Effectiveness of case management among older adults with early symptoms of dementia and their primary informal caregivers: A randomized clinical trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.02.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

It is believed that timely recognition and diagnosis of dementia is a pre-condition for improving care for both older adults with dementia and their informal caregivers. However, diagnosing dementia often occurs late in the disease. This means that a significant number of patients with early symptoms of dementia and their informal caregivers may lack appropriate care.

Objectives

To compare the effects of case management and usual care among community-dwelling older adults with early symptoms of dementia and their primary informal caregivers.

Design

Randomized controlled trial with measurements at baseline and after 6 and 12 months.

Setting

Primary care in West-Friesland, the Netherlands.

Participants

99 pairs of community-dwelling older adults with dementia symptoms (defined as abnormal screening for symptoms of dementia) and their primary informal caregivers.

Intervention

12 months of case management by district nurses for both older adults and informal caregivers versus usual care.

Measurements

Primary outcome: informal caregiver's sense of competence. Secondary outcomes: caregiver's quality of life, depressive symptoms, and burden, and patient's quality of life. Process measurements: intervention fidelity and caregiver's satisfaction with the quality of case management.

Results

Linear mixed model analyses showed no statistically significant and clinically relevant differences over time between the two groups. The process evaluation revealed that intervention fidelity could have been better. Meanwhile, informal caregivers were satisfied with the quality of case management.

Conclusion

This study shows no benefits of case management for older adults with dementia symptoms and their primary informal caregivers. One possible explanation is that case management, which has been recommended among diagnosed dementia patients, may not be beneficial if offered too early. However, on the other hand, it is possible that: (1) case management will be effective in this group if more fully implemented and adapted or aimed at informal caregivers who experience more severe distress and problems; (2) case management is beneficial but that it is not seen in the timeframe studied; (3) case management might have undetected small benefits. This has to be established.

Trial registration ISCRTN83135728.

Section snippets

Background

The growing number of older adults with dementia and its associated increasing health care utilization are experienced as problems worldwide, as well as the prevalent adverse financial, physical, social, and psychological consequences for the informal caregivers (Torti et al., 2004).

It is believed that timely recognition and diagnosis of dementia is a pre-condition for improving care for both older adults with dementia and their caregivers (Vernooij-Dassen et al., 2005). However, diagnosing

Design

A randomized controlled trial was conducted with random assignment of participants to either case management by district nurses or usual care. Potential participants were sent an information letter by mail and were asked to sign an informed consent form. In case people were incompetent their representatives were asked to give informed consent. The Medical Ethics Committee of the VU University medical center in Amsterdam approved the study protocol. The study protocol has been described

Participants

Between February 2004 and June 2005, 99 pairs of informal caregivers and care recipients were enrolled in the study in three ways:

  • (1)

    72 care recipients, aged 75 years or older, were identified by means of the IQCODE sent by their PCP and subsequent cognitive testing;

  • (2)

    7 care recipients, aged 75 years or older, were suspected of dementia by their PCP and identified by subsequent cognitive testing. They had not responded to the IQCODE or they had responded but were not identified by means of the

Discussion

This study shows no benefits of case management for older adults with dementia symptoms and their primary caregivers.

Acknowledgements

The authors like to thank all participating older adults and their informal caregivers, the nurses, the PCPs, the interviewers, the research-assistants Willemijn Tybout, Evelyn Mulder and Paulien Hoekstra, and Home Care Organization ‘De Omring’ for their cooperation.

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) kindly supported this study (ZonMw Grant No. 2200.0114). We proposed the study to ZonMw, and after that, the

References (37)

  • D.L. Cherry et al.

    Interventions to improve quality of care: the Kaiser Permanente-Alzheimer's Association Dementia Care Project

    Am. J. Manag. Care

    (2004)
  • G.M. Fitzmaurice et al.

    Applied Longitudinal Analysis

    (2004)
  • A.P. Jansen et al.

    (Cost)-effectiveness of case-management by district nurses among primary informal caregivers of older adults with dementia symptoms and the older adults who receive informal care: design of a randomized controlled trial [ISCRTN83135728]

    BMC Public Health

    (2005)
  • A.F. Jorm et al.

    The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): socio-demographic correlates, reliability, validity and some norms

    Psychol. Med.

    (1989)
  • D.I. Kaufer et al.

    Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory

    J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • KITTZ

    Capacity and burden questionnaire for primary caregivers

    (1997)
  • F. Landi et al.

    Minimum data set for home care: a valid instrument to assess frail older people living in the community

    Med. Care

    (2000)
  • C.A. McHorney et al.

    The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs

    Med. Care

    (1993)
  • Cited by (64)

    • Dyadic interventions in older people with chronic diseases: An integrative review

      2022, Geriatric Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      The caregivers of these older patients were family members, spouses, or significant others. Patients and caregivers in 10 studies participated in the intervention simultaneously in pairs, facilitated by the same interventionist.19-28 In a few studies, patients and caregivers were enrolled as a pair but completed the intervention separately with different interventionists.29-32

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text