ABSTRACT
The patient-centered medical home (PCMH), with its focus on patient-centered care, holds promise as a way to reinvigorate the primary care of patients and as a necessary component of health care reform. While its tenets have been the subject of review, the ethical dimensions of the PCMH have not been fully explored. Consideration of the ethical foundations for the core principles of the PCMH can and should be part of the debate concerning its merits. The PCMH can align with the principles of medical ethics and potentially strengthen the patient–physician relationship and aspects of health care that patients value. Patient choice and these ethical considerations are central and at least as important as the economic and practical arguments in support of the PCMH, if not more so. Further, the ethical principles that support key concepts of the PCMH have implications for the design and implementation of the PCMH. This paper explores the PCMH in light of core principles of ethics and professionalism, with an emphasis both on how the concept of the PCMH may reinforce core ethical principles of medical practice and on further implications of these principles.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Barr M, Ginsburg J, for the American College of Physicians Health and Public Policy Committee. The Advanced Medical Home: A Patient-Centered, Physician-Guided Model of Health Care. American College of Physicians. 2006.
American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, American Osteopathic Association. Joint Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home, March 2007.
Davis K, Schoenbaum SC, Audet AM. A 2020 vision of patient-centered primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:953–7.
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
Institute of Medicine. Envisioning the National Healthcare Quality Report. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:796–804.
Bergeson SC, Dean JD. A systems approach to patient-centered care. JAMA. 2006;296:2848–51.
Picker Insitute Principles of Patient-Centered Care. Accessed at http://pickerinstitute.org/about/picker-principles/on September 22, 2010.
Snyder L. American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism, and Human Rights Committee. American College of Physicians Ethics Manual. Sixth Edition. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:73–104.
Medical Professionalism Project of the ABIM Foundation, ACP-ASIM Foundation, and European Federation of Internal Medicine. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:243–6.
Understanding the Patient-Centered Medical Home. Accessed at http://www.acponline.org/running_practice/pcmh/understanding/index.html on 20 May 2012.
Iglehart JK. A new era of for-profit hospice care—the Medicare benefit. NEJM. 2009;360:2701–3.
Atlas SJ, Grant RW, Ferris TG, Chang Y, Barry MJ. Patient–physician connectedness and quality of primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:325–35.
Bindman AB. Is there a personal doctor in the house? Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:351–2.
Association of American Medical Colleges. The Medical Home. 2008.
Bodenheimer T. Coordinating care—a perilous journey through the health care system. NEJM. 2008;358:1064–71.
American College of Physicians. The Patient Centered Medical Home Neighbor (PCMH-N): The Interface of the Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) with Specialty/Subspecialty Practices. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians; 2010.
DuBose TD, Behrens MT, Berns A, Davis C, Goldfarb S, Hostetter T, et al. The patient-centered medical home and nephrology. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:681–2.
Wilson JF. Massachusetts health care reform is a pioneer effort but complications remain. Ann Int Med. 2009;148:489–92.
Institute of Medicine. Health professions education: a bridge to quality. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.
The potency of team-based interventions for hypertension care. A meta-analysis. Arch Int Med. 2009;169:1748–55.
American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, American Osteopathic Association. Guidelines for Patient-Centered Medical Home Recognition and Accreditation Programs, Feburary 2011. Accessed at www.acponline.org/running_practice/pcmh/understanding/guidelines_pcmh.pdf on on 20 May 2012.
Wynia MK. The risks of rewards in health care: How pay-for-performance could threaten, or bolster, medical professionalism. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:884–7.
Snyder L, Neubauer RL, for the American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee. Pay-for-performance principles that promote patient-centered care: an ethics manifesto. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:792–4.
Mitnick S, Leffler C, Hood VL, for the American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee. Family caregivers, patients and physicians: ethical guidance to optimize relationships. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:255–60.
Mitnick S, Snyder L, for the American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee. Ethical Considerations for the Use of Patient Incentives to Promote Personal Responsibility for Health: West Virginia Medicaid and Beyond. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians; 2010.
Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;10:CD001431.
Wharam JF, Paasche-Orlow MK, Farber NJ, et al. High quality care and ethical pay-for-performance: a Society of General Internal Medicine policy analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:854–9.
Woo B. Primary care—the best job in medicine? NEJM. 2006;359:864–6.
Braddock CH, Snyder L. The doctor will see you shortly: the ethical significance of time for the patient–physician relationship. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:1057–62.
Acknowledgments
Financial support for the development of this position paper came from the ACP operating budget.
*Members of the 2009–2011 American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee: Virginia L. Hood, MBBS, MPH, FACP (Chair 2009–2010); Kesavan Kutty, MD, MACP, FCCP, FRCP (L) (Chair 2010–2011); Joseph J. Fins, MD, FACP (Vice Chair 2009–2011); Jeffrey T. Berger, MD, FACP; Clarence H. Braddock, III, MD, MPH, FACP; CPT. Tatjana P. Calvano, MC, USA; Kathy Faber-Langendoen, MD, FACP; Faith T. Fitzgerald, MD, MACP; Thomas H. Gallagher, MD, FACP; Celine Goetz; Vincent E. Herrin, MD, FACP; Robert G. Luke, MD, MACP; Tanveer P. Mir, MD, MACP; Alejandro Moreno, MD, MPH, JD, FACP, FCLM; Amirala S. Pasha; J. Fred Ralston, Jr., MD, FACP; Michael C. Sha, MD, FACP; Upasna (Mini) Swift, MBBS, FACP; Alexandra Smart, MD; and Barbara J. Turner, MD, FACP. This paper was approved by the ACP Board of Regents on July 30, 2011.
**Members of the 2010–11 Society of General Internal Medicine Ethics Committee: Clarence H. Braddock, III, MD, MPH, FACP (Chair); Eric G. Campbell, MD, PhD; Evelyn C. Chan, MD; Sarah L. Clever, MD, FACP; Matthew DeCamp, MD, PhD; Neil J. Farber, MD, FACP; Thomas H. Gallagher, MD, FACP; Lauris C. Kaldjian, MD, FACP; Eliseo J. Perez-Stable, MD, FACP; Sonja K. Rakowski, MD; Lois Snyder, JD; and Alexia Torke, MD. This paper was approved by the SGIM Council on June 29, 2011
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Additional information
Richard L. Neubauer, MD. Deceased
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braddock, C.H., Snyder, L., Neubauer, R.L. et al. The Patient-Centered Medical Home: An Ethical Analysis of Principles and Practice. J GEN INTERN MED 28, 141–146 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2170-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2170-x