologic evidence for an association between infant feeding and infant health.Pediatrics 1984; 74 (suppl):615–638.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ryan AS, Lewandowski G, Krieger FW. The recent decline in breastfeeding. 1984–1989.Pediatrics 1991; 8:873–874.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martinez G, Krieger F 1984 Milk-feeding patterns in the United States.Pediatrics 1985; 76:1004–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martinez GA. Trends in breast feeding in the United States. InReport of the Surgeon General's Workshop on Breast Feeding and Human Lactation. U.S. Dept Health and Human Services, 1984.

  14. Hendershot GF Trends and differentials in breastfeeding in the United States, 1970–75. Hyattsville, MD: National, Center for Health Statistics. Working Paper Series, No. 5, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ryan A, Rush D, Krieger F, Lewandowski G. Recent declinesin thebreastfeeding in the United States, 1984–1989.Pediatrics 1991; 88:719–727.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Beske EJ, Garvis MSS. Important factors in breast feeding success.MCN: Am J of Maternal Child Nursing 1982; 7:174–179.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holt GM, Wolkind SN. Early abandonment of breastfeeding: Causes and effects.Child: Care, Health and Development 1983; 9:349–355.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Applebaum RM. The modern management of successful breastfeeding.Pediatric Clinics of North America 1970; 17:203–225.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gielen AC, Faden RR, O'Campo P, Paige DM. Determinants of breastfeeding in a rural WIC population.J Human Lactation 1992; 8:11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martinez G, Dodd D. Milk feeding patterns in the United States during the first 12 months of life.Pediatrics 1983; 71:166.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bryant C. Impact of kin, friend, and neighbor networks on infant feeding practices.Soc. Sci Med 1982; 16:1757.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jones D, West R. Lactation nurse increases duration of breast feeding.Arch Dis Child 1985; 60: 772.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barron SP, Lane HW, Hannan TE, Struemplen B, Williams JC. Factors influencing duration of breast feeding among low-income women.J of Am Dietetics Assoc 1988; 88:1557–1561.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Freed GL, Jones TM, Schanler JR. Prenatal determination of demographic and attitudinal factors regarding feeding practice in an indigent population.Am J Perinatology 1992; 9:420–424.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dusdieker LB, Booth BM, Seals BF, Ekow EE. Investigation of a model for the initiation of breastfeeding in primiparous women.Soc Sci Med 1985; 20:695–703.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Matich JR, Sims LS. A comparison of social support variables between women who intend to breast or bottle feed.Social Science and Medicine 1992; 34:919–927.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mohrer J. Breastfeeding and bottle feeding in an inner-city community: An assessment of, perceptions and pratices.Med Anthropol 1979; 3:125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jones DA, West RR, Newcombe RG. Maternal characteristics associated with the duration of breastfeeding.Midwifery 1986; 2:141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bevan ML, Mosley D, Lobach KS, Sulimano GR. Factors influencing breast feeding in an urban WIC program.J Am Diet Assoc 1984; 84:563–567.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Black RF, Blair JP, Jones VN, Du Rant RH. Infant feeding decisions among pregnant women from a WIC population in Georiga.J Am Diet Assoc 1990; 90:225–259.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Isabella PH, Isabella RA, Correlates of long-term breastfeeding: A study of social and personal factors. EDRS Research Report No. 143, RIE DEC 1–9, 1991.

  32. Switzky LT, Vietze P, Switzky HN. Attitudinal and demographic, predictors of brast-feeding and bouttle-feeding behavior by mothers of six-week-old infants.Psychol Rep 1979; 45:3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Neville MC, Neifert MR, eds.Lactation: Physiology, Nutrition, and Breast-feeding. New York: Plenum Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  34. LeFevre M, Kruse J, Zweig S. Selection of, infant feeding method: A population-based study in a rural area.J of Family Practice 1987; 24:487–491.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sciacca, J, Phipps B, Dube D, Ratliff M. Influences on breast-feeding by lower-income women: An incentive-based, partner-supported educational program.J of Am Diestetics Assoc 1995; 95:323–328.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Allen, L, Pelto G, Research on determinants of breastfeeding duration: Suggestions for biocultural studies.Med Anthro 1985; 9:97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kaplowitz DD, Olson CM. The effect of an education program on the decision to breastfeed.J of Nutritional Ed 1983; 15:61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Leeper JD, Milo T, Collins TR Infant feeding and maternal attitudes among mothers of lowincone.Psychol Rep 1983; 53:259–265.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yeung D, Pennell MD, Leung M, Hall J. Breastfeeding: Prevalence and influencing factors.Can J Publ Hlth 1981; 72:323–330.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sacks S, Brada M, Hill AM, Barton P, Harland PSEG. To breast feed or not to breat feed. A survey of primiparae.The Practitioner 1976; 216:183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Winikoff B, Baer EC. The obstetrician's opportunity: Translating ‘breast is best’ from theory to practice.Am J Obstet Gynec 1980; 138:105–117.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Axelson ML, Kuriniji N, Sahlroot TJ, Forman MR. Primiparas' beliefs about breast-feeding.J Am Diet Assoc 1985; 85:77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Grossman LK, Fitzsimmons SM, Larsen-Alexander JB, Sachs L, Harter C. The infant feeding decision in low and upper income women.Clinical Pediatrics 1990; 21:30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jones, DA. The choice to breast feed for bottle feed and influences upon that choice: A survey of 1525 mothers.Child: Care and Development 1987; 13:75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Novotny R, Kieffer E, Mor J, Thiele M, Nikaido M. Health of infant is the main reason for breastfeeding in a WIC population in Hawaii.J of Am Dietetics Assoc 1994; 94:293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Freed GL, Fraley JK, Schanter RJ. Attitudes of expectant fathers regarding breast-feeding.Pediatrics 1992; 90:224–227.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Robinson J, Huat A, Pope J, Garner B. Attitudes toward infant feeding among adolescent mothers from aWIC population in northern Louisiana.J of Am Dietetics Assoc 1993; 93:1311–1313.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Stashwick CA. Overcoming obstacles to breastfeeding.Patient Care 1994; 28:88.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tuttle CR, Dewey KG. Determinants of infant feeding choices among southeast Asian immigrants in northern California.J of Am Dietetics Assoc 1994; 94:282–286.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Barnes J, Leggett J, Durham T, Breast feeders versus bottle feeders: Differences in femininity perceptions.Maternal-Child Rearing J 1993; 21:15–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported through contract no. 59-3198-1-050 from the Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sciacca, J.P., Dube, D.A., Phipps, B.L. et al. A breast feeding education and promotion program: Effects on knowledge, attitudes, and support for breast feeding. J Community Health 20, 473–490 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02277064

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02277064

Keywords

Navigation