Elsevier

Ambulatory Pediatrics

Volume 8, Issue 4, July–August 2008, Pages 266-269
Ambulatory Pediatrics

Brief Report
Development of a Brief Questionnaire to Identify Families in Need of Legal Advocacy to Improve Child Health

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ambp.2008.04.004Get rights and content

Objective

To determine whether the medical-legal advocacy screening questionnaire (MASQ), a simple 10-item questionnaire, is able to screen families in a primary care setting for possible referral to legal services more effectively than the clinical interview alone.

Methods

Family Advocates of Central Massachusetts (FACM) is a medical-legal collaboration that assists low-income families with legal issues that affect child health. A convenience sample of parents seen at each of 5 medical practices associated with FACM was recruited to complete the MASQ prior to a routine child health care visit. Physicians blinded to the result assessed family need for referral to FACM after their usual clinical encounter. The sensitivity and specificity of both the MASQ and provider assessment were calculated.

Results

Two hundred fifty-five parents from 5 practices participated in the study. The MASQ identified 85 patients in need of legal services. Prior to reviewing the MASQ, the primary care providers identified 35 families in need of referral to the FACM. After completion of both the MASQ and the medical encounter, 37 families agreed to referral. The MASQ had sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.75 in predicting program referral. Provider assessment had sensitivity of 0.65 and specificity of 0.95 of predicting program referral.

Conclusions

Routine use of the MASQ would likely identify more patients in pediatric practices who would accept referral to legal assistance than reliance on provider impression alone after a routine clinical encounter.

Section snippets

Questionnaire Development

The survey used questions taken verbatim from a series of clinical practice guideline queries developed for legal advocacy at Boston Medical Center (a copy of the questionnaire is available from the authors).7 The 10 questions covered 4 topic areas: housing (1 question), financial stability (4 questions), dignity and safety (2 questions), and access to services (3 questions). The questionnaire was pretested by 15 parents in waiting rooms of the participating clinical sites and modified, upon

Results

Two hundred fifty-five (95.5%) of 267 parents who were invited to participate in the study completed the MASQ. Seven were excluded due to language concerns or lack of a parent or guardian, and 5 declined to participate. The mean age of the parent completing the survey was 33.7 years. The mean age of the child being seen was 5.7 years. The mean family size was 4.1. Nearly one half (48%) of families reported a total annual family income of less than $30,000 per year. Just over one half (58%) of

Discussion

The MASQ, a 10-item parent-completed survey, identified more families that accepted referral to the medical-legal partnership than were identified by the clinician's judgment, suggesting that formal screening may be helpful in assuring access for legal services. The MASQ was more sensitive and much less specific than the clinician's judgment, resulting in a lower PPV for the MASQ in the population screened. Identifying a legal need may not result in a program referral. Families may not be

Acknowledgments

This work was support by grant HRSA 1 H17MC02515-01-00 (DK) from the Healthy Tomorrows Partnership for Children, Bureau of Maternal and Child Health, Health Resources and Services Administration. We thank the partners of FACM (Legal Assistance Corporation of Central Massachusetts, Pediatric Primary Care Associates, Family Health Center of Worcester, CHC Family Health Center/Fitchburg, Community Pediatrics of Milford, and South County Pediatrics), without whose enthusiastic cooperation this

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (26)

  • Embracing the complexity of modifiable risk reduction: A registry of modifiable risks for 0-12 month infants

    2020, Preventive Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    No additional unique assessments were identified in the PubMed, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and SocINDEX database searches. Overall, 18 assessments meeting the specified criteria were identified: Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs (AHC HSRN) (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2017), American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) Social Needs Screening Tool (Academy of Family Physicians, A, 2018), Bright Futures (American Academy of Pediatrics, n.d.), Health Steps (Fleegler, 2016), Health Leads Social Needs Screening Toolkit (Health Leads, 2016), IHELLP (Kenyon, 2007), IHELP (Colvin, 2016), IOM Social and Behavioral Domains for Electronic Health Records (Institute of Medicine, 2014), iScreen (Laura Gottlieb, 2014), Medical-Legal Advocacy Screening Questionnaire (MASQ) (Keller, 2008), Medical-Legal Partnership (Medical-Legal Partnership Legal Needs Screener, 2016), Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patient Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE) (PRAPARE: Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patient Assets, Risks, and Experiences, 2016), Pediatric Social Risk Instrument (PSRI) (Cohen-Silver, 2018), SEEK (Dubowitz, 2014), Survey of Wellbeing of Young Children (SWYC) (Tufts, 2019), Your Current Life Situation (Permanente, 2016), WE CARE (Garg, 2015), and WEllRx (Page-Reeves, 2016). Each of the identified assessments was reviewed to determine whether the risk registry was missing any risk factors that should be added to the risk factor listing (based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria described under Expert Elaboration above).

  • Unmet legal and social advocacy needs of children with sickle cell disease: Implications for health care payer costs

    2018, Children and Youth Services Review
    Citation Excerpt :

    The independent variables of interest were the presence of one or more legal advocacy needs and the presence of one or more social advocacy needs. These advocacy needs were identified through a screening tool that built off an existing questionnaire developed to detect legal advocacy needs with greater sensitivity than medical providers alone were able to identify (Keller, Jones, Savageau, et al., 2008). The original instrument was modified in several ways for study purposes.

  • An Integrative Review of Social Determinants of Health Assessment and Screening Tools Used in Pediatrics

    2017, Journal of Pediatric Nursing
    Citation Excerpt :

    Similar to validity and reliability, screening tools are often assessed in terms of their sensitivity and specificity to accurately discern families in need of resources from those who are not in need. Therefore, in lieu of validation, Keller, Jones, Savageau, and Cashman (2008) evaluated the quality of their tool's sensitivity and specificity in accurately capturing those in need of services. Methods used to develop an initial tool can include a number of strategies such as literature reviews, sampling of previously created tools, expert consultation and consumer participation.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text