Using the stages of change model to counsel victims of intimate partner violence

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(00)00152-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Medical expenses from intimate partner violence (IPV) total between $3 and $5 billion annually. Many abuse victims are exposed to serious injuries, and are likely to see their physicians more frequently than other patients. Practitioners must have a reliable and realistic approach to counseling patients who are victims of IPV. This paper presents the stages of change model as a practical guide for counseling victims. Through patients’ responses to a series of questions, the practitioner can identify which of five stages of change (precontemplation, preparation, contemplation, action, maintenance) the patient is in. The practitioner can then employ stage-specific strategies for counseling the patient. Using this model shifts the definition of successful outcome from the traditional focus of trying to ‘fix the problem’ to a patient-centered focus, working with the patient to explore the most effective strategies given his/her stage of change.

Introduction

Intimate partner violence (IPV) and its health consequences for the entire family are important issues in primary care. “A recent national survey of 6000 families revealed that 50% of the men who frequently assaulted their partners also abused their children, and women who suffer a pattern of abuse are reported twice as likely as other mothers to abuse a child” [1]. Although heterosexual women are the targets of IPV in 95% of reported cases, research also documents abuse of men by women partners, as well as battering among lesbian and gay partners [2], [3], [4]. IPV victims may require medical care, although they often conceal the cause of their injuries. Studies report that battered women, for example, comprise 20–30% of ambulatory care patients, yet only 1 in 20 is correctly identified as such by medical providers [5], [6]. Screening for these patients is, therefore, a critical issue.

Research has shown that the following questions, posed by any health care provider in a supportive and non-judgmental environment, can identify about 65% of patients who are abuse victims [7]: “Have you been hit, kicked, punched or otherwise physically hurt by someone in the past year? If so, by whom?” Not withstanding the importance of screening, a major question for providers is what to do after a patient has been identified as a victim of IPV.

Section snippets

Methods

A pilot curriculum was introduced in 1994 to help the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill Family Practice residents (n=20) correctly identify, counsel, and refer patients who are victims of IPV. The curriculum consisted of four content areas: (1) should we screen for partner abuse? (2) epidemiology and dynamics of IPV; (3) community resources in the management of IPV victims and their family members and (4) diagnosing and treating victims of abuse. This paper focuses on an

Stages of change model

People who successfully make changes in their lives progress along a continuum of predictable stages: (1) precontemplation — not aware of, or minimizing the problem; (2) contemplation — acknowledging the problem and considering possible changes; (3) preparation — making plans; (4) action — following through with plans and (5) maintenance — keeping the new actions as a part of daily activity.

Activities and experiences that individuals employ when they attempt to modify their situation accompany

Assessment of partner abuse victims’ ‘readiness’ for change

Prior to this pilot in the residency curriculum, no published evidence existed on the use of the stages of change paradigm to counsel victims of IPV. However, by understanding the characteristics of and interventions for each stage of change, primary care physicians can help IPV victims work towards a safe response to their current situation. How should the clinician implement this approach? The victim’s readiness for change is a key determinant in the counseling and referral process. Change

Recommended interventions for each stage of change

These recommendations are based on two of the authors’ experiences with IPV victims.

Summary

In this paper, we have presented a framework and implementation strategies using the stages of change model for physicians to use in diagnosing and addressing the concerns of patients who are victims of IPV. This framework is based on an existing model previously employed by other disciplines and recently introduced to the medical profession. Our experience with the implementation of a pilot curriculum that featured the stages of change algorithm is limited. However, we feel that this model,

References (11)

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Coordinated community responses to prevent intimate partner violence,...
  • C. Blakrishnan et al.

    Burns in men secondary to spouse abuse

    J. Burn Care Rehabil.

    (1994)
  • P. Letellier

    Gay and bisexual male domestic violence victimization: challenges to feminist theory and responses to violence

    Violence Vict.

    (1994)
  • V.E. Coleman

    Lesbian battering: the relationship between personality and the perpetration of violence

    Violence Vict.

    (1994)
  • L.K. Hamberger et al.

    Prevalence of domestic violence in a community practice and rate of physician inquiry

    Fam. Med.

    (1992)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (65)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text