Overconfidence in Clinical Decision Making
Section snippets
Dual processing approach to decision making
Effective problem solving, sound judgment, and well-calibrated clinical decision making are considered to be among the highest attributes of physicians. Surprisingly, however, this important area has been actively researched for only about 35 years. The main epistemological issues in clinical decision making have been reviewed.7 Much current work in cognitive science suggests that the brain utilizes 2 subsystems for thinking, knowing, and information processing: System 1 and System 2.8, 9, 10,
Overconfidence
Overconfident judgment by clinicians is 1 example of many cognitive biases that may influence reasoning and medical decision making. This bias has been well demonstrated in the psychology literature, where it appears as a common, but not universal, finding.29, 30 Ethnic cross-cultural variations in overconfidence have been described.31 Further, we appear to be consistently overconfident when we express extreme confidence.29 Overconfidence also plays a role in self-assessment, where it is
Solutions and conclusions
Overconfidence often occurs when determining a course of action and, accordingly, should be examined in the context of judgment and decision making. It appears to be influenced by a number of factors related to the individual as well as the task, some of which interact with one another. Overconfidence is associated in particular with confirmation bias and may underlie hindsight bias. It seems to be especially dependent on the manner in which the individual gathers evidence to support a belief.
Author disclosures
The authors report the following conflicts of interest with the sponsor of this supplement article or products discussed in this article:
Pat Croskerry, MD, PhD, has no financial arrangement or affiliation with a corporate organization or a manufacturer of a product discussed in this article.
Geoff Norman, PhD, has no financial arrangement or affiliation with a corporate organization or a manufacturer of a product discussed in this article.
References (62)
- et al.
Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine
Am J Med
(2008) - et al.
Interference with bottom-up feature detection by higher-level object recognition
Curr Biol
(2007) - et al.
The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth
Cognit Sci
(2002) - et al.
Attributing causes for one's own performance: the effects of sex, norms, and outcome
J Res Pers
(1977) - et al.
Two methods of reducing overconfidence
Organ Behav Human Decis Process
(1987) - et al.
Evidence-based practice: logic and critical thinking in medicine
(2005) Timely recognition and diagnosis of illness
- et al.
Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study 1
N Eng J Med
(1991) - et al.
The Quality in Australian Health Care Study
Med J Aust
(1995) - et al.
Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado
Med Care
(2000)
The epistemology of clinical reasoning: perspectives from philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience
Acad Med
Actual Minds, Possible Worlds
Intuitive and analytic cognition: information models
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning
Psychol Bull
Rationality and Reasoning
Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?
Behav Brain Sci
The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin
Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences
Am Psychol
The Modularity of Mind
Building on experience—the development of clinical reasoning
New Engl J Med
The non-analytic basis of clinical reasoning
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract
Influence of a single example upon subsequent electrocardiogram interpretation
Teach Learn Med
Concepts and conceptual structure
Am Psychol
Decentralized control of categorization: the role of prior processing episodes
ABC Research GroupSimple Heuristics That Make Us Smart
Heuristics and biases: a biased perspective on clinical reasoning
Med Educ
Coordination of analytic and similarity-based processing strategies and expertise in dermatological diagnosis
Teach Learn Med
Giving learners the best of both worlds: do clinical teachers need to guard against teaching pattern recognition to novices?
Acad Med
The Power of Thinking Without Thinking
On making the right choice: the deliberation-without-attention effect
Science
Informal logical fallacies
Cited by (197)
On the use of positive test strategies when diagnosing mental disorders
2022, Comprehensive PsychiatryImproving the Relationship Between Confidence and Competence: Implications for Diagnostic Radiology Training From the Psychology and Medical Literature
2022, Academic RadiologyCitation Excerpt :That is, overconfidence is the most prominent among those with limited competence and/or experience in a particular domain (4,5) and is exacerbated as tasks become more challenging (6). In this context, calibration is defined as the appropriate matching of competence and confidence (7–15). A mismatch in this respect may then be referred to as miscalibration.
Statement of Author Disclosures: Please see the Author Disclosures section at the end of this article.