Abstract
Background
The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model aims to provide patient-centered care, lower costs, and improve health outcomes. Medical students have not been meaningfully integrated in this model.
Aim
To test the feasibility of a longitudinal clerkship based on PCMH principles and anchored by PCMH educational objectives.
Setting
Two community-based family medicine clinics, one academic internal medicine clinic, and one pediatric clinic affiliated with an urban medical school.
Participants
56 medical student volunteers.
Program Description
We embedded student teams in existing faculty practices and recruited a high-risk patient panel for each team. Clinical education occurred through a traditional clinic preceptor model and was augmented by 3rd and 4th year students directly observing 1st and 2nd year students. Didactic content included monthly Grand Rounds conferences.
Program Evaluation
Students attended 699 clinics, recruited 273 continuity patients, and participated in 9 Grand Rounds conferences. Student confidence with PCMH principles increased and attitudes regarding continuity were highly positive. “Continuity,” “early clinical exposure,” and “peer teaching” were the most powerful themes expressed by students. Faculty response to the pilot was highly positive.
Discussion
An Education-Centered Medical Home (ECMH) is feasible and is highly rated by students and faculty. Expansion of this model is underway.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative. Joint principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home. Available at: http://www.pcpcc.net/content/joint-principles-patient-centered-medical-home. Accessed January 19, 2013.
American College of Physicians (ACP). Patient-Centered Medical Home. Available at: http://www.acponline.org/running_practice/pcmh/. Accessed January 19, 2013.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Patient Centered Medical Home resource center. Available at: http://www.pcmh.ahrq.gov/portal/server.pt/community/pcmh__home/. Accessed January 19, 2013.
Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T, Grundy P. The outcomes of implementing Patient-Centered Medical Home interventions: A review of the evidence on quality, access and costs from recent prospective evaluation studies. Available at: http://www.pcpcc.net/files/pcmh_evidence_outcomes_2009.pdf. Accessed January 19, 2013.
Cooke M, Irby D, O’Brien B. Educating physicians: A call for reform of medical school and residency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2010.
Baxley E, Dearing J, Esquivel M, et al. Joint principles for the medical education of physicians as preparation for practice in the Patient-Centered Medical Home. Available at: http://www.acponline.org/running_practice/delivery_and_payment_models/pcmh/understanding/educ-joint-principles.pdf Accessed January 19, 2013.
Joo P, Younge R, Jones D, Hove J, Lin S, Burton W. Medical student knowledge of the patient-centered medical home. Fam Med. 2011;43(10):696–701.
Lausen H, Kruse JE, Barnhart AJ, Smith TJ. The patient-centered medical home: a new perspective for the family medicine clerkship. Fam Med. 2011;43(10):718–20.
Cheng A, Loafman M. Make room for teaching in the patient-centered medical home. Fam Med. 2011;43(10):740–2.
Evans D. The patient-centered medical home as a curricular model: medical students need an “educational home”. Acad Med. 2011;86(11):e2.
Mazotti L, O’Brien B, Tong L, Hauer KE. Perceptions of evaluation in longitudinal versus traditional clerkships. Med Educ. 2011;45:464–470.
Konkin J, Suddards C. Creating stories to live by: caring and professional identity formation in a longitudinal integrated clerkship. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2011 Nov 4.
McLaughlin K, Bates J, Konkin J, Woloschuk W, Suddards CA, Regehr G. A comparison of performance evaluations of students on longitudinal integrated clerkships and rotation-based clerkships. Acad Med. 2011;86(10 Suppl):S25–9.
Chen AH, Rittenhouse D. The un-managed system of medicare referrals. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(5):487–9.
Hirsh DA, Ogur B, Thibault GE, Cox M. “Continuity” as an organizing principle for clinical education reform. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(8):858–66.
Newton W, Baxley E, Reid A, Stanek M, Robinson M, Weir S. Improving chronic illness care in teaching practices: learnings from the I3 collaborative. Fam Med. 2011;43(7):495–502.
Bray-Hall S, Schmidt K, Aagaard E. Toward safe hospital discharge: a transitions in care curriculum for medical students. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(8):878–81.
Hirsh D, Gaufberg E, Ogur B, et al. Educational outcomes of the Harvard Medical School-Cambridge Integrated Clerkship: a way forward for medical education. Acad Med. 2012;87(5):643–650.
Poncelet A, Bokser S, Calton B, et al. Development of a longitudinal integrated clerkship at an academic medical center. Med Educ Online. 2011;16:1–10.
Bell SK, Krupat E, Fazio SB, Roberts DH, Schwartzstein RM. Longitudinal pedagogy: a successful response to the fragmentation of the third-year medical student clerkship experience. Acad Med. 2008;83(5):467–75.
Schauer RW, Schieve D. Performance of medical students in a nontraditional rural clinical program, 1998–99 through 2003–04. Acad Med. 2006;81(7):603–7.
Strasser R, Hirsh D. Longitudinal integrated clerkships: transforming medical education worldwide? Med Educ. 2011;45(5):436–7.
Ogrinc G, Mutha S, Irby D. Evidence for longitudinal ambulatory care rotations: a review of the literature. Acad Med. 2002;77(7):688–693.
Wamsley M, Dubowitz N, Kohli P, Cooke M, O’Brien B. Continuity in a longitudinal out-patient attachment for year 3 medical students. Med Educ. 2009;43(9):895–906.
Saultz JW, O’Neill P, Gill JM, et al. Medical student exposure to components of the patient-centered medical home during required ambulatory clerkship rotations: implications for education. Acad Med. 2010;85(6):965–73.
Rosenthal MB, Abrams MK, Bitton A, and the Patient-Centered Medical Home Evaluators’ Collaborative. Recommended core measures for evaluating the Patient-Centered Medical Home: Cost, utilization, and clinical quality. Available at: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/∼/media/Files/Publications/Data%20Brief/2012/1601_Rosenthal_recommended_core_measures_PCMH_v2.pdf. Accessed January 19, 2013.
Teherani A, O’Brien BC, Masters DE, Poncelet AN, Robertson PA, Hauer KE. Burden, responsibility, and reward: preceptor experiences with the continuity of teaching in a longitudinal integrated clerkship. Acad Med. 2009;84(10):S50–3.
Acknowledgments
Contributors
The authors thank Ricardo Rosenkranz, MD, Mark Loafman, MD, Sharon Unti, MD, Jennifer Bierman, MD, John Butter, MD, Stephanie Kerns, and Emily Kern, MD, for their contributions to the ECMH pilot. We also thank Rebecca DeHoek, MD, Alisha Thomas, MD, and Mary Nevin, MD, for their willingness to participate as preceptors in the ECMH pilot and the PCC Community Wellness Center for their support in hosting pilot sites. Finally, we thank Raymond Curry, MD, and John X. Thomas, PhD, for their administrative support.
Funders
Intramural funding was obtained from the Feinberg Academy of Medical Educators, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
Prior presentations
We presented the ECMH pilot as a workshop at the Central Group on Educational Affairs Conference in St. Louis, MO, in 2012.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 21 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henschen, B.L., Garcia, P., Jacobson, B. et al. The Patient Centered Medical Home as Curricular Model: Perceived Impact of the “Education-Centered Medical Home”. J GEN INTERN MED 28, 1105–1109 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2389-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2389-1