Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

What outcomes matter to patients?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study estimates the relative value to patients of physical, mental, and social health when making treatment decisions. Despite recommendations to use patient preferences to guide treatment decisions, little is known about how patients value different dimensions of their health status.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional data from quasi-experimental, prospective study.

SETTING: Forty-six primary care clinics in managed care organizations in California, Texas, Minnesota, Maryland, and Colorado.

PATIENTS: Consecutive adult outpatients (n=16,689) visiting primary care providers.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) health-related quality of life and patient preferences for their current health status, as assessed by standard gamble and time trade-off utility methods, were measured. Only 5% of the variance in standard gamble and time trade-off was explained by the SF-12. Within the SF-12, physical health contributes substantially to patient preferences (35%–55% of the relative variance explained); however, patients also place a high value on their mental health (29%–42%) and on social health (16%–23%). The contribution of mental health to preferences is stronger in patients with chronic conditions.

CONCLUSIONS: Patient preferences, which should be driving treatment decisions, are related to mental and social health nearly as much as they are to physical health. Thus, medical practice should strive to balance concerns for all three health domains in making treatment decisions, and health care resources should target medical treatments that improve mental and social health outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ditto PH, Druley JA, Moore KA, Danks JH, Smucker WD. Fates worse than death: the role of valued life activities in health-state evaluations. Health Psychol. 1996;15(5):332–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gold M, Siegel J, Russell L, Weinstein M. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB, for the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA. 1996;276:1253–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Siegel JE, Weinstein MC, Russell LB, Gold MR, for the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. JAMA. 1996;276:1339–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nease RF, Kneeland T, O’Connor GT, et al. Variation in patient utilities for outcomes of the management of chronic stable angina. JAMA. 1995;273(15):1185–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Owens DK. Spine update: patient preferences and the development of practice guidelines. Spine. 1998;23(9):1073–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kleinman A. On illness meanings and clinical interpretation: not ‘rational man’, but a rational approach to man the sufferer/man the healer. Cult Med Psychiatry. 1981;5(4):373–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Perez Stable EJ, Miranda J, Munoz RF, Ying YW. Depression in medical outpatients: underrecognition and misdiagnosis. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(5):1083–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Kroenke K, et al. Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care: the PRIME MD 1000 study. JAMA. 1994;272(22):1749–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson TL, Stoudemire A, Mitchell WD, Grant RL. Underrecognition of patients’ psychosocial distress in a university hospital medical clinic. Am J Psychiatry. 1983;140:158–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wells KB, Sturm R, Sherbourne CD, Meredith LS. Caring for Depression. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fryback DG, Dasbach EJ, Klein R, et al. The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study: initial catalog of health-related quality factors. Med Decis Making. 1993;13:89–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization. World Health Organization constitution. In: Basic Documents. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hall JA, Epstein AM, McNeil BJ. Multidimensionality of health status in an elderly population: construct validity of a measurement battery. Med Care. 1989;27(3):S168–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stewart AL, Ware JE Jr. Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach, Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Patrick DL, Erickson P. Health Status and Health Policy: Quality of Life in Health Care Evaluation and Resource Allocation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bennett KJ, Torrance GW. Measuring health state preferences and utilities: rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble techniques. In: Spiker B, ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996:253–65.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Revicki DA, Kaplan RM. Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 1993;2:477–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsevat J, Solzen JG, Kuntz KM, et al. Health values of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus: relationship to mental health and physical functioning. Med Care. 1996;34:44–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsevat J, Dawson NV, Wu AW, et al. Health values of hospitalized patients 80 years or older. JAMA. 1998;279(5):371–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bosch JL, Hunink MGM. The relationship between descriptive and valuational quality-of-life measures in patients with intermittent claudication. Med Decis Making. 1996;16:217–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fryback DG, Lawrence WF, Martin PA, Klein R, Klein BE. Predicting quality of well-being scores from the SF-36: results from the Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study. Med Decis Making. 1997;17(1):1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wells KB. The design of Partners in Care: evaluating the cost-effectiveness of improving care for depression in primary care. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1999;34:20–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Torrance G. Measurement of health-state utilities for economic appraisal: a review. J Health Econ. 1986;5:1–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lenert LA, Cher DJ, Goldstein MK, Bergen MR, Garber A. The effect of search procedures on utility elicitations. Med Decis Making. 1998;18(1):76–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Albertsen PC, Nease RF Jr, Potosky AL. Assessment of patient preferences among men with prostate cancer. J Urol. 1998;159(1):158–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Feeney DH, Torrance GW, Furlong WJ. Health Utilities Index. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Reven Publishers; 1996:239–52.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kind P. The EuroQoL Instrument: an index of health-related quality of life. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996:191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kaplan RM, Anderson JP. The general health policy model: an integrated approach. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996;309–22.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller S. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stewart AL, Sherbourne CD, Hays RD et al. Summary and discussion of MOS measures. In: Stewart AL, Ware JE Jr, eds. Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1992:345–71.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-12: How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. 2nd ed. Boston, Mass: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  34. World Health Organization. Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) Core Version 2.1 Interviewer’s Manual. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cassel EJ. The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. N Engl J Med. 1982;306(11):639–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Donald CA, Ware JE Jr. The Quantification of Social Contacts and Resources. R-2937-HHS. Santa Monica, Calif: RAND; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Depression Guidelines Panel. Depression in Primary Care: Volume 2. Treatment of Major Depression. Rockville, Md: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1993. AHCPR publication 93-0551.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Miranda J, Munoz R. Intervention for minor depression in primary care patients. Psychosom Med. 1994;56(2):136–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Spiegel D. Health caring: psychosocial support for patients with cancer. Cancer Suppl. 1994;74(4):1453–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sobel DS. Rethinking medicine: improving health outcomes with cost-effective psychosocial interventions. Psychosom Med. 1995;57:234–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Rubenstein LV, McCoy JM, Cope DW, et al. Improving patient quality of life with feedback to physicians about functional status. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:607–714.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Isselbacher KJ, Braunwald E, Wilson JD, Martin JB, Fauci AS, Kasper DL. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 13th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. RAND, 1700 Main St., 90407-2138, Santa Monica, CA

    Cathy Donald Sherbourne PhD, Roland Sturm PhD & Kenneth B. Wells MD, MPH

  2. UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute and Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif.

    Kenneth B. Wells MD, MPH

Authors
  1. Cathy Donald Sherbourne PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roland Sturm PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kenneth B. Wells MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This work was funded by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (R01-HS08349).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sherbourne, C.D., Sturm, R. & Wells, K.B. What outcomes matter to patients?. J GEN INTERN MED 14, 357–363 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00354.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00354.x

Key words

Search

Navigation