Regular article
Randomized controlled trial of the effects of nurse case manager and community health worker interventions on risk factors for diabetes-related complications in urban African Americans

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-7435(03)00040-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

African Americans suffer disproportionately from diabetes complications, but little research has focused on how to improve diabetic control in this population. There are also few or no data on a combined primary care and community-based intervention approach.

Methods

We randomly assigned 186 urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes (76% female, mean Å SD age 59 Å 9 years) to 1 of 4 parallel arms: (1) usual care only; (2) usual care + nurse case manager (NCM); (3) usual care + community health worker (CHW); (4) usual care + nurse case manager/community health worker team. Using the framework of the Precede–Proceed behavioral model, interventions included patient counseling regarding self-care practices and physician reminders.

Results

The 2-year follow-up visit was completed by 149 individuals (84%). Compared to the Usual care group, the NCM group and the CHW group had modest declines in HbA1c over 2 years (0.3 and 0.3%, respectively), and the combined NCM/CHW group had a greater decline in HbA1c (0.8%. P = 0.137). After adjustment for baseline differences and/or follow-up time, the combined NCM/CHW group showed improvements in triglycerides (−35.5 mg/dl; P = 0.041) and diastolic blood pressure, compared to the usual care group (−5.6 mmHg; P = 0.042).

Conclusions

Combined NCM/CHW interventions may improve diabetic control in urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Although results were clinically important, they did not reach statistical significance. This approach deserves further attention as a means to reduce the excess risk of diabetic complications in African Americans.

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes is responsible for a tremendous public health burden and is associated with long-term complications that lead to serious illness and disability [1]. The burden of type 2 diabetes affects African Americans disproportionately. The prevalence and incidence of diabetes is higher in Blacks than in Whites [2], [3], [4]. Furthermore, the rates of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic nephropathy including ESRD, and lower extremity amputations are also substantially greater in Blacks compared to Whites [2]. Growing evidence suggests that the excess risk of complications in African Americans is modifiable, and that the disparity stems in large part from poorer control of major risk factors like glycemic control and blood pressure [5], [6], [7]. Control of these factors depends on the behaviors of patients (e.g., diet, physical activity) and physicians (e.g., treatment threshold and target), and on the structure of the health care system (e.g., access to care, continuity of care) [3], [8], [9], [10], [11].

Recent evidence from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) [12] and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) [13] suggests that achieving tight glycemic control can substantially reduce the risk of complications. Strong evidence also favors blood pressure control, regular foot care, and smoking cessation [13], [14], [15]. However, the manner by which such knowledge will be translated into clinical practice is still unclear. One approach has been the use of nurses in the clinical setting to supplement diabetes care by providing case management and education [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. Another approach is the use of community health workers to serve as liaisons between the health care system and the family, in addition to providing diabetes education and social services [25], [26], [27]. While these two would appear complementary and potentially synergistic, they have not been tested together. Moreover, they have not been adapted for use in urban African American populations. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to determine whether multifaceted, culturally sensitive, primary care-based behavioral interventions implemented by a nurse case manager (NCM) and/or a community health worker (CHW) could improve HbA1c, a measure of long-term blood glucose control, and other indicators of diabetic control (i.e., lipids and blood pressure) in a sample of urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes.

Section snippets

Study setting and population

Project Sugar 1 was an NIH-funded, randomized controlled trial of primary care-based interventions. The study population consisted of 186 African American adults with type 2 diabetes living in East Baltimore, a predominately African American, inner-city community. Eligibility for the trial was determined by medical chart review and two screening visits. Age (35–75), African American ancestry, presence of type 2 diabetes (as indicated by physician diagnosis), and residence in one of seven East

Baseline characteristics of study participants

Selected baseline characteristics of 149 participants who completed the 2-year follow-up are summarized by randomization group in Table 1. The population was predominately female with a mean age of 59 years, and most had less than a high school education. The majority of participants had extremely modest incomes, and many were dependent on medical assistance or lacked health insurance entirely.

The mean duration of diabetes was 9 years. Ninety-one percent of the participants reported taking

Conclusions

These results suggest that combined NCM/CHW interventions in primary care may produce significant improvements in HbA1c, lipids, and blood pressure. In this intervention group, declines in diastolic blood pressure and triglycerides were statistically significant, and declines in HbA1c were clinically important, although they did not reach statistical significance. Overall, the combined NCM/CHW intervention produced greater effects than the NCM or the CHW intervention alone, and to our surprise,

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Project Sugar 1 staff, particularly Marian Batts-Turner and Yvonne Cummings, and the Johns Hopkins Outpatient General Clinic Research Center staff for support with data collection. We also acknowledge the Project Sugar 1 participants, whose cooperation and involvement made this research possible.

References (42)

  • F.L. Brancati et al.

    Incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in African Americans and White adultsthe atherosclerosis risk in communities study

    JAMA

    (2000)
  • J.C. Konen et al.

    Racial differences in symptoms and complications in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

    Ethn Health

    (1999)
  • R.A. Bell et al.

    Racial differences in psychosocial variables among adults with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

    Behav Med

    (1995)
  • J.S. Krop et al.

    A community-based study of explanatory factors for the excess risk for early renal function decline in Blacks vs Whites with diabetesthe Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study

    Arch intern Med

    (1999)
  • S.J. Kenny et al.

    Survey of physician practice behaviors related to diabetes mellitus in the U.S.physician adherence to consensus recommendations

    Diabetes Care

    (1993)
  • J.P. Weiner et al.

    Variation in office-based qualitya claims-based profile of care provided to medicare patients with diabetes

    J Am Medical Assoc

    (1995)
  • K. Davis

    Inequality and access to health care

    Milbank Q

    (1991)
  • The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

    N Engl J Med

    (1993)
  • Intensive blood–glucose control with sulphonylereas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)

    Lancet

    (1998)
  • Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetesUKPDS 38.

    BMJ

    (1998)
  • R.C. Turner et al.

    Coronary heart disease and risk factors in NIDDM—experience from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study

    Diabetologia

    (1997)
  • Cited by (186)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01-DK48117-04, R01-DK48117-03S1, T32-HL07024) and the Johns Hopkins University Outpatient Department General Clinical Research Center (R00052). The results were presented in part at the 39th American Heart Association Conference on Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Orlando, FL, March 1999; the American Diabetes Association 59th Scientific Sessions, San Diego, CA, June 1999; and the American Public Health Association 128th Annual Meeting, Boston MA, November 2000.

    View full text