Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 71, February 2015, Pages 40-48
Preventive Medicine

Review
Explaining persistent under-use of colonoscopic cancer screening in African Americans: A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.11.022Get rights and content

Highlights

  • African Americans are at high risk of mortality from CRC but have low screening rates.

  • Current literature does not contain a systematic review or conceptual framework synthesizing barriers to colonoscopic screening.

  • Patient-level barriers to colonoscopic screening include fear, lack of knowledge about CRC screening, and competing personal and medical issues.

  • Provider-level factors include knowledge deficits of guidelines and barriers, and counseling practices.

  • System-level factors include access to care, financial barriers, and infrequent primary care visits.

Abstract

Introduction

Although African Americans have the highest incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC), they are less likely than other racial groups to undergo CRC screening. Previous research has identified barriers to CRC screening among African Americans. However we lack a systematic review that synthesizes contributing factors and informs interventions to address persistent disparities.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review to evaluate barriers to colonoscopic CRC screening in African Americans. We developed a conceptual model to summarize the patient-, provider-, and system-level barriers and suggest strategies to address these barriers.

Results

Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria. Patient barriers to colonoscopy included fear, poor knowledge of CRC risk, and low perceived benefit of colonoscopy. Provider-level factors included failure to recommend screening and knowledge deficits about guidelines and barriers to screening. System barriers included financial obstacles, lack of insurance and access to care, and intermittent primary care visits.

Conclusions

There are modifiable barriers to colonoscopic CRC screening among African Americans. Future interventions should confront patient fear, patient and physician knowledge about barriers, and access to healthcare services. As the Affordable Care Act aims to improve uptake of preventive services, focused interventions to increase CRC screening in African Americans are essential and timely.

Introduction

African Americans have a higher incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) than any other ethnic group in the United States (U.S) (Howlader et al., 2012). Despite compelling evidence that CRC screening results in early cancer diagnosis and decreased CRC-related mortality in African Americans, African Americans are less likely to undergo appropriate CRC screening than Whites (Pigone et al., 2002, Zauber et al., 2010, Agrawal et al., 2005, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2012). In recent national estimates, 55% of African Americans, compared to 60% of White Americans were compliant with CRC screening (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2012). Prompted by these disparities, as well as by data supporting a high prevalence of right-sided colonic lesions among African Americans, the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) began recommending in 2009 that CRC screening begin at age 45 for African Americans, with colonoscopy as the preferred screening method (Agrawal et al., 2005, Cress et al., 2000, Nelson et al., 1999, Rex et al., 2009).

In a 2002 report on racial and ethnic inequities in healthcare, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) conceptualizes racial and ethnic disparities in health as the result of factors in patient-, provider-, and healthcare system-level domains (Smedley et al., 2003). While prior studies have identified patient-, provider-, and system-level barriers to several screening methods (fecal occult blood testing [FOBT], sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy) in African Americans, the literature lacks a systematic and summative presentation of the barriers to screening in this ethnic subgroup (Ward et al., 2010 Apr, O’Malley et al., 2005, Dimou et al., 2009, McLachlan et al., 2012). Further, although recent society guidelines emphasize colonoscopy as the preferred screening tool in African Americans, the barriers preventing African Americans from participating in this method of screening are not fully characterized. Given these gaps in the literature, we aimed to provide a systematic review of the literature pertaining to barriers to colonoscopic screening in African Americans. We use the three domains proposed by the IOM to develop a conceptual model that synthesizes the barriers to colonoscopic screening. The resulting conceptual framework provides clinicians, researchers, and healthcare organizations with potential strategies in the design of effective, system-wide interventions to increase the use of colonoscopic screening among African Americans and to reduce disparities in CRC outcomes.

Section snippets

Methods

We conducted a search of the MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases with the guidance of an experienced biomedical librarian (L.F.). Keywords and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms combined the concepts of “colorectal cancer,” “colonic polyps,” “colonoscopy,” “preventive health services,” “barriers to health care,” “health care disparities,” “African Americans,” and “minority groups” (Fig. 1). We restricted our search to English language articles

Results

We identified 468 abstracts in our initial query. Of these, we selected 162 for full-text review and ultimately included 19 publications in the final manuscript (Fig. 2). We were unable to locate the full text of one article through the access of two university libraries (Paskett et al., 1997). Table 1, Table 2 summarize the subject population, study design, and findings of the included studies. The majority of studies included low-income subjects from Community Health Centers or primary care

Discussion

Disparities exist across the cancer control continuum in the US. Given its impact as the third most common malignancy in the US and the potential for its prevention, the American Cancer Society has identified increasing CRC screening as a priority for cancer prevention and control (American Cancer Society, 2013). Despite United States Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations that all Americans aged 50–75 undergo screening for CRC and more recent recommendations by the ACG to

Guarantor of the article

Folasade Popoola May, MD MPhil

Specific author contributions

Erica Bromley: study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, conceptual model, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision of the manuscript.

Folasade P. May: study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, conceptual model, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision of the manuscript. Second revision of manuscript.

Lisa Federer: construction and search of MEDLINE and Cochrane databases.

Brennan Spiegel: study

Financial support

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests.

References (52)

  • C. Beeker et al.

    Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for intervention

    J. Community Health

    (2000)
  • J. Benarroch-Gampel et al.

    Colonoscopist and primary care physician supply and disparities in colorectal cancer screening

    Health Serv. Res.

    (2012)
  • J.R. Bloom et al.

    Family history, perceived risk, and prostate cancer screening among African American Men

    Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.

    (2006)
  • M.D. Cabana et al.

    Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement

    JAMA

    (1999)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

    Cancer screening United States 2010

    MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep.

    (2012)
  • N.S. Consedine

    Fear, knowledge, and efficacy beliefs differentially predict the frequency of DRE versus PSA screening in ethnically diverse sample of older men

    Am J Mens Health

    (2007)
  • N.S. Consedine et al.

    The many faeces of colorectal cancer screening embarrassment: preliminary psychometric development and links to screening outcome

    Br. J. Health Psychol.

    (2011)
  • L.A. Curry et al.

    Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research

    Circulation

    (2009)
  • A. Dimou et al.

    Disparities in colorectal cancer in African-Amerians vs Whites: before and after diagnosis

    World J. Gastroenterol.

    (2009)
  • H.R. 3590 111th Congress

    Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act §2713

    (2009)
  • C.L. Holt et al.

    Use of focus group data to develop recommendations for demographically segmented colorectal cancer educational strategies

    Health Educ. Res.

    (2009)
  • J.M. Inadomi et al.

    Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies

    Arch. Intern. Med.

    (2012)
  • A.S. James et al.

    Perceived barriers and benefits to colon cancer screening among African Americans in North Carolina: how does perception relate to screening behavior

    Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.

    (2002)
  • A.S. James et al.

    Knowledge and attitudes about colon cancer screening among African Americans

    Am. J. Health Behav.

    (2011)
  • R.M. Jones et al.

    Is discussion of colorectal cancer screening options associated with heightened patient confusion?

    Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Co-first authors.

    2

    Co-last authors.

    View full text