Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Contraceptive Counseling in Primary Care on Contraceptive Use

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 March 2011

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Whether contraceptive counseling improves contraceptive use is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between contraceptive counseling provided by primary care physicians and patients’ contraceptive use.

DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS

All women aged 18–50 who visited one of four primary care clinics between October 2008 and April 2010 were invited to complete surveys about their visit. Seven to 30 days post visit, participants completed a survey assessing pregnancy intentions, receipt of contraceptive counseling, and use of contraception at last sexual intercourse. Survey data were linked to medical record data regarding contraceptive prescriptions prior to and during the clinic visit. Women were classified as in need of contraceptive counseling if they were sexually active, were not pregnant or trying to get pregnant, and had no evidence of contraceptive use prior to their index clinic visit.

KEY RESULTS

Fifty percent (n = 386) of women were in need of contraceptive counseling at the time of their visit. Those who received contraceptive counseling from a primary care provider were more likely to report use of hormonal contraception when they last had sex (unadjusted OR: 3.83, CI: 2.25–6.52), even after adjusting for age, race, education, income, marital status, pregnancy intentions, and prior pregnancy (adjusted OR: 2.68, CI: 1.48–4.87). Counseling regarding specific types of contraception was associated with an increased use of those methods. For example, counseling regarding hormonal contraceptives was associated with a greater likelihood of use of hormonal methods (adjusted OR: 4.78, CI: 2.51–9.12) and counseling regarding highly effective reversible methods was highly associated with use of those methods (adjusted OR: 18.45, CI: 4.88–69.84). These same relationships were observed for women with prior evidence of contraceptive use.

CONCLUSIONS

Contraceptive counseling in primary care settings is associated with increased hormonal contraceptive use at last intercourse. Increasing provision of contraceptive counseling in primary care may reduce unintended pregnancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38(2):90–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Than LC, et al. Intent to become pregnant as a predictor of exposures during pregnancy: is there a relation? J Reprod Med. 2005;50(6):389–396.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kost K, Landry DJ, Darroch JE. The effects of pregnancy planning status on birth outcomes and infant care. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30(5):223–230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Trussell J, et al. Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States. Contraception. 2009;79(1):5–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Frost JJ, Darroch JE, Remez L. Improving contraceptive use in the United States. Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst), 2008(1): p. 1-8.

  6. Isaacs JN, Creinin MD. Miscommunication between healthcare providers and patients may result in unplanned pregnancies small star, filled. Contraception. 2003;68(5):373–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Force, U.S.P.S.T. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C: U.S. department of Health and Human Services, Office of Public Health and Science, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. 2006.

  8. Taylor D, Levi A, Simmonds K. Reframing unintended pregnancy prevention: a public health model. Contraception. 2010;81(5):363–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moos MK, Bartholomew NE, Lohr KN. Counseling in the clinical setting to prevent unintended pregnancy: an evidence-based research agenda. Contraception. 2003;67(2):115–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirby D. The impact of programs to increase contraceptive use among adult women: a review of experimental and quasi-experimental studies. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008;40(1):34–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Upson K, et al. Factors associated with contraceptive nonuse among US women ages 35-44 years at risk of unwanted pregnancy. Contraception. 2010;81(5):427–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huber, LR, Ersek, JL. Contraceptive use among sexually active university students. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2009. 18(7): p. 1063-70.

  13. Harper, CC, et al. Hormonal contraceptive method choice among young, low-income women: How important is the provider? Patient Educ Couns, 2010.

  14. Henderson JT, Weisman CS, Grason H. Are two doctors better than one? Women's physician use and appropriate care. Womens Health Issues. 2002;12(3):138–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kavanaugh ML, Schwarz EB. Prospective assessment of pregnancy intentions using a single- versus a multi-item measure. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009;41(4):238–243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bruce J. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plann. 1990;21(2):61–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Barber JS, Axinn WG, Thornton A. Unwanted childbearing, health, and mother-child relationships. J Health Soc Behav. 1999;40(3):231–257.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Davison SL, et al. Sexual function in well women: stratification by sexual satisfaction, hormone use, and menopause status. J Sex Med. 2008;5(5):1214–1222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Addis IB, et al. Sexual activity and function in middle-aged and older women. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(4):755–764.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller E, et al. Reproductive coercion: connecting the dots between partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception. 2010;81(6):457–459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Akers AY, et al. Providers' Perspectives on Challenges to Contraceptive Counseling in Primary Care Settings. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2010.

  22. Landry DJ, Wei J, Frost JJ. Public and private providers' involvement in improving their patients' contraceptive use. Contraception. 2008;78(1):42–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data used in this analysis were collected with funding from AHRQ R18HS017093.

Dr. Eleanor Bimla Schwarz was funded by NICHD K23 HD051585.

Conflicts of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleanor Bimla Schwarz MD, MS.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1678-9

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, J.K., Parisi, S.M., Akers, A.Y. et al. The Impact of Contraceptive Counseling in Primary Care on Contraceptive Use. J GEN INTERN MED 26, 731–736 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1647-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1647-3

KEY WORDS

Navigation