Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis of “dignity”

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The word “dignity” is frequently used both in clinical and philosophical discourse when referring to and describing the ideal conditions of the patient's treatment, particularly the dying patient. An exploration of the variety of meanings associated with the word dignity will note dignity's ambiguous usage and reveal instrumental concepts needed to better understand the discourse of the dying. When applied to a critique of recent and contemporary criticisms of the medical community's handling of the dying, such concepts might provide a more coherent notion of dignity. Rather than a separate construct, a death with dignity might be viewed as an interactive process among the dying and their caretakers. Together, this interdependent amalgam engages in humanizing communication aimed toward understanding the final needs and wants of the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Code of Medical Ethics. Current Opinions with Annotations. 1996–1997 Edition. Chicago: American Medical Association, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kass LR. Averting one's eyes, or facing the music? — on dignity and death. In: Steinfels P, Veatch RM, eds. Death Inside Out: The Hastings Center Report. New York: Harper & Row, 1974: 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gaylin W. In Defense of the Dignity of Being Human. Hastings Center Rep 1984; 14(4): 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kübler-Ross E. Questions and Answers on Death and Dying. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid: 80.

  6. Caswell D, Omery A. The Dying Patient in the Critical Care Setting: Making the Critical Difference. AACN Clinical Issues for Critical Care Nursing 1990; (May): 179–186.

  7. Geyman JP. Problems in Family Practice, Dying and Death of a Family Member. J Fam Pract 1983; 17: 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quill TE. Death and Dignity, A Case of Individualized Decision Making. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 691–694.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McCormick RA. The Quality of Life, The Sanctity of Life. Hastings Center Rep 1978; 8(Feb): 30–36.

  10. Ibid: 34.

  11. Turner K, Chye R, Aggarwal G, Philip J, et al. Dignity in Dying: A Preliminary Study of Patients in the Last Three Days of Life. J Palliat Care 1996; 12(2): 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sheldon M. Kübler-Ross: An Unresolved Ethical Issue. Linacre Quarterly 1981; 48: 340–345.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid: 344.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid: 345.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Küng H. Eternal Life? New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ariès P. Western Attitudes Toward Death. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ariès P. The Hour of Our Death. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson M. Communicating with the dying. J Med Ethics 1975; 1(Apr): 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Campbell CS. 'Aid-in-dying' and the taking of human life. J Med Ethics 1992; 18(3): 128–134.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Latimer E. Caring for seriously ill and dying patients: the philosophy and ethics. Can Med Assoc J 1991; 144(7): 859–864.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wanzer SH, Federman DD, Adelstein SJ, et al. The Physician's Responsibility Toward Hopelessly Ill Patients. N Engl J Med 1989; 320(13): 844–849.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. Decisions near the end of life. JAMA 1992; 267(16): 2229–2233.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schneiderman LJ, Kaplan RM, Pearlman RA, Teetzel H. Do Physicians' Own Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatment Influence Their Perceptions of Patients' Preferences? J Clin Ethics 1993; 4(1): 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Payne SA, Langley-Evans A, Hillier R. Perceptions of a “good” death: a comparative study of the views of hospice staff and patients. Palliat Med 1996; 10: 307–312.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Virmani J, Schneiderman LJ, Kaplan RM. Relationship of Advance Directives to Physician-Patient Communication. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 909–913.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bronstein JM, Jones CA. Ethics, Technology, and the High Cost of Dying: A Public Forum. South Med J 1986; 79: 1485–1488.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid: 1488.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Quill TE, Brody H. Physician Recommendations and Patient Autonomy: Finding a Balance between Physician Power and Patient Choice. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125(9): 763–769.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Quill TE, Cassel CK. Nonabandonment: A Central Obligation for Physicians. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122(5): 368–374.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wilson: 21.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Carlson JP, Murray CL, Martinson P. The hospice concept, comfort care for dying patients. Postgrad Med 1985; 77(Feb): 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Palmer IO. Discussing death. Nursing Times 1976; (Feb 19): 261.

  33. Groman L. Death with dignity. Nursing 1992; 22(6): 68.

    Google Scholar 

  34. LaMear-Tucker D, Friedson J. Resolving Moral Conflict: The Critical Care Nurse's Role. Crit Care Nurse 1997; 17(2): 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  35. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment: a report on the ethical, medical and legal issues in treatment decisions. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, P.R. An analysis of “dignity”. Theor Med Bioeth 19, 337–352 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009951813110

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009951813110

Navigation