Preventive cardiologyA Coronary Heart Disease Risk Score Based on Patient-Reported Information
Section snippets
Methods
For this study, we used the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) Study public use data. The ARIC is a large-scale prospective cohort that also includes a community surveillance component and is composed of black and nonblack men and women age 45 to 64 years at entry (1987 to 1989) with follow-up to December 31, 1998. Follow-up examinations were conducted in 1990 to 1992, 1993 to 1995, and 1996 to 1998.
The present analysis was limited to persons who did not have previously diagnosed CHD or
Results
Baseline characteristics of men and women in the ARIC cohort are listed in Table 1.Table 2 lists hazard ratios from the reduced-variable model in men and assignment of risk score points based on hazards ratios. In addition, the Personal HEART score for men includes several variables not included in the FRS or European SCORE, specifically family history of CHD and physical activity. In Table 3, hazard ratios from the reduced-variable model in women indicate a core set of variables similar to
Discussion
Many studies have sought to improve CHD risk scoring systems by increasing the number of risk factors assessed, most often requiring clinicians to obtain more laboratory or examination data.13, 23 In contrast, this study sought to develop and validate a risk score using self-report data to provide a simple method of initial risk assessment to be used by clinicians immediately within 1 office visit, and it can be used by patients without requiring immediate access to a clinician to obtain
References (26)
- et al.
Sheffield risk and treatment table for cholesterol lowering for primary prevention of coronary heart disease
Lancet
(1995) - et al.
Black-white differences in subclinical cardiovascular disease among older adults: the Cardiovascular Health StudyCHS Collaborative Research Group
J Clin Epidemiol
(1995) - et al.
Coronary heart disease risk prediction in the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) Study
J Clin Epidemiol
(2003) - et al.
A simple clinical score accurately predicts outcome in a community-based population undergoing stress testing
Am J Med
(2005) Lipids, risk factors and ischemic heart disease
Atherosclerosis
(1996)- et al.
Clinical prediction models: are we building better mousetraps?
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2003) - et al.
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation
J Chronic Dis
(1987) - et al.
Data collection for sexually transmitted disease diagnoses: a comparison of self-report, medical record reviews, and state health department reports
Ann Epidemiol
(2005) Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)
JAMA
(2001)- et al.
Risk scores predict atherosclerotic lesions in young people
Arch Intern Med
(2005)
Updated risk factor values and the ability of the multivariable risk score to predict coronary heart disease
Am J Epidemiol
Management of raised blood pressure in New Zealand: a discussion document
BMJ
An updated coronary risk profile: a statement for health professionals
Circulation
Cited by (55)
Derivation and validation of a set of 10-year cardiovascular risk predictive functions in Spain: The FRESCO Study
2014, Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :The functions presented here are relatively simple, and some of them could be easily self-administered in the absence of laboratory and blood pressure determinations. Previous studies report that similar risk prediction outcomes can be obtained with self-reported risk factors and with functions that do not include laboratory information (Gaziano et al., 2008; Mainous et al., 2007). About 10% of patients were properly reclassified using the more complex function as compared to the simplest approach.
Research status of cardiovascular disease prediction model in diabetic patients
2024, Chinese Journal of Diabetes MellitusEvidence supporting the choice of a new cardiovascular risk equation for Australia
2023, Medical Journal of AustraliaCardiovascular Risk Prediction Models and Scores in the Era of Personalized Medicine
2022, Journal of Personalized MedicineGeneralizability of Cardiovascular Disease Clinical Prediction Models: 158 Independent External Validations of 104 Unique Models
2022, Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
This work was supported in part by Grant No. 1D14 HP 00161 from the Health Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland; Grant No. 1 P30AG021677 from the National Institute on Aging; Grant No. 5P60MD000267 (EXPORT) from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and Grant No. 051896 from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, New Jersey. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study is conducted and supported by The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) in collaboration with the ARIC Study Investigators.
This work was prepared using a limited access dataset obtained by the NHLBI and does not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of the ARIC Study or the NHLBI.