Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Clinical
  • Published:

Estimates of the likely prophylactic effect of tamoxifen in women with high risk BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations

Abstract

The development of breast cancer control strategies in women at high genetic risk of breast cancer is an important issue. The likely benefit of chemopreventive approaches is of particular interest. Tamoxifen tends to be more effective in both prevention and treatment of oestrogen receptor positive tumours than oestrogen receptor negative. In this study, we combine the oestrogen-receptor specific effects of tamoxifen from randomized preventive or therapeutic trials with the oestrogen receptor status of tumours in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation positive women from published tumour surveys to obtain estimates of the likely effect of tamoxifen administration in mutation carriers. We used a simple two-stage procedure to estimate the benefit as a weighted average of the effect on oestrogen receptor positive tumours and oestrogen receptor negative, and using a more complex hierarchical modelling approach. Using the simple procedure and deriving the estimates of benefit from both primary prevention and therapeutic trials, we obtain an estimated reduction in risk of breast cancer from administration of tamoxifen in BRCA1 mutation positive women of 13% (RR=0.87, 95% CI 0.68–1.11). The corresponding estimated reduction in BRCA2 mutation positive women was 27% (RR=0.73, 95% CI 0.59–0.90). Using the more complex models gave essentially the same results. Using only the primary prevention trials gave smaller estimates of benefit in BRCA1 carriers but larger estimates in BRCA2, in both cases with wider confidence intervals. The benefit of prophylactic use of tamoxifen in BRCA1 mutation carriers is likely to be modest, and the effect in BRCA2 mutation carriers somewhat greater.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  • Agnarsson BA, Jonasson JG, Björnsdottir IB, Barkardottir RB, Egilsson V, Sigurdsson H (1998) Inherited BRCA2 mutation associated with high grade breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 47: 1212–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armes JE, Trute L, White D, Southey MC, Hammet F, Tesoriero A, Hutchins AM, Dite GS, McCredie MRE, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Venter DJ (1999) Distinct molecular pathogeneses of early-onset breast cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a population-based study. Cancer Res 59: 2011–2017

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breast Cancer Trials Committee (1987) Adjuvant tamoxifen in the management of operable breast cancer: the Scottish Trial. Lancet ii: 171–175

  • Chang J, Hilsenbeck SG, Sng JH, Wong J, Ragu GC (2001) Pathological features and BRCA1 mutation screening in premenopausal breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 7: 1739–1742

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delozier T, Julien JP, Juret P, Veyret C, Couette JE, Graic Y, Ollivier JM, de Ranieri E (1986) Adjuvant tamoxifen in postmenopausal breast cancer- preliminary results of a randomized trial. Breast Cancer Res Treatment 7: 105–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (1998) Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet 351: 1451–1467

  • Eeles RA, Powles TJ (2000) Chemoprevention options for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 18: 93S–99S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eiriksdottir G, Barkardottir RB, Agnarsson BA, Johannesdottir G, Olafsdottir K, Egilsson V, Ingvarsson S (1998) High incidence of loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 17p13 in breast tumours from BRCA2 carriers. Oncogene 16: 21–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eisinger F, Nogues C, Guinebretiere JM, Peyrat JP, Bardou VJ, Noguchi T, Vennin P, Sauvan R, Lidereau R, Birnbaum D, Jacquemier J, Sobol H (1999) Novel indications for BRCA1 screening using individual clinical and morphological features. Int J Cancer 84: 263–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falkson HC, Gray R, Wolberg WH, Gilchrist KW, Harris JE, Tormey DC, Falkson G (1990) Adjuvant trial of 12 cycles of CMFPT followed by observation or continuous tamoxifen versus 4 cycles of CMFPT in postmenopausal women with breast cancer – an Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group phase iii Study. J Clin Oncol 8: 599–607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher B, Constantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM, Vogel V, Robidoux A, Dimitrov N, Atkins J, Daly M, Wieand S, Tanchiu E, Ford L, Wolmark N (1998) Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst 90: 1371–1388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilks WR, Thomas A, Spiegelhalter DJ (1994) A language and program for complex Bayesian modelling. Statistician 43: 169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannsson OT, Idvall I, Anderson C, Borg A, Barkadottir RB, Egilsson V, Olsson H (1997) Tumour biological features of BRCA1-induced breast and ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 33: 362–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karp SE, Tonin PN, Begin LR, Martinez JJ, Zhang JC, Pollak MN, Foulkes WD (1997) Influence of BRCA1 mutations on nuclear grade and estrogen receptor status of breast carcinoma in Ashkenazi Jewish women. Cancer 80: 435–441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loman N, Johannsson O, Bendahl PO, Borg A, Ferno M, Olsson H (1998) Steroid receptors in hereditary breast carcinomas associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations or unknown susceptibility genes. Cancer 83: 310–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch BJ, Holden JA, Buys SS, Neuhausen SL, Gaffney DK (1998) Pathobiologic characteristics of hereditary breast cancer. Hum Pathol 29: 1140–1144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Narod SA, Brunet JS, Ghadirian P, Robson M, Heimdal K, Neuhausen SL, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Lerman C, Pasini B, de los Rios P, Weber B, Lynch H (2000) Tamoxifen and risk of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a case-control study. Lancet 356: 1876–1881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon RM, Duffy SW (2002) Cross-issue synthesis: application to breast cancer, tamoxifen and genetic susceptibility. J Epidemiol Biostat (in press)

  • Noguchi S, Kasugai T, Miki Y, Fukutomi T, Emi M, Nomizu T (1999) Clinicopathologic analysis of BRCA1 – or BRCA2-associated hereditary breast cancer in Japanese women. Cancer 85: 2200–2205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osin P, Gusterson BA, Philp E, Waller J, Bartek J, Peto J, Crook T (1998) Predicted anti-oestrogen resistance in BRCA-associated familial breast cancers. Eur J Cancer 34: 1683–1686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips KA, Nichol K, Ozcelik J, Knight J, Done SJ, Goodwin PJ, Andrulis IL (1999) Frequency of p53 mutations in breast carcinomas from Ashkenazi Jewish carriers of BRCA1 mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 469–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Powles T, Eeles R, Ashley S, Easton D, Chang J, Dowsett M, Tidy A, Viggers J, Davey J (1998) Interim analysis of the incidence of breast cancer in the Royal Marsden Hospital tamoxifen randomised chemoprevention trial. Lancet 352: 98–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rebbeck TR (2000) Prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 18: 100S–103S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robson M, Gilewski T, Haas B, Levin D, Borgen P, Rajan P, Hischaut Y, Pressman P, Rosen PP, Lesser ML, Norton L, Offit K (1998) BRCA-associated breast cancer in young women. J Clin Oncol 16: 1642–1649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutqvist LE, Hatschek T, Ryden S, Bergh J, Bengtsson NO, Carstenssen J, Nordenskjold B, Wallgren A (1996) Randomized trial of two versus five years of adjuvant tamoxifen for postmenopausal early stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 1543–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrag D, Kuntz KM, Garber JE, Weeks JC (2000) Life expectancy gains from cancer prevention strategies for women with breast cancer and BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. J Amer Med Assoc 283: 617–624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang NLS, Pang CP, Yeo W, Choy KW, Lam PK, Suen M, Law LK, King WWK, Johnson P, Hjelm M (1999) Prevalence of mutations in the BRCA1 gene among Chinese patients with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 882–885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tirkkonen M, Johanson O, Agnarsson BA, Olsson H, Ingvarsson S, Karhu R, Tanner M, Isola J, Barkardottir RB, Borg A, Kallionemi OP (1997) Distinct somatic genetic changes associated with tumor progression in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutations. Cancer Res 57: 1222–1227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tormey DC, Gray R, Abeloff MD, Roseman DL, Gilchrist KW, Barylak EJ, Stott P, Falkson G (1992) Adjuvant therapy with a doxorubicin regimen and long-term tamoxifen in premenopausal breast-cancer patients – and Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol 10: 1848–1856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoog LC, Brekelmans CTM, Seynaeve C, van den Bosch LMC, Dahmen G, van Geel AN, Tilanus-Linthorst MMA, Bartels CCM, Wagner A, van den Ouweland A, Devilee P, Meijers-Heijboer EJ, Klijn JGM (1998) Survival and tumour characteristics of breast-cancer patients with germline mutations of BRCA1. Lancet 351: 316–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veronesi U, Maisonneuve P, Costa A, Sacchini V, Maltoni C, Robertson C, Rotmensz N, Boyle P (1998) Prevention of breast cancer with tamoxifen: preliminary findings from the Italian randomised trial among hysterectomised women. Lancet 352: 93–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner TMU, Möslinger RA, Muhr D, Langbauer G, Hirtenlehner K, Concin H, Doeller W, Haid A, Lang AH, Mayer P, Roff E, Kubista E, Amirimani B, Helbich T, Becherer A, Scheiner O, Breiteneder H, Borg A, Devilee P, Oefner P, Zielinski C (1998) BRCA1-related breast cancer in Austrian breast and ovarian cancer families: specific BRCA1 mutations and pathological characteristics. Int J Cancer 77: 354–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Peter Boyle and David Spiegelhalter for helpful remarks. We thank a referee for drawing our attention to several studies which we had missed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S W Duffy.

APPENDIX 1

APPENDIX 1

Approximate confidence interval for the two-stage method

The square of the standard error of R is the variance of R, denoted V(R).

where C represents the covariance. Noting that V(p) =V(1-p) and assuming R+, R and p are independent, the above can be estimated as

Using the delta method we can approximate the standard error of the logarithm of the relative risk R as

We then calculate the confidence interval on the log relative risk and retransform to the linear scale in the usual way.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duffy, S., Nixon, R. Estimates of the likely prophylactic effect of tamoxifen in women with high risk BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Br J Cancer 86, 218–221 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600064

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links