General articleSmokers' preferences for assistance with cessation
References (13)
Stop-smoking clinics: A case for their abandonment
Lancet
(1985)- et al.
Smoking cessation by mail: A comparison of standard and personalized correspondence course formats
Addict Behav
(1989) Mass media and smoking cessation: A critical review
Am J Public Health
(1987)Smoking and health implications of a change in the Federal Cigarette Excise Tax
JAMA
(1986)- et al.
Format and quitting instructions as factors influencing the impact of a self-administered quit smoking program
Health Educ Q
(1988) - et al.
Self-help smoking cessation and maintenance programs: A comparative study with 12-month follow-up by the American Lung Association
Am J Public Health
(1984)
Cited by (47)
An exploration of the barriers to attendance at the English Stop Smoking Services
2019, Addictive Behaviors ReportsCitation Excerpt :Evidence also indicates that smokers who take advantage of these stop smoking programmes have a greater chance of stopping smoking and remaining abstinent than those who try to quit on their own (West & Stapleton, 2008; Zhu, Melcer, Sun, Rosbrook, & Pierce, 2000). Despite the availability of this effective assistance in quitting, the majority of smokers do not utilise any formal cessation programmes (Fiore et al., 1990; Hughes, Marcy, & Naud, 2009; Lichtenstein & Glasgow, 1992; Owen & Davies, 1990). Instead, approximately half of smokers make an independent, unassisted quit attempt every year with <5% of such attempts being maintained a year later (Cokkinides, Ward, Jemal, & Thun, 2005; Edwards, Bondy, Callaghan, & Mann, 2014; Hughes, Keely, & Naud, 2004).
Perceived cessation treatment effectiveness, medication preferences, and barriers to quitting among light and moderate/heavy homeless smokers
2015, Drug and Alcohol DependenceCitation Excerpt :Indeed, such inquiry is important because research among domiciled smokers suggests differences between light (e.g., commonly defined as an average smoking rate of 1–10 cigarettes per day (CPD)) and moderate/heavy smokers (>10 CPD) on treatment-related factors. For example, one study indicated that heavier smokers preferred individual or group cessation interventions, whereas lighter smokers preferred more indirect approaches (e.g., intervention by video, book, mail; Owen and Davies, 1990). Other studies have reported varying barriers to quitting by smoking rate, with light smokers reporting lower cessation barriers related to tobacco dependence and cravings relative to heavier smoking counterparts (Businelle et al., 2009; Reitzel et al., 2009).
The effect of training on the use of tobacco-use cessation guidelines in dental settings
2012, Journal of the American Dental AssociationCitation Excerpt :In contrast, more than 70 percent of the dentists reported they “often or almost always” asked patients about tobacco use and advised users to quit. Other investigators have reported that providers' self-reports often overestimated performance of tobacco-use cessation counseling.31 They and other investigators speculate that providers' self-reports may be influenced by the Hawthorne effect, because they know that they are study participants.31, 32
Internet-based smoking cessation programs
2006, International Journal of Medical InformaticsA survey of pregnant smokers' interest in different types of smoking cessation support
2004, Patient Education and Counseling