Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Prognostic significance of blood pressure measured in the office, at home and during ambulatory monitoring in older patients in general practice

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 19, pages 801–807 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to assess the prognostic significance of out-of-the-office blood pressure (BP) measurement in older patients in general practice, and to compare the results for BP measured in the office, at home and during 24-h ambulatory monitoring. All registerd patients who were 60 years or older were eligible for the study, except when bedridden, demented or admitted in a home for sick elderly people, or when they had suffered a myocardial infarction or stroke. After baseline measurements in 1990–1993, incidence of major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke) was ascertained in 2002–2003 and related to the BPs by use of multivariate Cox regression analysis. Age of the 391 patients averaged 71±9 years; 40% were men. During median follow-up of 10.9 years, 86 patients (22%) suffered a cardiovascular event. The adjusted relative hazard rate, associated with a 1 s.d. increment in systolic BP was 1.13 for office BP (NS), and, respectively, 1.32, 1.33 and 1.42, for home, daytime and night time BP (P⩽0.01 for all). Results were similar for diastolic BP. The prognostic significance of all out-of-the-office BPs was independent of office BP. The prognostic value of home BP was equal to (systolic) or even better (diastolic) than that of daytime BP. Night time BP predicted cardiovascular events independent of all other BPs. Prognosis of white-coat hypertension was similar to that of true normotension, but better than in sustained hypertension. In conclusion, the prognostic value of home BP is better than that of office BP in older patients in primary care, and is at least equal to that of daytime ambulatory BP. The prognosis of patients with white-coat hypertension is similar to that of true normotensives.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perloff D, Sokolow M, Cowan RM, Juster RP . Prognostic value of ambulatory BP measurements: further analysis. J Hypertens 1989; 7 (Suppl 3): S3–S10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Verdecchia P et al. Ambulatory BP: an independent predictor of prognosis in essential hypertension. Hypertension 1994; 24: 793–801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ohkubo T et al. Prediction of mortality by ambulatory BP monitoring versus screening BP measurements: a pilot study in Ohasama. J Hypertens 1997; 15: 357–364.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Khattar RS, Senior R, Lahiri A . Cardiovascular outcome in white-coat versus sustained mild hypertension: a 10-year follow-up study. Circulation 1998; 98: 1892–1897.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ohkubo T et al. Home BP measurement has a stronger predictive power for mortality than does screening BP measurement: a population-based observation in Ohasama, Japan. J Hypertens 1998; 16: 971–975.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Redon J et al. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in refractory hypertension: a prospective study. Hypertension 1998; 31: 712–718.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Khattar RS et al. Prediction of coronary and cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality by direct continuous ambulatory BP monitoring in essential hypertension. Circulation 1999; 100: 1071–1076.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Staessen JA et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk using conventional and ambulatory blood pressure in older patients with systolic hypertension. JAMA 1999; 282: 539–546.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fagard RH et al. Response to antihypertensive therapy in older patients with sustained and nonsustained systolic hypertension. Circulation 2000; 102: 1139–1144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kario K et al. Silent and clinically overt stroke in older Japanese subjects with white-coat and sustained hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 238–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Celis H et al. Cardiovascular risk in white-coat and sustained hypertensive patients. Blood Pressure 2002; 11: 352–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clement DL et al. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2407–2415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gustavsen PH, Hoegholm A, Bang LE, Kristensen KS . White-coat hypertension is a cardiovascular risk factor: a 10-year follow-up study. J Hum Hypertens 2003; 17: 811–817.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bobrie G et al. Cardiovascular prognosis of ‘masked hypertension’ detected by blood pressure self-measurement in elderly treated hypertensive patients. JAMA 2004; 17: 1342–1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pierdomenico SD et al. Cardiovascular and renal events in uncomplicated mild hypertensive patients with sustained and white-coat hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2004; 17: 876–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fagard RH, Celis H . Prognostic significance of various characteristics of out-of-the-office blood pressure. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 1663–1666.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fagard RH, Van den Enden M, Leeman M, Warling X . Survey on treatment of hypertension and implementation of World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension risk stratification in primary care in Belgium. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 1297–1302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fagard R, Brguljan J, Thijs L, Staessen J . Prediction of the actual awake and asleep blood pressures by various methods of 24-h pressure analysis. J Hypertens 1996; 14: 557–563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Brien E et al. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 821–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Staessen JA et al. Randomized double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Lancet 1997; 350: 757–764.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bjorklund K et al. Isolated ambulatory hypertension predicts cardiovascular morbidity in elderly men. Circulation 2003; 107: 1297–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohkubo T et al. Prognostic significance of the nocturnal decline in blood pressure in individuals with and without high 24-h blood pressure: the Ohasama study. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 2183–2189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Khattar RS et al. Effect of aging on the prognostic significance of ambulatory systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure in essential hypertension. Circulation 2001; 104: 783–789.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bjorklund K et al. Prognostic significance of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure characteristics for cardiovascular morbidity in a population of elderly men. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 1691–1697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Guidelines Committee. 2003 European Society of Hyypertension—European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1011–1053.

  26. Bovet P et al. Assessisng the prevalence of hypertension in populations: are we doing it right? J Hypertens 2003; 21: 509–517.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the secretarial assistance of N Ausseloos.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular and Cardiovascular Research, Hypertension and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, UZ Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium

    R H Fagard, C Van Den Broeke & P De Cort

Authors
  1. R H Fagard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C Van Den Broeke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P De Cort
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R H Fagard.

Additional information

The study was presented at the 14th European Meeting on Hypertension, Paris, France, June 13–17, 2004.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fagard, R., Van Den Broeke, C. & De Cort, P. Prognostic significance of blood pressure measured in the office, at home and during ambulatory monitoring in older patients in general practice. J Hum Hypertens 19, 801–807 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001903

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001903

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links