Using the stages of change model to counsel victims of intimate partner violence
Introduction
Intimate partner violence (IPV) and its health consequences for the entire family are important issues in primary care. “A recent national survey of 6000 families revealed that 50% of the men who frequently assaulted their partners also abused their children, and women who suffer a pattern of abuse are reported twice as likely as other mothers to abuse a child” [1]. Although heterosexual women are the targets of IPV in 95% of reported cases, research also documents abuse of men by women partners, as well as battering among lesbian and gay partners [2], [3], [4]. IPV victims may require medical care, although they often conceal the cause of their injuries. Studies report that battered women, for example, comprise 20–30% of ambulatory care patients, yet only 1 in 20 is correctly identified as such by medical providers [5], [6]. Screening for these patients is, therefore, a critical issue.
Research has shown that the following questions, posed by any health care provider in a supportive and non-judgmental environment, can identify about 65% of patients who are abuse victims [7]: “Have you been hit, kicked, punched or otherwise physically hurt by someone in the past year? If so, by whom?” Not withstanding the importance of screening, a major question for providers is what to do after a patient has been identified as a victim of IPV.
Section snippets
Methods
A pilot curriculum was introduced in 1994 to help the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill Family Practice residents (n=20) correctly identify, counsel, and refer patients who are victims of IPV. The curriculum consisted of four content areas: (1) should we screen for partner abuse? (2) epidemiology and dynamics of IPV; (3) community resources in the management of IPV victims and their family members and (4) diagnosing and treating victims of abuse. This paper focuses on an
Stages of change model
People who successfully make changes in their lives progress along a continuum of predictable stages: (1) precontemplation — not aware of, or minimizing the problem; (2) contemplation — acknowledging the problem and considering possible changes; (3) preparation — making plans; (4) action — following through with plans and (5) maintenance — keeping the new actions as a part of daily activity.
Activities and experiences that individuals employ when they attempt to modify their situation accompany
Assessment of partner abuse victims’ ‘readiness’ for change
Prior to this pilot in the residency curriculum, no published evidence existed on the use of the stages of change paradigm to counsel victims of IPV. However, by understanding the characteristics of and interventions for each stage of change, primary care physicians can help IPV victims work towards a safe response to their current situation. How should the clinician implement this approach? The victim’s readiness for change is a key determinant in the counseling and referral process. Change
Recommended interventions for each stage of change
These recommendations are based on two of the authors’ experiences with IPV victims.
Summary
In this paper, we have presented a framework and implementation strategies using the stages of change model for physicians to use in diagnosing and addressing the concerns of patients who are victims of IPV. This framework is based on an existing model previously employed by other disciplines and recently introduced to the medical profession. Our experience with the implementation of a pilot curriculum that featured the stages of change algorithm is limited. However, we feel that this model,
References (11)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Coordinated community responses to prevent intimate partner violence,...
- et al.
Burns in men secondary to spouse abuse
J. Burn Care Rehabil.
(1994) Gay and bisexual male domestic violence victimization: challenges to feminist theory and responses to violence
Violence Vict.
(1994)Lesbian battering: the relationship between personality and the perpetration of violence
Violence Vict.
(1994)- et al.
Prevalence of domestic violence in a community practice and rate of physician inquiry
Fam. Med.
(1992)
Cited by (65)
Motivational interviewing and intimate partner violence: A randomized trial
2014, Annals of EpidemiologyCitation Excerpt :The intervention's impact was assessed as progression in women's “stage-of-readiness-to-change,” derived from the trans-theoretical model [24]. Our stage-of-readiness-to-change tool was adapted from Burke et al. [25] and based on research showing that the trans-theoretical model is consistent with how women describe surviving their abusive relationships [25–28]. Subjects were asked: “Are you currently taking any steps that will help you to end, reduce, or cope with your partner's controlling, abusive, or violent behavior?”
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in Bhutan: Understanding Women’s Responses to IPV Using the Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change
2022, Journal of Interpersonal ViolencePractical Implications of Research on Intimate Partner Violence Experiences for the Mental Health Clinician
2022, Current Treatment Options in PsychiatryUsing the Stages of Change to Counsel Victims of Intimate Partner Violence
2022, Family Journal