Abstract
Social psychologists have addressed stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination for nearly a century. Everyday prejudices first seemed to lodge in abnormal personalities, pathological bigots who were exceptional (“bad apples”), but Freudian explanations proved inadequate. Purely cognitive explanations took their place, arguing that bias inevitably results from normal processes of categorization and association, often automatic. But this so-called cognitive miser account denies the role of intent, which does influence the activation and use of stereotypes and prejudices. People are more realistically “motivated tacticians” who display more cognitive bias under particular social motivations. The author's continuum of impression formation, proceeding from initial categorization to possible moderation by motives, illustrates this view. Plausible social motives include belonging, understanding, controlling, self-enhancing, and trusting, all known to influence ordinary bias. Social neuroscience is beginning to show that motivation and cognition mix at the earliest stages of ordinary bias.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality, Harper, New York.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., and Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71: 230-244.
Blair, I. V., and Banaji, M. R. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70: 1142-1163.
Bobo, L. D. (2000). Race and beliefs about affirmative action. In Sears, D. O., Sidanius, J., and Bobo, L. (eds.), Racialized Politics: The Debate About Racism in America, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 137-164.
Bobo, L. D. (2001). Racial attitudes and relations at the close of the twentieth century. In N. J. Smelser, W. J. Wilson, and F. Mitchell (eds.), American Becoming, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 264-301.
Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull and R. S. Wyer, Jr. (eds). Advances in social cognition: A dual process model of impression formation, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, vol. 1, pp. 1-36.
Brewer, M. B. (2000). Reducing prejudice through cross-categorization: Effects of multiple social identities. In S. Oskamp (ed.), Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 165-184.
Chaiken, S., and Trope, Y. (eds.). (1999) Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, Guilford, New York.
Dasgupta, N. (2004). Implicit ingroup favoritism, outgroup favoritism, and their behavioral manifestations. Soc. Justice Res. 17(2): 143-168.
Fiske, S. T. (2003). Five core social motives, plus or minus five. In S. J. Spencer, S. Fein, M. P. Zanna, and J. Olson (eds.), Motivated social perception: The Ontario Symposium, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, vol. 9, pp. 233-246.
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56: 5-18.
Devine, P. G. (2001). Implicit prejudice and stereotyping: How automatic are they? Introduction to the special section. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81: 757-759.
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., and Gaertner, S. L. (2000). Reducing contemporary prejudice: Combating explicit and implicit bias at the individual and intergroup level. In S. Oskamp (ed.), Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 137-164.
Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive–motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 33, Academic Press, New York, pp. 41-113.
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., and Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69: 1013-1027.
Fein, S., and Spencer, S. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73: 31-44.
Fiske, S. T. (1989). Examining the role of intent: Toward understanding its role in stereotyping and prejudice. In J. S. Uleman and J. A. Bargh (eds.), Unintended Thought, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 253-283.
Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th edn., Vol. 2, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 357-411.
Fiske, S. T. (2000). Interdependence and the reduction of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (ed.), Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 115-135.
Fiske, S. T. (2003). Five core social motives, plus or minus five. In S. J. Spencer, S. Fein, M. P. Zanna, and J. Olson (eds.), Motivated social perception: The Ontario Symposium, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, vol. 9, pp. 233-246.
Fiske, S. T. (2004). Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psychology, Wiley, New York.
Fiske, S. T., Lin, M. H., and Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The Continuum Model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken and Y. Trope (eds.), Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, Guilford, New York, pp. 231-254.
Fiske, S. T., and Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 23, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1-74.
Fiske, S. T., and Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Gaertner, S. L., and Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio and S. L. Gaertner (eds.), Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, Academic Press, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 61-88.
Gilbert, D. T., and Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 60: 509-517.
Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol. Rev. 102: 4-27.
Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., and Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychol. Rev. 109: 3-25.
Hamilton, D. L. (1979). A cognitive–attributional analysis of stereotyping. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 12. Academic Press, New York, pp. 53-84.
Hart, A. J., Whalen, P. J., Shin, L. M., McInerney, S. C., Fischer, H., and Rauch, S. L. (2000). Differential response in the human amygdala to racial outgroup vs ingroup face stimuli. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 11: 2351-2355.
Jones, E. E., Farina, A., Hastorf, A. H., Markus, H., Miller, D. T., and Scott, R. A. (1984). Social Stigma: The Psychology of Marked Relationships, Freeman, New York.
Kinder, D. R., and Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 40: 414-431.
Lepore, L., and Brown, R. (1997). Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable?, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72: 275-287.
Moore, D. A., and Loewenstein, G. (2004). Self-interest, automaticity, and the psychology of conflict of interest. Soc. Justice Res. 17(2): 187-201.
Moskowitz, G. B., Gollwitzer, P. M., Wasel, W., and Schaal, B. (1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77: 167-184.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. In J. T. Spence, J. M. Darley, and D. J. Foss (eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 49, Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 65-85.
Phelps, E. A., O'Connor, K. J., Cunningham, W. A., Funayama, E. S., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., and Banaji, M. R. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12: 729-738.
Rudman, L. A. (2004). Social justice in our minds, homes, and society: The nature, causes, and consequences of implicit bias. Soc. Justice Res. 17(2): 129-142.
Sidanius, J., and Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Stevens, L. E., and Fiske, S. T. (1995). Motivation and cognition in social life: A social survival perspective. Social Cognition, 13: 189-214.
Taylor, S. E. (1981). A categorization approach to stereotyping. In D. L. Hamilton (ed.), Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 88-114.
Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T., Etcoff, N. L., and Ruderman, A. J. (1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 36: 778-793.
Wheeler, M. E., and Fiske, S. T. (2001). fMRI study of three cognitive tasks that differentially modulate stereotype accessibility and human amygdala response to racial outgroup faces. Poster presented at Society for Neuroscience meetings, San Diego, CA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fiske, S.T. Intent and Ordinary Bias: Unintended Thought and Social Motivation Create Casual Prejudice. Social Justice Research 17, 117–127 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SORE.0000027405.94966.23
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SORE.0000027405.94966.23