Original Articles
Testing the Measurement Properties of the Short Form-36 Health Survey in a Frail Elderly Population

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00061-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) is a widely used measure of health-related quality of life, however, its suitability for frail older persons is not well documented. This study examines the measurement properties of the SF-36 in a frail older patient population. Patients consecutively admitted to two geriatric services (n = 146) were administered the SF-36 and comparative measures on admission and discharge. Internal consistency (0.75–0.91) and test-retest reliability (0.24–0.80) did not meet standards for clinical application of the tool. Four subscales were moderately correlated with comparative measures (Physical Function 0.53 to −0.76; Bodily Pain −0.61; Vitality −0.58; Mental Health −0.63). The results of effect size, standardized response mean, and relative efficiency statistics were consistent in documenting only minimal change for the SF-36 subscales. The SF-36 appears to be reliable and valid, although its ability to monitor clinical change for frail older patients is questionable.

Introduction

The evaluation of interventions targeted to the frail elderly is challenging, given that their problems are multiple and complex, and that few health outcomes are important for all patients 1, 2, 3. The traditional health outcomes of mortality and morbidity reduction often fail to capture all of the issues that are important for preserving dignity and maintaining independence of this group [3]. Consequently, measures that address these health-related factors are needed when evaluating specialized geriatric interventions 4, 5.

Although a number of instruments are available to tap health-related quality of life (HRQL) in general 6, 7, to address specific health dimensions 8, 9, 10 and to examine HRQL in distinct populations 11, 12, no “gold standard” exists. The generic Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) [13], has, however, gained rapid acceptance as a HRQL measure, because of its brevity and favorable psychometric properties [14]. While there is extensive experience with the SF-36 in general populations across age groups and health conditions 15, 16, 17, there is a paucity of data to support its use with the frail elderly. Many studies incorporate the elderly, but fail to describe its measurement properties for the oldest old (>75 years) 16, 17, 18, 19, in whom frailty is a common occurrence [3]. Studies often exclude persons with multiple health problems or chronic conditions 20, 21, 22, and when older persons are included is often not evident that they are frail 20, 23, 24, 25, 26.

It has been suggested that the SF-36 may be the optimum outcome measure [27], and to have surpassed the Nottingham Health Profile [7], a long-standing generic assessment of HRQL, as the instrument of choice for outcomes research [14]. This project was designed to test these claims by assessing the feasibility, scaling properties, reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the SF-36 in a frail elderly patient population, using standardized instructions for administration and scoring.

Section snippets

Design, Setting, and Subjects

This study was conducted between September 1995 and November 1996, on the Geriatric Restorative Care (GRC) and the Geriatric Day Hospital (GDH) services, at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre (QEII HSC), Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. The GRC and GDH programs provide inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation respectively, to elderly people who require rehabilitation following surgery, acute illness, or chronic health problems. All persons 65 years and older were eligible for inclusion;

Patients

Two hundred patients with first admissions were screened for the study. Eight persons (4.0%) refused to participate, 41 (20.5%) were ineligible, and five (2.5%) could not be contacted in time (four missed, one quarantined). The patients who completed the interview battery differed from those who did not complete the tests. The ineligible/refused group had fewer years of education, were less likely to reside in their own home, were more cognitively impaired, and more limited in IADL prior to

Discussion

This study examined the measurement properties of the SF-36 for frail elderly individuals admitted to an inpatient rehabilitative service and outpatient hospital program. Although the measurement properties of the SF-36 are well documented in general populations 19, 32, 36, 40, this is the first study to evaluate comprehensively the performance of the instrument in a cohort of frail elderly people.

Recruitment of a well defined cohort of frail elderly persons represents an important strength of

Conclusion

This study set out to address two assertions, that the SF-36 represents the “optimum outcome measure” [27] and that the instrument displays superior measurement properties for subsequent application with the frail elderly. In conclusion, the results of this study do not support these broad claims.

Although the SF-36 can be administered to frail elderly in a timely fashion and with limited missing data, a substantial proportion of the responses to items are inconsistent. It is not clear, at this

Acknowledgements

This study was supported with a grant from the Camp Hill Medical Centre Research Fund. The National Health Research Development Program (NHRDP) supported this research through a National Health Scholar award to Kenneth Rockwood and through a National Health graduate award to Karen Stadnyk.

References (48)

  • S.M. Hunt et al.

    Measuring Health Status

    (1986)
  • C.V. Granger et al.

    Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitationMeasurement by PULSES Profile and the Barthel Index

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1979)
  • G.G. Fillenbaum et al.

    The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire

    J Gerontol

    (1981)
  • P.S. Parfrey et al.

    Development of a health questionnaire specific for end-stage renal disease

    Nephron

    (1989)
  • J.E.J. Ware et al.

    The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection

    Med Care

    (1992)
  • I. McDowell et al.

    Measuring HealthA Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires

    (1996)
  • J.E.J. Ware et al.

    SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide

    (1993)
  • C. Jenkinson et al.

    Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaireNormative data for adults of working age

    Br Med J

    (1993)
  • P.S. Kurtin et al.

    Patient-based health status measures in outpatient dialysis

    Med Care

    (1992)
  • D.R. Nerenz et al.

    Ongoing assessment of health status in patients with diabetes mellitus

    Med Care

    (1992)
  • J.E. Brazier et al.

    Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaireNew outcome measure for primary care

    Br Med J

    (1992)
  • M.E. Kantz et al.

    Methods for assessing condition-specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement

    Med Care

    (1992)
  • R.E. Gliklich et al.

    Longitudinal sensitivity of generic and specific health measures in chronic sinusitis

    Qual Life Res

    (1995)
  • D. Reuben et al.

    Measuring physical function in community-dwelling older personsA comparison of self-administered, interview-administered, and performance-based measures

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1995)
  • Cited by (90)

    • Sedentary Time in Older Adults With Acute Cardiovascular Disease

      2022, CJC Open
      Citation Excerpt :

      The SF-36 Health Survey is a 36-item health-related quality of life (HRQOL) survey self-reported by patients. It is the most widely used HRQOL instrument, is feasible to administer in-person and by phone, and has been validated in older patient populations.14 Covariates of interest included age, sex, primary admission diagnosis, length of unit stay and LOF scores at 3 intervals (prehospital, admission, and unit discharge).

    • Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults With Acute Cardiovascular Disease Undergoing Early Mobilization

      2021, CJC Open
      Citation Excerpt :

      Data on patient physical and mental health is stratified across 8 domains: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health.11 The SF-36 is the most widely used HRQOL instrument, is easy to administer in person and by telephone, and has been shown to be valid and reliable in elderly populations.13 For each subject, the following data were obtained from the electronic medical record: age, sex, primary admission diagnosis, length of CICU and hospital stay, discharge location, vital status at discharge, mobility assessments (LOF scores, contraindications, activities completed, and adverse events).

    • Inclusion of frail elderly patients in clinical trials: Solutions to the problems

      2013, Journal of Geriatric Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Studies have shown that frail older adults have difficulty with self-administered questionnaires. For example, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) [12] has proven to be reliable and valid in a frail elderly population only when used in an interview setting [19,20]. The interview setting used made it difficult to strictly adhere to the content of the questionnaires due to the addition of personal comments and questions leading the patients to disclose tangential information.

    • Measuring Outcomes of Multidimensional Interventions

      2010, Brocklehurst's Textbook of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Accepted for publication on 28 April 1998.

    View full text