Skip to main content
Log in

Capabilities and Well-Being: Evidence Based on the Sen–Nussbaum Approach to Welfare

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most significant theoretical contributions to welfare analysis across a range of disciplines has been the development of the capabilities framework by Sen and others. Motivated by the claim that freedom should play a key role in social evaluation, the capabilities framework suggests that we consider what it is that people are free to do, as well as what they actually do. Using data from the British Household Panel Survey in conjunction with a list of substantial values posited by Martha Nussbaum, we contribute to the operationalisation and testing of this approach. Specifically, we suggest that commonly used secondary data sources do provide some information about the capabilities people have and that this can be incorporated into models of (subjective) well-being such as those used by a growing number of labour and health economists. We find evidence that a wide range of capabilities exhibit statistically significant relations to well-being that the relations are complex and slightly different for men and women, and conclude with suggestions for future developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • S. Alkire (2002) Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Anand (1993) ArticleTitleThe philosophy of intransitive preference Economic Journal 103 337–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, P. and M. van Hees: 2003, ‘Capabilities and achievements’, Discussion Paper. The Open University

  • J. Angrist Kreuger (2001) ArticleTitleInstrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 69–85

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Argyle (2001) The Psychology of Happiness EditionNumber2 Routledge Hove

    Google Scholar 

  • A.B. Atkinson (1999) ArticleTitleThe contributions of Amartya Sen to welfare economics Scandinavian Journal of Economics 101 173–190 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-9442.00151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D.G. and A.J. Oswald: 2000, ‘Well-being over time in Britain and the USA’, Working Paper 7487, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Available at www.nber.org/papers/w7487

  • Brandolini, A. and G.D’Alessio: 1998, ‘Measuring well-being in the functioning space’, paper given in the 12th World Congress of the International Economic Association, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • British Household Panel Survey (computer file) SN4505, 2002, Economic and Social Research Council Research Centre on Micro-Social Change, Essex: UK Data Archive (distributor), 10 April

  • H. Cantril (1965) The Pattern of Human Concerns Rutgers University Press New Brunswick, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Carter (1999) A Measure of Freedom Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • A.E. Clark A.J. Oswald (1994) ArticleTitleUnhappiness and unemployment Economic Journal. 104 648–659

    Google Scholar 

  • A.E. Clark A.J. Oswald (1996) ArticleTitleSatisfaction and comparison income Journal of Public Economics 61 359–381 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0047-2727(95)01564-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Diener E.M. Suh R.E. Lucas H.L. Smith (1999) ArticleTitleSubjective well-being: Three decades of progress Psychological Bulletin 125 276–302 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.S. Frey A. Stutzer (2002) Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Human Wellbeing Princeton University Press Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • R.A. Easterlin (2001) ArticleTitleIncome and happiness: Towards a unified theory The Economic Journal 111 465–484 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0297.00646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Gasper (1997) ArticleTitleSen’s capability approach and Nussbaum’s capability ethics Journal of International Development 9 281–302 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199703)9:2<281::AID-JID438>3.3.CO;2-B

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.-G. Gerdtham M. Johannesson (2001) ArticleTitleThe relationship between happiness, health and socioeconomic factors: Results based on Swedish micro data Journal of Socio-Economics 30 553–557 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1053-5357(01)00118-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.P. Goldberg (1972) The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire Oxford University Press London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J.A.: 1978 `Specification texts on econometrics', Econometrica 46, pp. 1251–1271

  • D. Kahneman E. Diener E. Diener (Eds) (1999) Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology Russell Sage Foundation New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R.: 2003, Happiness: Has Social Science a Clue? Lionel Robbins Memorial Lectures (3–5 March), London School of Economics, Available at http://cep.lse.ac.uk/events/lectures/layard/RL030303.pdf

  • D. Lykken A. Tellegen (1996) ArticleTitleHappiness is a stochastic phenomenon Psychological Science 7 180–189

    Google Scholar 

  • E.C. Martinetti (2000) ArticleTitleA multidimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen’s functioning approach Revista Internazionale di Scienze Social 108 207–239

    Google Scholar 

  • M.C. Nussbaum (2001) ArticleTitleSymposium on Amartya Sen’s Philosophy: 5 Adaptive preferences and women’s options Economics and Philosophy 17 67–88 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0266267101000153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.C. Nussbaum (2000) Women and Human Development – The Capabilities Approach Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Qizilbash, M.: `Capabilities, well-being and human development: A survey', Journal of Development Studies 33, pp. 143–162.

  • I. Robeyns (2003) ArticleTitleSen’s capability approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilities Feminist Economics 9 61–92 Occurrence Handle10.1080/1354570022000078024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. and F. Strack: 1999, ‘Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications’, in Kahneman, et al. (eds.), pp. 61–84

  • A.K. Sen (1977) ArticleTitleSocial choice theory: A re-examination Econometrica 45 53–89

    Google Scholar 

  • A.K. Sen (1979) ArticleTitlePersonal utilities and public judgements, or What’s wrong with welfare economics? Economic Journal 89 537–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K.: 1985, Commodities and Capabilities (North-Holland, Amsterdam)

  • A.K. Sen (1999) Development as Freedom Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • T.N. Srinivasan (1994) ArticleTitleHuman development: A new paradigm or reinvention of the wheel? The American Economic Review 84 238–243

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Starmer (2000) ArticleTitleDevelopments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk Journal of Economic Literature XXXVIII 332–382

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Stewart (1995) ArticleTitleBasic needs, capabilities and human development’ in Festschrift for Amartya Sen Greek Economic Review 17 83–96

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sugden (1993) ArticleTitleWelfare, resources, and capabilities: A review of Inequality Re-examined by Amartya Sen Journal of Economic Literature XXXVI 1947–1962

    Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, B.M.S. and P. Frijters: 1999, ‘The measurement of welfare and well-being – the Leyden approach’, in Kahneman et al

  • R. Veenhoven (1994) Correlates of Happiness (3 Vols) RISBO, Centre for Socio-Cultural Transformations Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Veenhoven (1997) ArticleTitleAdvances in understanding happiness Revue Quebecoise de Psychologie 1997 29–74

    Google Scholar 

  • World Values Study Group: 1994, World Value Survey, 1981–1984 and 1990–1993, Arbor, A., Michigan, Institute for Social Research, University

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Anand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anand, P., Hunter, G. & Smith, R. Capabilities and Well-Being: Evidence Based on the Sen–Nussbaum Approach to Welfare. Soc Indic Res 74, 9–55 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-6518-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-6518-z

Key words

Navigation