ReviewExplaining persistent under-use of colonoscopic cancer screening in African Americans: A systematic review
Introduction
African Americans have a higher incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) than any other ethnic group in the United States (U.S) (Howlader et al., 2012). Despite compelling evidence that CRC screening results in early cancer diagnosis and decreased CRC-related mortality in African Americans, African Americans are less likely to undergo appropriate CRC screening than Whites (Pigone et al., 2002, Zauber et al., 2010, Agrawal et al., 2005, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2012). In recent national estimates, 55% of African Americans, compared to 60% of White Americans were compliant with CRC screening (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2012). Prompted by these disparities, as well as by data supporting a high prevalence of right-sided colonic lesions among African Americans, the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) began recommending in 2009 that CRC screening begin at age 45 for African Americans, with colonoscopy as the preferred screening method (Agrawal et al., 2005, Cress et al., 2000, Nelson et al., 1999, Rex et al., 2009).
In a 2002 report on racial and ethnic inequities in healthcare, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) conceptualizes racial and ethnic disparities in health as the result of factors in patient-, provider-, and healthcare system-level domains (Smedley et al., 2003). While prior studies have identified patient-, provider-, and system-level barriers to several screening methods (fecal occult blood testing [FOBT], sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy) in African Americans, the literature lacks a systematic and summative presentation of the barriers to screening in this ethnic subgroup (Ward et al., 2010 Apr, O’Malley et al., 2005, Dimou et al., 2009, McLachlan et al., 2012). Further, although recent society guidelines emphasize colonoscopy as the preferred screening tool in African Americans, the barriers preventing African Americans from participating in this method of screening are not fully characterized. Given these gaps in the literature, we aimed to provide a systematic review of the literature pertaining to barriers to colonoscopic screening in African Americans. We use the three domains proposed by the IOM to develop a conceptual model that synthesizes the barriers to colonoscopic screening. The resulting conceptual framework provides clinicians, researchers, and healthcare organizations with potential strategies in the design of effective, system-wide interventions to increase the use of colonoscopic screening among African Americans and to reduce disparities in CRC outcomes.
Section snippets
Methods
We conducted a search of the MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases with the guidance of an experienced biomedical librarian (L.F.). Keywords and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms combined the concepts of “colorectal cancer,” “colonic polyps,” “colonoscopy,” “preventive health services,” “barriers to health care,” “health care disparities,” “African Americans,” and “minority groups” (Fig. 1). We restricted our search to English language articles
Results
We identified 468 abstracts in our initial query. Of these, we selected 162 for full-text review and ultimately included 19 publications in the final manuscript (Fig. 2). We were unable to locate the full text of one article through the access of two university libraries (Paskett et al., 1997). Table 1, Table 2 summarize the subject population, study design, and findings of the included studies. The majority of studies included low-income subjects from Community Health Centers or primary care
Discussion
Disparities exist across the cancer control continuum in the US. Given its impact as the third most common malignancy in the US and the potential for its prevention, the American Cancer Society has identified increasing CRC screening as a priority for cancer prevention and control (American Cancer Society, 2013). Despite United States Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations that all Americans aged 50–75 undergo screening for CRC and more recent recommendations by the ACG to
Guarantor of the article
Folasade Popoola May, MD MPhil
Specific author contributions
Erica Bromley: study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, conceptual model, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision of the manuscript.
Folasade P. May: study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, conceptual model, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision of the manuscript. Second revision of manuscript.
Lisa Federer: construction and search of MEDLINE and Cochrane databases.
Brennan Spiegel: study
Financial support
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests.
References (52)
- et al.
Cancer of the colon and rectum in California: trends in incidence by race/ethnicity, stage, and subsite
Prev. Med.
(2000) - et al.
Direct observation and patient recall of health behavior advice
Prev. Med.
(2004) - et al.
Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: a population-based study
Prev. Med.
(2003) - et al.
Barriers and facilitators to digital rectal examination screening among African-American and African-Caribbean men
Urology
(2011) - et al.
Patients' experiences and reported barriers to colonoscopy in the screening context—A systematic review of the literature
Patient Educ. Couns.
(2012) - et al.
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Lancet
(2007) - et al.
Resident physicians' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer screening for African Americans
J. Natl. Med. Assoc.
(2010) - et al.
Colorectal cancer in African-Americans
Am. J. Gastroenterol.
(2005) Cancer Facts & Figures for African Americans 2013–2014
(2013)- et al.
Perceptions of colorectal cancer screening in urban African American clinic patients: differences by gender and screening status
J. Cancer Educ.
(2011)