Awareness of General Practitioners concerning cancer patients’ preferences for place of death: Evidence from four European countries
Introduction
Cancer is a leading cause of death in Europe with standardised statistics demonstrating more than 169 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants annually died from malignancies.1 Therefore, offering quality cancer care is crucial and palliative care is one element. Achieving patients’ preference is a marker in assessing quality of care1 and place of death deserves attention because it gives patients and their families a sense of control and thus improving the quality of death.2 Meeting patients’ preferences of place of death enhances the quality of cancer care in addition to other goals such as symptom control and spending time with family at the end-of-life.3
Existing literature shows that from 44% to 90% of individuals (both cancer patients and healthy population) worldwide desire to die at home4, 5, 6, 7 while these wishes often remain unfulfilled. Hospital deaths account for 35% to 65% cancer deaths in the United Kingdom (UK) and 45% in the Netherlands.8, 9, 10 Information on how well this preference is met (congruence between actual and preferred place of death) is less known. One Italian survey reports an overall 67% of sampled patients died in their preferred place of death11 whereas the proportion drops to just over 50% in an Irish study.12 A recent study shows an increase of home deaths in Britain, from 18% in 2004 to 21% in 2010, the rise is more pronounced among cancer patients.13 This might be related to the introduction of the End-of-Life Care Strategy in 2008,14 which includes place of death as a quality indicator, demonstrating the potential benefits of integrating palliative care into public health.15
This study uses General Practitioners (GPs) as proxies for information. Though precise statistics on GPs’ coverage are not available, previous studies highlight their role in improving palliative care services.10, 16, 17 Abarshi shows that four-fifths of patients had their preference met when Dutch GPs knew them10 while Meeussen et al. show that only 46% of Belgian GPs knew the preferred place of death of their cancer patients,17 indicating room for improvements.
An international study on preference met with regard to GPs’ involvement in end-of-life care for cancer patients would add to the knowledge on improving GP-patient communications.
The study aims of this article are:
- (1)
To report GPs’ awareness of preferred place of death of a sample of deceased cancer patients in four European countries (Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy and Spain).
- (2)
To estimate the distribution of actual and preferred place of death from a sample of deceased cancer patients in the four countries.
- (3)
To describe preference met in the sampled cancer patients.
Section snippets
The EURO SENTI-MELC study
The European Sentinel Network of the GPs to Monitor End-of-Life Care (EURO SENTI-MELC) is a large scale epidemiological descriptive study conducted in four European countries in 2009–2010 based on continuous full-year registration of all patients who died in the participating GP sentinel networks. The study started in Belgium in 2004 and expanded to the Netherlands in 2005 and has continued since then.
Observational unit
General practices are the observational units. The GP network covers 1.8% and 0.8% of the
Selection of sample (Fig. 1)
A total of 3336 deaths were reported from the four countries with 938 ‘non-sudden’ cancer deaths. Preference met on place of death was analysed for 377 patients whose ‘preferred’ and ‘actual’ place of death were known.
Patient characteristics
There was no difference between cancer patients in terms of age but more male patients were included. (Table 1). One fourth of patients aged between 18 and 64 (except in Italy), 60% of patients aged between 65 and 85; the very old (aged 85 or above) comprised another 15%. Forty
Discussions
This is the first cross-European study to measure preference met on place of death for cancer patients from a general practice population. For actual place of death, home deaths varied from one-third in Belgium to over 60% in the Netherlands. 70–90% of GPs reported home as the preferred location of their cancer patients. The proportion of preference met was high (over 80%), except in Italy. Both results are supported by the existing literature.6, 10, 11, 17
One finding is the large cross-country
Strengths and limitations
This is a European-wide study on preference met on place of death among cancer patients, using GPs as proxies. The same methodology was applied in four countries, allowing comparisons across territories. The choice of countries, Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy and Spain reflects the diversity of healthcare systems and cultures. Furthermore, efforts have been made to achieve the best representativeness possible and GPs reported weekly to minimise recall bias.
Nevertheless there are limitations
Conclusions
It has been repeatedly reported that patients wish to die at home.4, 5, 6, 7 The article describes the current situation and explores conditions related to the preferred place of death in four European countries. Except in the Netherlands, the majority of GPs surveyed were not aware of the preferred place of death of patients and where this was the case, patients usually died in hospitals. Nonetheless, by offering training to GPs on end-of-life care communication, better arrangements can be
Funding
EURO IMPACT, European Intersectorial and Multidisciplinary Palliative Care Research Training, is funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013, under Grant agreement N° [264697]). EURO IMPACT aims to develop a multidisciplinary, multi-professional and inter-sectorial educational and research training framework for palliative care research in Europe. EURO IMPACT is coordinated by Prof Luc Deliens and Prof Lieve Van den Block of the End-of-Life Care Research Group, Ghent
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
References (36)
- et al.
The importance of measuring strength-of-preference scores for health care options in preference-sensitive care
J Clin Epidemiol
(2012) - et al.
Japanese people’s preference for place of end-of-life care and death: a population-based nationwide survey
J Pain Symptom Manage
(2011) - et al.
General practitioner awareness of preferred place of death and correlates of dying in a preferred place: a nationwide mortality follow-back study in the Netherlands
J Pain Symptom Manage
(2009) - et al.
Redes centinela sanitarias en Espana. Consenso para una guia de principios y metodos. [Guide to the principles and methods of health sentinel network in Spain] (article in Spanish)
Gac Sanit
(2006) - et al.
Propensity for home death among Taiwanese cancer decedents, 2001–2006 determined by services received at end of life
J Pain Symptom Manage
(2010) - et al.
Place of death and access to home care services: are certain patient groups at a disadvantage?
Soc Sci Med
(1998) - et al.
Cancer mortality in Europe, 2000–2004, and an overview of trend since 1975
Ann Oncol
(2010) - et al.
End-of-life decision-making in six European countries: descriptive study
Lancet
(2003) - et al.
Place of death and end-of-life care
- et al.
Factor considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers
J Am Med Assoc
(2000)
Preferences for place of death if faced with advanced cancer: a population survey in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain
Ann Oncol
Terminal cancer care and patients’ preference for place of death: a prospective study
BMJ
When death is imminent: where terminally ill patients with cancer prefer to die and why
Cancer Nurs
Home or hospital? Choices at the end of life
J R Soc Med
Place of death in the Morecambe Bay area: patterns and preferences for place of final care and death among terminally ill cancer patients and their carers
Actual and preferred place of death of cancer patients. Results from the Italian survey of the dying of cancer (ISDOC)
J Epidemiol Community Health
A prospective study of preferred versus actual place of death among patients referred to a palliative care home-care service
Ir Med J
Reversal of the British trends in place of death: time series analysis 2004–2010
Palliat Med
Cited by (23)
End-of-Life Place of Care, Health Care Settings, and Health Care Transitions Among Cancer Patients: Impact of an Integrated Cancer Palliative Care Plan
2017, Journal of Pain and Symptom ManagementCitation Excerpt :the amount of care and provision by the family and professional caregivers—another relevant socioeconomical issue; the health care professionals readiness toward involvement in the Oncological Palliative Care plans; to this regard, some studies have already highlighted the importance of the intent of end-of-life care declared by the GP, of his active participation in a multidisciplinary Palliative Care unit, and of his awareness of the place of death preferred by the patient.20,27,28 In conclusion, this study shows that a well-integrated Palliative Care approach can be effective—beginning at low level of intensity of care—to further reduce the percentage of patients who undergo frequent and inopportune changes of their care setting during their last month of life.
The family physician’s perceived role in preventing and guiding hospital admissions at the end of life: A focus group study
2014, Annals of Family MedicineCitation Excerpt :Family physicians are thought to play a pivotal role in providing end-of-life care and in enabling terminally ill patients to die at home or in the nursing home where they reside.15,16 It has been shown that most people would prefer to be cared for and to die in familiar surroundings,17,18 and that these preferences are more likely to be met when the family physician is aware of them.17,19,20 Additionally, a nursing home or home death seems to be more likely when the family physician makes more visits in the last 3 months before death,21–23 and continuity of care at the end of life by the family physician seems to reduce emergency department use and hospital death.24,25
Resource use in the last year of life of prostate cancer patients—A register-based analysis
2023, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic DiseasesNarrative review of home care for palliative patients in general practice
2021, Annals of Palliative Medicine
- i
Van den Block Lieve, Meeussen Koen, Brearley Sarah, Caraceni Augusto, Cohen Joachim, Costantini Massimo, Francke Anneke, Harding Richard, Higginson Irene, Kaasa Stein, Linden Karen, Miccinesi Guido, Onwuteaka-Philipsen Bregje, Pardon Koen, Pasman Roeline, Pautex Sophie, Payne Sheila, Deliens Luc.