Skip to main content
Log in

Developing an Appropriate EPR System for the Greek Primary Care Setting

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The creation of an electronic patient record (EPR) system with a user-friendly interface based on the concept of the episode of care was considered an urgent priority in the present Greek context, where a Health Care Reform program is in progress. This paper reports the procedures of developing an EPR system, and outlines some of its essentials and key issues. We performed a systematic review and analyzed the perceptions and patterns of use of existing EPR systems among Greek general practitioners. On the basis of this analysis, Transhis was selected using defined criteria for appropriateness, efficiency, and feasibility for general practice as a prototype, for creating a Windows-based EPR system using the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) as classifications. The new EPR system seems appropriate for use within the current Greek primary care setting. Further studies are required for its evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Lionis, C., and Trell, E., Health needs assessment in general practice: The Cretan approach. Eur. J. Gen. Pract. 5:75–77, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Knottnerus, J. A., Role of the electronic patient record in the development of general practice in The Netherlands. Methods Inf. Med. 38:350–354, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lamberts, H., and Hofmans-Okkes, I., The generic patient record: An alliance between patient documentation and Medical Informatics. Methods Inf. Med. 35:5–7, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jerant, A. F., and Hill, D. B., Does the use of electronic medical records improve surrogate patient outcomes in outpatient settings? J. Fam. Pract. 49:349–357, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gill, J. M., and Ewen, E., Impact of an electronic medical record on quality of care in a primary care office. Nsereko Del. Med. J. 73:187–194, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Makoul, G., Curry, R. H., and Tang, P. C., The use of electronic medical records: Communication patterns in outpatient encounters. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 8:610–615, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Van Wijk, M. A., Van der Lei, J., Mosseveld, M., Bohnen, A. M., and van Bemmel, J. H., Assessment of decision support for blood test ordering in primary care. A randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 134:274–281, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McDonald, T., A procedure for evaluating Primary Health Care Software. Curationis 22:16–21, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Okkes, I. M., Oskam, S. K., and Lamberts, H., Van Klacht naar Diagnose. Episodegegevens uit de huisartspraktijk [From Complaint to Diagnosis. Episode data from General Practice, in Dutch]. Bussum: Coutinho 1998. With a CD-ROM.

  10. Okkes, I. M., Oskam, S. K., and Lamberts, H., The probability of specific diagnoses for patients with common symptoms to Dutch family physicians. J. Fam. Pract. 51:31–36, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Okkes, I. M., Groen, A., Oskam, S. K., and Lamberts, H., Advantages of long observation in episode-oriented electronic patient records in family practice. Methods Inf. Med. 40:229–235, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Isacsson, A., Koutis, A., Cedervall, M., Lindholm, L., Lionis, C., Svenninger, K., and Fioretos, M., Patient-number-based computerized medical records in Crete. A tool for planning and assessment of primary health care. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 37:41–49, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. http://softlab.icsd.aegean.gr; dspin/pubs/jrnl/1999-MedInf-Euromed/html/euromed.html

  14. Health.one (http://www.mednet.gr/greek/depts/plomari/EHCR_Top_English.htm).

  15. Antonakis, N., and Lionis, C., Development of an electronic database in Health Center of Anogia in Rethymno. Iatriki 74:320–328, 1998. (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  16. http://www.hygeianet.gr/Application_Domains/PHCCIS/phccis.html

  17. Apollo software (http://www.apollo.gr/dev/projects/Diagonet.asp).

  18. Hannan, T. J., Rotich, J. K., Odero, W. W., Menya, D., Esamai, F., Einterz, R. M., Sidle, J., Smith, F., and Tierney, W. M., The Mosoriot medical record system: Design and initial implementation of an outpatient electronic record system in rural Kenya. Int. J. Med. Inf. 60:21–28, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dupuits, F. M., Hasman, A., and Pop, P., Computer-based assistance in family medicine. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 55:39–50, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Labreze, L., Lagouarde, P., Dakin, C., and Renaud-Salis, J. L., A web interface for multimedia electronic patient record: Consensual validation of the Aquitaine Health Information Network prototypes. Med. Inform. (Lond.) 23:75–84, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chin, H. L., and Krall, M., Implementation of a comprehensive computer-based patient record system in Kaiser Permanente's Northwest Region. MD Comput. 14:41–45, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Frassine, R., and Bertelli, S., The definition of a general practice medical workstation: The ISAAC approach. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 45:101–103, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hasvold, T. A., computerized medical record. "The Balsfjord system." Scand. J. Prim. Health Care 2:125–128, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Okkes, I. M., Polderman, G. O., Fryer, G. E., Yamada, T., Bujak, M., Oskam, S. K., Green, L. A., and Lamberts, H., The role of family practice in different health care systems. A comparison of reasons for encounter, diagnoses, and interventions in primary care populations in the Netherlands, Japan, Poland and the United States. J. Fam. Pract. 51:72, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  25. World Health Organization, Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death, 9th Revision, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Classification Committee of WONCA, ICHPPC-2 Defined. Inclusion Criteria for the Use of Rubrics of the International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lovis, C., Baud, R. H., and Planche, P., Power of expression in the electronic patient record: Structured data or narrative text? Int. J. Med. Inf. 58–59:101–110, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. De Wet, L., McDonald, T., and Pistorius, G., The electronic patient record in general practice—a South-African perspective. Medinfo 1:9–13, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lamberts, H., and Hofmans-Okkes, I., The core of computer based patient records in family practice: Episodes of care classified with ICPC. Int. J. Biomed. Comput. 42:35–41, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  30. van der Horst, F., Metsenakers, J., Vissers, F., Saenger, G., and de Geus, C., The Reason-For-Encounter mode of the ICPC: Reliable, adequate and feasible. Scand. J. Prim. Health Care 7:99–103, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wood, M., Lamberts, H., Meijer, J. S., and Hofmans-Okkes, I. M., The conversion between ICPC and ICD-10. Requirements for a family of classification systems in the next decade. Fam. Pract. 9:340–348, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hofmans-Okkes, I., and Lamberts, H., The International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC): New applications in research and computer based patient records in family practice. Fam. Pract. 13:294–302, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kounalakis, D.K., Lionis, C., Okkes, I. et al. Developing an Appropriate EPR System for the Greek Primary Care Setting. Journal of Medical Systems 27, 239–246 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022571211109

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022571211109

Navigation