Skip to main content
Log in

Doctor discontent

A comparison of physician satisfaction in different delivery system settings, 1986 and 1997

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the differences in physician satisfaction associated with open- versus closed-model practice settings and to evaluate changes in physician satisfaction between 1986 and 1997. Open-model practices refer to those in which physicians accept patients from multiple health plans and insurers (i.e., do not have an exclusive arrangement with any single health plan). Closed-model practices refer to those wherein physicians have an exclusive relationship with a single health plan (i.e., staff- or group-model HMO).

DESIGN: Two cross-sectional surveys of physicians; one conducted in 1986 (Medical Outcomes Study) and one conducted in 1997 (Study of Primary Care Performance in Massachusetts).

SETTING: Primary care practices in Massachusetts.

PARTICIPANTS: General internists and family practitioners in Massachusetts.

MEASUREMENTS: Seven measures of physician satisfaction, including satisfaction with quality of care, the potential to achieve professional goals, time spent with individual patients, total earnings from practice, degree of personal autonomy, leisure time, and incentives for high quality.

RESULTS: Physicians in open- versus closed-model practices differed significantly in several aspects of their professional satisfaction. In 1997, open-model physicians were less satisfied than closed-model physicians with their total earnings, leisure time, and incentives for high quality. Open-model physicians reported significantly more difficulty with authorization procedures and reported more denials for care. Overall, physicians in 1997 were less satisfied in every aspect of their professional life than 1986 physicians. Differences were significant in three areas: time spent with individual patients, autonomy, and leisure time (P≤.05). Among open-model physicians, satisfaction with autonomy and time with individual patients were significantly lower in 1997 than 1986 (P≤.01). Among closed-model physicians, satisfaction with total earnings and with potential to achieve professional goals were significantly lower in 1997 than in 1986 (P≤.01).

CONCLUSIONS: This study finds that the state of physician satisfaction in Massachusetts is extremely low, with the majority of physicians dissatisfied with the amount of time they have with individual patients, their leisure time, and their incentives for high quality. Satisfaction with most areas of practice declined significantly between 1986 and 1997. Open-model physicians were less satisfied than closed-model physicians in most aspects of practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kassirer JP. Doctor discontent. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1543–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Collins KS, Schoen C, Sandman DR. The Commonwealth Fund survey of physician experiences with managed care. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hadley J, Mitchell JM. Effects of HMO market penetration on physicians’ work effort and satisfaction. Health Aff (Millwood). 1997;16(6):89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koleszar A. National survey: how satisfied are doctors with medicine? Physician Manage. 1986;August:19–25.

  5. Kerr EA, Hays RD, Mittman BS, et al. Primary care physicians satisfaction with quality of care in California capitated medical groups. JAMA. 1997;278:308–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kassirer JP. Doctor discontent (letters in response). N Engl J Med. 1999;340:652–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lichtenstein R. The job satisfaction and retention of physicians in organized settings: literature review. Med Care Rev. 1984;41:139–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mick SS, Sussman S, Anderson-Selling L, et al. Physician turnover in eight New England prepaid group practices: an analysis. Med Care. 1983;21:323–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Linn LS, Yager J, Cope D, Leake B. Health status, job satisfaction, job stress, and life satisfaction among academic and clinical faculty. JAMA. 1985;254:2775–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Gandek B, Rogers WH, Ware JE Jr. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:497–504.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Probst J, Greenhouse D, Selassie A. Patient and physician satisfaction with an outpatient care visit. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:418–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Linn LS, Brook RH, Clark VA, Davies AR, Fink A, Kosecoff J. Physician and patient satisfaction as factors related to the organization of internal medicine group practices. Med Care. 1985;23:1171–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huff C. Doctors who just say no. Hosp Health Networks. 1998;August:69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abelson R. A medical resistance movement: as independence fades, doctors fight care plans. New York Times. 1998 March 25; Sect. Business/Financial.

  15. Tye L. Disability claims by doctors soaring: physicians leave for big payments. Boston Globe. 1998 March 29; Sect A: 1.

  16. Pincus CR. Have doctors lost their work ethic? Physicians’ disability claims increase. Med Econ. 1995;72:24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mawardi BH. Satisfactions, dissatisfactions, and causes of stress in medical practice. JAMA. 1979;241:1483–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Clarke TA, Maniscalco WM, Taylor-Brown S, et al. Job satisfaction and stress among neonatologists. Pediatrics. 1984;74:52–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mechanic D. The organization of medical practice and practice orientations among physicians in prepaid and nonprepaid primary care settings. Med Care. 1975;13:189–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McCranie EW, Hornsby JL, Calvert JC. Practice and career satisfaction among residency trained family physicians: a national survey. J Fam Pract. 1982;14:1107–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Krakowski AJ, Stress and the practice of medicine: II. Stressors, stresses and strains. Psychother Psychosom. 1982;38:11–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Levinson W, Stiles W, Inui T, Engle R. Physician frustration in communicating with patients. Med Care. 1993;31:285–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McCue JD. The effects of stress on physicians and their medical practice. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:458–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Colby D. Doctors and their discontents. Health Aff (Millwood). 1997;16:112–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Reames HR, Dunstone DC. Professional satisfaction of physicians. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:1951–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schulz R, Scheckler WE, Girard C, Barker K. Physician adaptation to health maintenance organizations and implications for management. Health Serv Res. 1990;25:43–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Skolnik NS, Smith DR, Diamond J. Professional satisfaction and dissatisfaction of family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1993;37:257–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schulz R, Girard C, Scheckler WE. Physician satisfaction in a managed care environment. J Fam Pract. 1992;34:298–304.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schulz R, Schulz C. Management practices, physician autonomy, and satisfaction. Evidence from mental health institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany. Med Care. 1988;26:750–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Warren MG, Weitz R, Kulis S. Physician satisfaction in a changing health care environment: the impact of challenges to professional autonomy, authority and dominance. J Health Soc Behav. 1998;39:356–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Engel GV. The effect of bureaucracy on the professional autonomy of the physician. J Health Soc Behav. 1969;10:30–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Donelan K, Blendon RJ, Lundberg GD, et al. The new medical marketplace: physicians’ views. Health Aff (Millwood). 1997;16:139–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ahern M. Survey of Florida physicians. Characteristics and satisfaction. J Fla Med Assoc. 1993;80:752–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Linzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, et al. Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the physician worklife study. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;14:441–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nadler E, Sims S, Tyrance P, Fairchild D, Brennan T, Bates D. Does a year make a difference? Changes in physician satisfaction and perception in an increasingly capitated environment. Am J Med. 1999;107:38–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Schulz R, Scheckler WE, Moburg DP, Johnson PR. Changing nature of physician satisfaction with health maintenance organization and fee-for-service practices. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:321–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Barr D. The effects of organizational structure on primary care outcomes under managed care. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:353–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kassirer JP. Managed care and the morality of the new marketplace. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:50–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kassirer JP. Managing care—should we adopt a new ethic? N Engl J Med. 1998;339:397–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ayanian JZ, Landrum MB, Normand SL, et al. Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography—do practicing physicians agree with an expert panel and with each other? N Engl J Med 1998;338:1896–904.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christikas NA, et al. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:1129–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Rogers WH, McGlynn E, Berry SH, et al. Methods of sampling. In: Stewart AL, Ware JE, eds. Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press; 1992;27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  43. McGlynn E. Physician job satisfaction: its measurement and use as an indicator of system performance. Rand Corporation Working Paper (WD-4061-1-RWJ/HJK/PCT/NCHSR/NIA). Santa Monica, Calif: Rand Corporation; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Grumbach K, Osmond D, Vranizan K, et al. Primary care physicians’ experience of financial incentives in managed-care systems. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1516–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sibbald B, Enzer I, Cooper C, et al. GP job satisfaction in 1987, 1990 and 1998: lessons for the future? Fam Pract. 2000;17(5):364–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Murray MD, MPH.

Additional information

This research was supported by grant number R01 HS08841 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (formerly the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research) and by grant number 035321 from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Funding from those sources permitted us to obtain survey data from Massachusetts primary care physicians in February 1997 and to analyze them, along with Medical Outcomes Study data, for this article. The Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) physician survey data used for these analyses were obtained in 1986 through a generous grant from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murray, A., Montgomery, J.E., Chang, H. et al. Doctor discontent. J GEN INTERN MED 16, 451–459 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-001-0040-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-001-0040-z

Key Words

Navigation