Original ArticlesTesting the Measurement Properties of the Short Form-36 Health Survey in a Frail Elderly Population☆
Introduction
The evaluation of interventions targeted to the frail elderly is challenging, given that their problems are multiple and complex, and that few health outcomes are important for all patients 1, 2, 3. The traditional health outcomes of mortality and morbidity reduction often fail to capture all of the issues that are important for preserving dignity and maintaining independence of this group [3]. Consequently, measures that address these health-related factors are needed when evaluating specialized geriatric interventions 4, 5.
Although a number of instruments are available to tap health-related quality of life (HRQL) in general 6, 7, to address specific health dimensions 8, 9, 10 and to examine HRQL in distinct populations 11, 12, no “gold standard” exists. The generic Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) [13], has, however, gained rapid acceptance as a HRQL measure, because of its brevity and favorable psychometric properties [14]. While there is extensive experience with the SF-36 in general populations across age groups and health conditions 15, 16, 17, there is a paucity of data to support its use with the frail elderly. Many studies incorporate the elderly, but fail to describe its measurement properties for the oldest old (>75 years) 16, 17, 18, 19, in whom frailty is a common occurrence [3]. Studies often exclude persons with multiple health problems or chronic conditions 20, 21, 22, and when older persons are included is often not evident that they are frail 20, 23, 24, 25, 26.
It has been suggested that the SF-36 may be the optimum outcome measure [27], and to have surpassed the Nottingham Health Profile [7], a long-standing generic assessment of HRQL, as the instrument of choice for outcomes research [14]. This project was designed to test these claims by assessing the feasibility, scaling properties, reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the SF-36 in a frail elderly patient population, using standardized instructions for administration and scoring.
Section snippets
Design, Setting, and Subjects
This study was conducted between September 1995 and November 1996, on the Geriatric Restorative Care (GRC) and the Geriatric Day Hospital (GDH) services, at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre (QEII HSC), Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. The GRC and GDH programs provide inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation respectively, to elderly people who require rehabilitation following surgery, acute illness, or chronic health problems. All persons 65 years and older were eligible for inclusion;
Patients
Two hundred patients with first admissions were screened for the study. Eight persons (4.0%) refused to participate, 41 (20.5%) were ineligible, and five (2.5%) could not be contacted in time (four missed, one quarantined). The patients who completed the interview battery differed from those who did not complete the tests. The ineligible/refused group had fewer years of education, were less likely to reside in their own home, were more cognitively impaired, and more limited in IADL prior to
Discussion
This study examined the measurement properties of the SF-36 for frail elderly individuals admitted to an inpatient rehabilitative service and outpatient hospital program. Although the measurement properties of the SF-36 are well documented in general populations 19, 32, 36, 40, this is the first study to evaluate comprehensively the performance of the instrument in a cohort of frail elderly people.
Recruitment of a well defined cohort of frail elderly persons represents an important strength of
Conclusion
This study set out to address two assertions, that the SF-36 represents the “optimum outcome measure” [27] and that the instrument displays superior measurement properties for subsequent application with the frail elderly. In conclusion, the results of this study do not support these broad claims.
Although the SF-36 can be administered to frail elderly in a timely fashion and with limited missing data, a substantial proportion of the responses to items are inconsistent. It is not clear, at this
Acknowledgements
This study was supported with a grant from the Camp Hill Medical Centre Research Fund. The National Health Research Development Program (NHRDP) supported this research through a National Health Scholar award to Kenneth Rockwood and through a National Health graduate award to Karen Stadnyk.
References (48)
The McGill Pain QuestionnaireMajor properties and scoring methods
Pain
(1975)- et al.
Measuring the quality of life of cancer patientsA concise QL-index for use by physicians
J Chronic Dis
(1981) - et al.
Evaluation of the short-form 36-item questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life in patients with COPD
Chest
(1995) - et al.
“Mini-Mental State”A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician
J Psychiatr Res
(1975) - et al.
Illness presentation in elderly patients
Arch Intern Med
(1995) - et al.
Preventing frail health
Clin Geriatr Med
(1992) - et al.
Frailty in elderly peopleAn evolving concept
Can Med Assoc J
(1994) A multidimensional view of quality of life in frail elders
Measurement of quality of life in the frail elderly
- et al.
The Sickness Impact ProfileDevelopment and final revision of a health status measure
Med Care
(1981)
Measuring Health Status
Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitationMeasurement by PULSES Profile and the Barthel Index
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire
J Gerontol
Development of a health questionnaire specific for end-stage renal disease
Nephron
The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection
Med Care
Measuring HealthA Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires
SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide
Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaireNormative data for adults of working age
Br Med J
Patient-based health status measures in outpatient dialysis
Med Care
Ongoing assessment of health status in patients with diabetes mellitus
Med Care
Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaireNew outcome measure for primary care
Br Med J
Methods for assessing condition-specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement
Med Care
Longitudinal sensitivity of generic and specific health measures in chronic sinusitis
Qual Life Res
Measuring physical function in community-dwelling older personsA comparison of self-administered, interview-administered, and performance-based measures
J Am Geriatr Soc
Cited by (90)
Sedentary Time in Older Adults With Acute Cardiovascular Disease
2022, CJC OpenCitation Excerpt :The SF-36 Health Survey is a 36-item health-related quality of life (HRQOL) survey self-reported by patients. It is the most widely used HRQOL instrument, is feasible to administer in-person and by phone, and has been validated in older patient populations.14 Covariates of interest included age, sex, primary admission diagnosis, length of unit stay and LOF scores at 3 intervals (prehospital, admission, and unit discharge).
Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults With Acute Cardiovascular Disease Undergoing Early Mobilization
2021, CJC OpenCitation Excerpt :Data on patient physical and mental health is stratified across 8 domains: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health.11 The SF-36 is the most widely used HRQOL instrument, is easy to administer in person and by telephone, and has been shown to be valid and reliable in elderly populations.13 For each subject, the following data were obtained from the electronic medical record: age, sex, primary admission diagnosis, length of CICU and hospital stay, discharge location, vital status at discharge, mobility assessments (LOF scores, contraindications, activities completed, and adverse events).
Inclusion of frail elderly patients in clinical trials: Solutions to the problems
2013, Journal of Geriatric OncologyCitation Excerpt :Studies have shown that frail older adults have difficulty with self-administered questionnaires. For example, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) [12] has proven to be reliable and valid in a frail elderly population only when used in an interview setting [19,20]. The interview setting used made it difficult to strictly adhere to the content of the questionnaires due to the addition of personal comments and questions leading the patients to disclose tangential information.
Measuring Outcomes of Multidimensional Interventions
2010, Brocklehurst's Textbook of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology
- ☆
Accepted for publication on 28 April 1998.