Abstract
This essay explores the process and issues related to community collaborative research that involves Native Americans generally, and specifically examines the Navajo Nation’s efforts to regulate research within its jurisdiction. Researchers need to account for both the experience of Native Americans and their own preconceptions about Native Americans when conducting research about Native Americans. The Navajo Nation institutionalized an approach to protecting members of the nation when it took over Institutional Review Board (IRB) responsibilities from the US Indian Health Service (IHS) in 1996. While written regulations for the Navajo Nation IRB are not dissimilar, and in some ways are less detailed than those of the IHS IRB, in practice the Navajo Nation allows less flexibility. Primary examples of this include not allowing expedited review and requiring prepublication review of all manuscripts. Because of its broad mandate, the Navajo Nation IRB may also require review of some projects that would not normally be subject to IRB approval, including investigative journalism and secondary research about Navajo People that does not involve direct data collection from human subjects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dunn C.M. & Chadwick G. (1999) Ethics and federal regulations, in: Protecting Study Volunteers in Research — A Manual for Investigative Sites, CenterWatch, Inc., Boston, Boston, pp. 15–32.
Attneave C.L. (1989) Who has the responsibility? An evolving model to resolve ethical problems in intercultural research, American Indian & Alaska Native Mental Health Research 2(3): 18–24.
Chrisman N.J., Strickland C.J., Powell K., Squeochs M.D. & Yallup M. (1999) Community partnership research with the Yakama Indian Nation, Human Organization 58: 134–141.
Herbert C.P. (1996) Community-based research as a tool for empowerment: the Haida Gwaii diabetes project example, Canadian Journal of Public Health 87: 109–12.
Mihesuah, D.A. (1993) Suggested guidelines for institutions with scholars who conduct research on American Indians, American Indian Culture & Research Journal 17: 131–39.
Fixico D.L. (1998) Ethics and responsibilities in writing American Indian history, in: Mihesuah D.A, ed. Natives and academics: researching and writing about American Indians, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, pp. 84–99.
Norton I.M. & Manson S.M. (1996) Research in American Indian and Alaska native communities: navigating the cultural universe of values and process, Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 64: 856–60.
Schell L.M. & Tarbell A.M. (1998) A partnership study of PCBs and the health of Mohawk youth: lessons from our past and guidelines for our future, Environmental Health Perspectives 106(suppl 3): 833–40.
Wax M.L. (1991) The ethics of research in American Indian communities, American Indian Quarterly 15(4): 431–456.
Minkler M. & Wallerstein N., eds. (2003), Community-based participatory research for health, Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Imprint, San Francisco, CA.
Wronka J.M. (1993) “Science” and indigenous cultures, The Humanistic Psychologist 21: 341–353.
Connors J.L. & Donnellan A.M. (1998) Walk in beauty: western perspectives on disability and Navajo family/cultural resilience, in: Resiliency in Native American and immigrant families, Sage Publications, CA, pp. 159–182.
Freeman W.L. (1988) The role of community in research with stored tissue samples, in: Weir R., ed. Stored tissue samples: ethical, legal, and public policy implications, University of Iowa Press, Iowa City, IA, pp. 267–301.
〈http://www.ihs.gov/PublicInfo/PublicAffairs/Welcome_Info/ThisFacts.asp〉 Indian Health Service (visited May 24, 2004)
Nevada et al. v. Hicks et al. Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. No. 991994. Argued March 21, 2001. Decided June 25, 2001.
Atkinson Trading Co., Inc. v. Shirley et al. Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. No. 00454. Argued March 27, 2001. Decided May 29, 2001.
Allen P.G. (1998) Special problems in teaching Leslie Marmon Silko’s Cerimony, in: Mihesuah D.A., ed. Natives and academics: researching and writing about American Indians, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, pp. 55–64.
Trennert R.A. (1998) Army doctors — western medicine comes to the Navajo, in: White man’s medicine: government doctors and the Navajo, 1863–1955, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 19–37.
〈http://www.lapahie.com/Dine_Treaty.cfm〉 U.S. Treaty with the Navajos, 1868. (visited May 24, 2004)
〈http://www.nnwo.org/nnprofile.htm〉 Navajo Nation Washington Office (visited May 24, 2004)
〈http://www.ihs.gov/medicalprograms/Research/PDF_Files/mpa-IHS2.pdf〉 The Indian Health Service Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) for Compliance with DHHS Regulations for the Protection of Human Subjects (45 CFR 46) as Amended (visited May 24, 2004)
〈http://www.med.umich.edu/irbmed/FederalDocuments/hhs/HHS45CFR46.html〉 Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46 (visited May 24, 2004)
Approving the Navajo Nation Health Research Code, Navajo Nation Council Resolution CO-106-95. Requests could be made to the Navajo HRRB Program, PO Box 1390, Window Rock, AZ 86515 or call 520-871-6925.
Adopting the Navajo Nation Privacy and Access to Information Act, Navajo Nation Council Resolution CAP-48-99. Requests could be made to the Navajo HRRB Program, PO Box 1390, Window Rock, AZ 86515 or call 520-871-6925.
Mitchell R. & Frisbie C.J. ed. (2001) Tall woman: the life story of Rose Mitchell, a Navajo woman, c. 1874–1977, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM.
Carrese J.A. & Rhodes L.A. (1995) Western bioethics on the Navajo reservation: benefit or harm? JAMA 274:826–29.
Prendergast E. (2001) Historic preservation: an unusual way to protect human subjects in research. Protecting Human Subjects. US DOE. Summer 2001 at www.science.doe.gov/ober/humsubj/newslett.html.
Navajo Area Indian Health Service, Research and Publications Committee and Institutional Review Board (IRB) — Project Approval Form, revised 5/21/95.
Navajo Division of Health/Navajo Research Program, Navajo Nation Health Research Review Board (HRRB) — Application and Application Guidelines. Requests could be made to the Navajo HRRB Program, PO Box 1390, Window Rock, AZ 86515 or call 520-871-6925.
AP. (April 24, 1994) Indians reject name linking illness to tribe. The New York Times. P. 21.
Shenk D. (March 22, 1999) Money+science = ethics problems on campus, The Nation, pp. 11–18.
Freeman W.L. (Draft #3,Oct. 17, 1996) Tribal Review of Manuscripts: Suggestions for Tribal Councils and Researchers. Requests could be made directly to Dr. William Freeman at WFreeman@HQE.ihs.gov or call 301-443-0578.
Csordas T. (2000) Introduction to the Navajo Healing Project. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 14: 463–475.
Brugge D. & Benally T. (1998) Navajo Indian voices and faces testify to the legacy of uranium mining, Cultural Survival Quarterly 22(1): 16–19.
Brugge D., Benally T., Harrison P., Austin-Garrison M., Stilwell C., Elsner M., Bomboy K., Johnson H. & Fasthorse-Begay L. (1999) The Navajo Uranium Miner Oral History and Photography Project, in: Piper, J., ed. Dine baa hane bi naaltsoos: collected papers from the seventh through the tenth Navajo Studies Conferences, Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department, Window Rock, AZ, pp. 85–96.
Brugge D. & Goble R. (2002) The history of uranium mining and the Navajo People, American Journal of Public Health 92: 1410–1419.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brugge, D., Missaghian, M. Protecting the Navajo people through tribal regulation of research. SCI ENG ETHICS 12, 491–507 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0047-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0047-2