ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND
Whether contraceptive counseling improves contraceptive use is unknown.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the association between contraceptive counseling provided by primary care physicians and patients’ contraceptive use.
DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS
All women aged 18–50 who visited one of four primary care clinics between October 2008 and April 2010 were invited to complete surveys about their visit. Seven to 30 days post visit, participants completed a survey assessing pregnancy intentions, receipt of contraceptive counseling, and use of contraception at last sexual intercourse. Survey data were linked to medical record data regarding contraceptive prescriptions prior to and during the clinic visit. Women were classified as in need of contraceptive counseling if they were sexually active, were not pregnant or trying to get pregnant, and had no evidence of contraceptive use prior to their index clinic visit.
KEY RESULTS
Fifty percent (n = 386) of women were in need of contraceptive counseling at the time of their visit. Those who received contraceptive counseling from a primary care provider were more likely to report use of hormonal contraception when they last had sex (unadjusted OR: 3.83, CI: 2.25–6.52), even after adjusting for age, race, education, income, marital status, pregnancy intentions, and prior pregnancy (adjusted OR: 2.68, CI: 1.48–4.87). Counseling regarding specific types of contraception was associated with an increased use of those methods. For example, counseling regarding hormonal contraceptives was associated with a greater likelihood of use of hormonal methods (adjusted OR: 4.78, CI: 2.51–9.12) and counseling regarding highly effective reversible methods was highly associated with use of those methods (adjusted OR: 18.45, CI: 4.88–69.84). These same relationships were observed for women with prior evidence of contraceptive use.
CONCLUSIONS
Contraceptive counseling in primary care settings is associated with increased hormonal contraceptive use at last intercourse. Increasing provision of contraceptive counseling in primary care may reduce unintended pregnancy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38(2):90–96.
Than LC, et al. Intent to become pregnant as a predictor of exposures during pregnancy: is there a relation? J Reprod Med. 2005;50(6):389–396.
Kost K, Landry DJ, Darroch JE. The effects of pregnancy planning status on birth outcomes and infant care. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30(5):223–230.
Trussell J, et al. Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States. Contraception. 2009;79(1):5–14.
Frost JJ, Darroch JE, Remez L. Improving contraceptive use in the United States. Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst), 2008(1): p. 1-8.
Isaacs JN, Creinin MD. Miscommunication between healthcare providers and patients may result in unplanned pregnancies small star, filled. Contraception. 2003;68(5):373–376.
Force, U.S.P.S.T. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C: U.S. department of Health and Human Services, Office of Public Health and Science, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. 2006.
Taylor D, Levi A, Simmonds K. Reframing unintended pregnancy prevention: a public health model. Contraception. 2010;81(5):363–366.
Moos MK, Bartholomew NE, Lohr KN. Counseling in the clinical setting to prevent unintended pregnancy: an evidence-based research agenda. Contraception. 2003;67(2):115–132.
Kirby D. The impact of programs to increase contraceptive use among adult women: a review of experimental and quasi-experimental studies. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008;40(1):34–41.
Upson K, et al. Factors associated with contraceptive nonuse among US women ages 35-44 years at risk of unwanted pregnancy. Contraception. 2010;81(5):427–434.
Huber, LR, Ersek, JL. Contraceptive use among sexually active university students. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2009. 18(7): p. 1063-70.
Harper, CC, et al. Hormonal contraceptive method choice among young, low-income women: How important is the provider? Patient Educ Couns, 2010.
Henderson JT, Weisman CS, Grason H. Are two doctors better than one? Women's physician use and appropriate care. Womens Health Issues. 2002;12(3):138–149.
Kavanaugh ML, Schwarz EB. Prospective assessment of pregnancy intentions using a single- versus a multi-item measure. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009;41(4):238–243.
Bruce J. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plann. 1990;21(2):61–91.
Barber JS, Axinn WG, Thornton A. Unwanted childbearing, health, and mother-child relationships. J Health Soc Behav. 1999;40(3):231–257.
Davison SL, et al. Sexual function in well women: stratification by sexual satisfaction, hormone use, and menopause status. J Sex Med. 2008;5(5):1214–1222.
Addis IB, et al. Sexual activity and function in middle-aged and older women. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(4):755–764.
Miller E, et al. Reproductive coercion: connecting the dots between partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception. 2010;81(6):457–459.
Akers AY, et al. Providers' Perspectives on Challenges to Contraceptive Counseling in Primary Care Settings. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2010.
Landry DJ, Wei J, Frost JJ. Public and private providers' involvement in improving their patients' contraceptive use. Contraception. 2008;78(1):42–51.
Acknowledgements
The data used in this analysis were collected with funding from AHRQ R18HS017093.
Dr. Eleanor Bimla Schwarz was funded by NICHD K23 HD051585.
Conflicts of Interest
None disclosed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1678-9
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J.K., Parisi, S.M., Akers, A.Y. et al. The Impact of Contraceptive Counseling in Primary Care on Contraceptive Use. J GEN INTERN MED 26, 731–736 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1647-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1647-3