Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient and Physician Beliefs About Control over Health: Association of Symmetrical Beliefs with Medication Regimen Adherence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Past work suggests that the degree of similarity between patient and physician attitudes may be an important predictor of patient-centered outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the extent to which patient and provider symmetry in health locus of control (HLOC) beliefs was associated with objectively derived medication refill adherence in patients with co-morbid diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HTN).

PARTICIPANTS

Eighteen primary care physicians at the VA Iowa City Medical Center and affiliated clinics; 246 patients of consented providers with co-morbid DM and HTN.

DESIGN

Established patient-physician dyads were classified into three groups according to the similarity of their HLOC scores (assessed in parallel). Data analysis utilized hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to account for clustering of patients within physicians.

MAIN MEASURES

Objectively derived medication refill adherence was computed using data from the VA electronic pharmacy record; blood pressure and HgA1c values were considered as secondary outcomes.

KEY RESULTS

Physician-patient dyads holding highly similar beliefs regarding the degree of personal control that individual patients have over health outcomes showed significantly higher overall and cardiovascular medication regimen adherence (p = 0.03) and lower diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.02) than in dyads in which the patient held a stronger belief in their own personal control than did their treating physician. Dyads in which patients held a weaker belief in their own personal control than did their treating physician did not differ significantly from symmetrical dyads. The same pattern was observed after adjustment for age, physician sex, and physician years of practice.

CONCLUSIONS

These data are the first to demonstrate the importance of attitudinal symmetry on an objective measure of medication adherence and suggest that a brief assessment of patient HLOC may be useful for tailoring the provider’s approach in the clinical encounter or for matching patients to physicians with similar attitudes towards care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krupat E, Yeager CM, Putnam S. Patient role orientations, doctor-patient fit, and visit satisfaction. Psychol Health. 2000;15:707–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making: A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:531–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Swenson SL, Buell S, Zettler P, et al. Patient centered communication: Do patients really prefer it? J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:1069–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cvengros JA, Christensen AJ, Hillis SL, Rosenthal GE. Patient and physician attitudes in the healthcare context: Attitudinal symmetry predicts patient satisfaction and adherence. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33:262–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Krupat E, Bell RA, Kravitz RL, et al. When physicians and patients think alike: patient-centered beliefs and their impact on satisfaction and trust. J Fam Pract. 2001;50:1057–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krupat E, Rosenkranz SL, Yeager CM, et al. The practice orientations of physicians and patients: Effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39:49–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jhang KH, Martin LR, Golin CE, DiMAtteo MR. Preferences for medical collaboration: Patient-physician congruence and patient outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:308–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wallston KA, Wallston BS, DeVellis R. Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales. Health Educ Monogr. 1978;6:160–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wallston KA. Overview of the special issue on research with the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales. J Health Psychol. 2005;10:619–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Christensen AJ, Turner CW, Smith TW, et al. Health locus of control and depression in end-stage renal disease. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59:419–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang PS, Bener JS, Glynn RJ, et al. How well do patients report noncompliance with antihypertensive medications? A comparison of self report versus filled prescriptions. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004;13:11–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mooradian AD. Cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Current managment guidelines. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:33–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vijan S, Hayward RA. Treatment of hypertension in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Blood pressure goals, choice of agents, and setting priorities in diabetes care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:593–602.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Curb JD, Pressel SL, Cutler JA, et al. Effect of diuretic-based antihypertensive treatment on cardiovascular disease risk in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program Cooperative Research Group. JAMA. 1996;276:1886–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. Br Med J. 1998;317:703–13.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kjeldsen SE, Hedner T, Jamerson K, et al. Hypertension optimal treatment (HOT) study: Home blood pressure in treated hypertensive subjects. Hypertension. 1998;31:1014–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Makoul G. Perpetuating passivity: Reliance and reciprocal determinism in physician-patient interaction. J Health Comm. 1998;3:233–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Callahan EJ, Bertakis KD, Azari R, et al. The influence of patient age on primary care resident physician-patient interaction. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:30–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bertakis KD, Azari R, Callahan EJ, Robbins JA, Helms LJ. Comparison of primary care resident physicians’ practice styles during initial and return patient visits. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:495–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975;23:433–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Steiner JF, Koepsell TD. Fihn, SD, Inui TS. A general method of compliance assessment using centralized pharmacy records. Med Care. 1988;26:814–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Billups SJ, Malone DC, Carter BL. The relationship between drug therapy noncompliance and patient characteristics, health-related quality of life, and health care costs. Pharmacotherapy. 2000;20:941–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cvengros JA, Christensen AJ, Hillis SH, Kaboli, P. Patient preference for and reports of provider behavior: Impact of symmetry on adherence, satisfaction, and glycemic control. Health Psychol 2009 (In press).

  24. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Medical Care. 2003;5:582–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sloan JA, Dueck A. Issues for statisticians in conducting analyses and translating results for quality of life endpoints in clinical trials. J Biopharm Stat. 2004;14:73–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brehm JW. The theory of psychological reactance. New York: Wiley; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Christensen AJ. Patient adherence to medical treatment regimens. Yale University Press; 2004.

  29. Van den Brink-Muinen A, Van Dulmen S, Messerli-Rohrbach V, Bensing J. Do gender-dyads have different communication patterns? A comparative study in Western-European general practices. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:253–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Callahan EJ, Bertakis KD, Azari R, et al. The influence of patient age on primary care resident physician-patient interactions. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:30–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Krupat E, Hsu J, Irish J, et al. Matching patients and practitioners based on beliefs about care: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10:814–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lewin SA,Skea Z, Entwistle VA, et al. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centered approach in clinical consultations. Cochrance Database Syst Rev 2001;4:Art.No.:CD003267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003267.

  33. Laine C, Newschaffer CJ, Zhang D, et al. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy by pregnant women infected with human immunodeficiency virus: a pharmacy claims-based analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:167–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Saunders K, Simon G, Bush T, Grothaus L. Assessing the feasibility of using computerized pharmacy refill data to monitor antidepressant treatment on a population basis: A comparison of automated and self-report data. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:883–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hansen RA, Kim MM, Song L, et al. Comparison of methods to assess medication adherence and classify nonadherence. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43:413–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Halpern MT, Khan ZM, Schimer JK, et al. Recommendations for evaluating compliance and persistence with hypertension therapy using retrospective data. Hypertension. 2006;47:1039–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research reported here was supported in part by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service grant no. IIR04-201 awarded to Dr. Christensen, who is a Senior Scientist in the Center for Research in the Implementation of Innovative Strategies in Practice (CRIISP) in the VA-Iowa City Healthcare System. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs. This project was also supported in part by an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Centers for Education and Research on Therapeutics cooperative agreement no. 5 U18 HSO16094.

There are no potential conflicts of interest for any author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan J. Christensen PhD.

Additional information

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christensen, A.J., Howren, M.B., Hillis, S.L. et al. Patient and Physician Beliefs About Control over Health: Association of Symmetrical Beliefs with Medication Regimen Adherence. J GEN INTERN MED 25, 397–402 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1249-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1249-5

KEY WORDS

Navigation