Regular articleMultivariate Analysis-Based Prediction Rule for Pulmonary Embolism
Section snippets
Materials and Methods
Consecutively included were patients admitted to a medical department during 39 months whose initial presentation (history, clinical examination, ECG, blood tests) was sufficiently suggestive for PE that therapeutic heparinisation was initiated (Figure 1). Among the included patients, risk factors (malignancy, previous thrombosis or PE, trauma or surgery within the last 3 months, immobilization>3 days within the last 14 days, oral contraceptives) and symptoms (dyspnoea, chest pain, hemoptysis,
Part 1
Over 19 months, 216 patients (104 males and 112 females) were included, with a mean age of 65 years (range 20–87). Twenty-nine patients (13%) died within 10 days after the suspected pulmonary embolism.
Pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in 46 patients (21%) (PE+); 18 of them by autopsy and 28 of them by pulmonary angiography. PE was excluded in 122 patients (56%) (PE−); 99 of them by a negative perfusion scan, 11 of them by autopsy, and 12 of them by pulmonary angiography. PE was uncertain in 48
Discussion
In part 1 of the study, a prediction rule for PE was derived. This prediction rule contains clinical signs and symptoms (dyspnoea, neck vein distension), results of ECG (right heart strain), chest X-ray, and investigations of the legs. The validation of the prediction rule in different patients of part 2 of the study confirmed the rule's ability to distinguish between PE+ and PE− patients.
To diagnose PE expert systems and decisions, rules have been developed, but a prediction rule has not been
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the Medizinisch-wissenschaftlicher Fonds des Bürgermeisters der Bundeshauptstadt Wien, and through the advice of M.T. Schlern.
References (22)
- et al.
Anticoagulant drugs in the treatment of pulmonary embolism. A controlled trial
Lancet
(1960) - et al.
The electrocardiogram in acute pulmonary embolism
Prog Cardiovasc Dis
(1975) - et al.
Usefulness of noninvasive diagnostic tools for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in patients with a normal chest radiograph
Am J Cardiol
(1991) - et al.
Clinical validity of a normal perfusion lung scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Chest
(1990) - et al.
Neural network in the clinical diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism
Chest
(1993) - et al.
Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
Bleeding complications in oral anticoagulant therapy. An analysis of risk factors
Arch Intern Med
(1993) - et al.
Pulmonary embolismValidation of spiral CT angiography in 149 patients
Radiology
(1996) - et al.
Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography
N Engl J Med
(1997) - et al.
Use of transthoracic Doppler echocardiography combined with clinical and electrocardiographic data to predict acute pulmonary embolism
Eur Heart J
(1996)
Noninvasive diagnosis of suspected severe pulmonary embolism. Transesophageal echocardiography vs spiral CT
Chest
Cited by (24)
Immobilization and the risk of venous thromboembolism. A meta-analysis on epidemiological studies
2009, Thrombosis ResearchCitation Excerpt :cohort studies among patients with suspicion of VTE within hospitalized patients (n = 7) [17–23] cohort studies among patients with suspicion of VTE within ambulatory patients (n = 21) [24–43]. In this group, a validation and a derivation analysis were reported in the same article [30].
Imputation of missing values is superior to complete case analysis and the missing-indicator method in multivariable diagnostic research: A clinical example
2006, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyCitation Excerpt :We analyzed whether the following predictors independently contributed to the prediction of PE presence or absence: age (years), gender (male/female), duration of symptoms (number of days), period confined to bed (number of days), respiratory rate (breaths/min), cardiac rate (beats/min), Quetelet index (kg/m2), arterial oxygen pressure (mmHg), arterial carbon–oxygen pressure (mmHg), the presence (yes/no) of leg paresis, leg pain, a family history of deep venous thrombosis (DVT)/PE, crepitations, fever (temperature above >38.5°C), dyspnea, pleura rub, wheezing, palpitations, collapse with or without unconsciousness, surgery in past 3 months, malignancy, signs of DVT, and of previous history of PE or DVT, leg ultrasound of lower limbs (positive/negative for DVT), and the chest x-ray result (positive/negative for PE). The a priori selection of these predictors was based on previous diagnostic studies [17–19]. There were no missing data for the presence of PE (yes/no; diagnostic outcome variable), whereas there were missing data on various tests or predictors.
Usefulness of clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: A systematic review
2004, American Journal of MedicineGenetic programming outperformed multivariable logistic regression in diagnosing pulmonary embolism
2004, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyWhy is venous thrombosis only rarely detected in patients with suspected paradoxical embolism?
2002, Thrombosis Research