Abstract
Background and aims: To evaluate the effect of interdisciplinary outpatient geriatrics on the use, cost, and quality of health services in a fee-for-service (FFS) environment of two networks of primary care clinics operated by a not-for-profit provider organization in Dallas County, Texas. Methods: The Senior Health Network (SHN) provides interdisciplinary primary care to patients aged 55 years or older; the Health Texas Provider Network (HTPN) provides “usual” primary care to patients of all ages. We conducted a two-year retrospective cohort study of 13,098 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries who had 2+ visits to one of the networks in 2000. In the SHN, interdisciplinary teams supplemented primary care with social services, specialized clinics, andhealth education. We compared the use, cost and quality of health services, as reflected by paid Medicare claims, provided to eligible patients in the SHN vs the HTPN. Results: Medicare payments for hospital, skilled nursing facility, and home health care services were lower for SHN patients than HTPN patients (−32.7%, −19.8%, and −23.8%, respectively, p≤0.05). SHN patients had a lower likelihood of admission to hospitals for treatment of five “ambulatory care sensitive conditions” (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.58–0.81), and they were less likely to receive several preventive services. Total Medicare payments for the two cohorts did not differ significantly. Conclusions: Interdisciplinary outpatient geriatric care in a FFS setting has the potential to avert hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions and to reduce Medicare payments for hospital, skilled nursing facility, and home health care services.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boult C, Boult L, Pacala J. Systems of care for older populations of the future. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46: 499–505.
Redelmeier DA, Tan SH, Booth GL. The treatment of unrelated disorders in patients with chronic medical diseases. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1516–20.
Rothman AA, Wagner EH. Chronic illness management: What is the role of primary care? Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 256–61.
Ostbye T, Yamall KS, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care? Ann Fam Med 2005; 3: 209–14.
Wagner EH. The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. BMJ 2000; 320: 569–72.
Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T. A primary care home for Americans: Putting the house in order. JAMA 2002; 288: 889–93.
Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD, Adams J, Rubenstein LZ. Comprehensive geriatric assessment: A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 1993; 342: 1032–6.
Cohen HJ, Feussner JR, Weinberger M et al. A controlled trial of inpatient and outpatient geriatric evaluation and management. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 905–12.
Schraeder C, Shelton P, Sager M. The effects of a collaborative model of primary care on the mortality and hospital use of community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 56: M106-12.
Boult C, Boult LB, Morishita L, Dowd B, Kane RL, Urdangarin CF. A randomized clinical trial of outpatient geriatric evaluation and management. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49: 351–9.
Burns R, Nichols LO, Martindale-Adams J, Graney MJ. Interdisciplinary geriatric primary care evaluation and management: Two-year outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48: 8–13.
Reuben DB, Frank JC, Hirsch SH, McGuigan KA, Maly RC. A randomized clinical trial of outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment coupled with an intervention to increase adherence to recommendations. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999; 47: 269–76.
Yeo G, Ingram L, Skurnick J, Crapo L. Effects of a geriatric clinic on functional health and well-being of elders. J Gerontol 1987; 42: 252–8.
Sommers LS, Marton KI, Barbaccia JC, Randolph J. Physician, nurse, and social worker collaboration in primary care for chronically ill seniors. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 1825–33.
Silverman M, Musa D, Martin DC, Lave JR, Adams J, Ricci EM. Evaluation of outpatient geriatric assessment: a randomized multi-site trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 733–40.
Tulloch AJ, Moore V. A randomized controlled trial of geriatric screening and surveillance in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract 1979; 29: 733–40.
Engelhardt JB, Toseland RW, O’Donnell JC, Richie JT, Jue D, Banks S. The effectiveness and efficiency of outpatient geriatric evaluation and management. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44: 847–56.
Epstein AM, Hall JA, Fretwell M et al. Consultative geriatric assessment for ambulatory patients. A randomized trial in a health maintenance organization 4. JAMA 1990; 263: 538–44.
Rubin CD, Sizemore MT, Loftis PA, Adams-Huet B, Anderson RJ. The effect of geriatric evaluation and management on Medicare reimbursement in a large public hospital: A randomized clinical trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 989–95.
Williams ME, Williams TF, Zimmer JG, Hall WJ, Podgorski CA. How does the team approach to outpatient geriatric evaluation compare with traditional care: A report of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 1987; 35: 1071–8.
Weissman JS, Gatsonis C, Epstein AM. Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland. JAMA 1992; 268: 2388–94.
Culler SD, Parchman ML, Przybylski M. Factors related to potentially preventable hospitalizations among the elderly. Med Care 1998; 36: 804–17.
Kozak LJ, Hall MJ, Owings MF. Trends in avoidable hospitalizations, 1980–1998. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001; 20: 225–32.
Diehr P, Yanez D, Ash A, Hornbrook M, Lin DY. Methods for analyzing health care utilization and costs. Annu Rev Public Health 1999; 20: 125–44.
Blustein J, Hanson K, Shea S. Preventable hospitalizations and socioeconomic status. Health Aff (Millwood) 1998; 17: 177–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Famadas, J.C., Frick, K.D., Haydar, Z.R. et al. The effects of interdisciplinary outpatient geriatrics on the use, costs and quality of health services in the fee-for-service environment. Aging Clin Exp Res 20, 556–561 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324884
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324884