Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patients’ perceptions of omitted examinations and tests

A qualitative analysis

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To understand the nature of patients’ expectations for parts of the physical examination and for diagnostic testing and the meaning patients ascribe to their desires.

DESIGN: Qualitative inquiry based on patient interviews and focused on perceived diagnostic omissions as “critical incidents.”

SETTING: Three general internal medicine practices (21 practitioners) in one mid-sized northern California city.

PATIENTS: Of 687 patients visiting these practice sites and completing a detailed questionnaire, 125 reported one or more omissions of care and 90 completed an in-depth telephone interview. This study focuses on the 56 patients interviewed who did not receive desired components of the physical examination or diagnostic tests.

MEASUREMENTS: Qualitative analysis of key themes underlying patients’ unmet expectations for examinations and tests, as derived from verbatim transcripts of the 56 interviews.

MAIN RESULTS: The 56 patients perceived a total of 113 investigative omissions falling into four broad categories: physical examination (47 omissions), conventional tests (43), highcost tests (10), and unspecified investigations (13). Patients considered omitted investigations to have value along both pragmatic and symbolic dimensions. Diagnostic maneuvers had pragmatic value when they were seen to advance the technical aims of diagnosis, prognosis, or therapy. They had symbolic value when their underlying purpose was to enrich the patient-physician relationship. Patients in this study were often uncomfortable with clinical uncertainty, distrusted empiric therapy, endorsed early detection, and frequently interpreted failure to examine or test as failure to care.

CONCLUSIONS: When patients express disappointment at failing to receive tests or examinations, they may actually be expressing concerns about the basis of their illness, the rationale for therapy, or the physician-patient relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cutler P. Problem Solving in Clinical Medicine. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Praiss I, Gjerde C. Cost containment through medical education. JAMA. 1980;244:53–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eisenberg JM. The internist as gatekeeper: preparing the general internist for a new role. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:537–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shulkin DJ, Rosenstein AH. Promoting cost-effective physician behavior. Healthc Financ Manage. 1993;47:48,50,52–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bastian H. Speaking up for ourselves: the evolution of consumer advocacy in health care. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999;4:127–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Consumerism rampant: a critique of the view of medicine as a commercial enterprise. Mt Sinai J Med. 1993;60:15–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gallagher TH, Lo B, Chesney M, Christensen K. How do physicians respond to patients’ requests for costly, unindicated services? J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:663–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kravitz RL, Cope DW, Bhrany V, Leake B. Internal medicine patients’ expectations for care during office visits. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:75–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Joos SK, Hickam DH, Borders LM. Patients’ desires and satisfaction in general medicine clinics. Public Health Rep. 1993;108:751–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brody DS, Miller SM, Lerman CE, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Blum MJ. The relationship between patients’ satisfaction with their physicians and perceptions about interventions they desired and received. Med Care. 1989;13:562–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Good MJD, Good BJ, Nassi AJ. Patient requests in primary health care settings: development and validation of a research instrument. J Behav Med. 1983;6:151–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marple RL, Kroenke K, Lucey CR, Wilder J, Lucas CA. Concerns and expectations in patients presenting with physical complaints: frequency, physician perceptions and actions, and 2-week outcome. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1482–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sox HC, Marguiles I, Sox CH. Psychologically mediated effects of diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med. 1981;95(6):680–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. La Combe MA. What is it patients want? Am J Med 1995;99:588–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lazare A, Eisenthal S, Frank A. A negotiated approach to the clinical encounter, II: conflict and negotiation. In: Lazare A, ed. Outpatient Psychiatry: Diagnosis and Treatment. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Botelho RJ. A negotiation model for the doctor-patient relationship. Fam Pract. 1992;9:210–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE. Expanding patient involvement in care: effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bertakis KD, Callahan EJ, Helms LJ, Azari R, Robbins JA, Miller J. Physician practice styles and patient outcomes: differences between family practice and general internal medicine. Med Care. 1998;36:879–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kravitz RL, Callahan EJ, Paterniti D, Antonius D, Dunham M, Lewis CE. Prevalence and sources of patients’ unmet expectations for care. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:730–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller RH, Lipton HL, Duke KS. Health System Change in the Greater Sacramento Area. Sacramento, Calif: Sierra Health Foundation; June 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lowes RL. Are you expected to see too many patients? Med Econ. 1995;72:52–3, 57–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Flanagan JC. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull. 1954;51:327–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bradley CP. Uncomfortable prescribing decisions: a critical incident study. BMJ. 1992;304:294–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bradley CP. Turning anecdoetes into data—the critical incident technique. Fam Pract. 1992;9:98–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sox HC, Blatt MA, Higgins MC, Marton KI. Medical Decision Making. Boston, Mass: Butterworth Publications; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Feinstein AR. The ‘chagrin factor’ and qualitative decision analysis. Arch Intern Med. 1985;145(7):1257–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ware JE Jr, Brook RH, Rogers WH, et al. Comparison of health outcomes at a health maintenance organisation with those of fee-for-service care. Lancet. 1986;1(8488):1017–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ware JE Jr, Bayliss MS, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Tarlov AR. Differences in 4-year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and fee-for-service systems: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1996;276:1039–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McCall TB. Some HMOs are bad news. (Is yours?) Redbook. 1996;187(4):47,48.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rosenthal GE, Shannon SE. The use of patient perceptions in the evaluation of health-care delivery systems. Med Care. 1997;35(11 suppl):NS58–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kravitz RL. Patients’ expectations for medical care: an expanded formulation based on review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 1996;53:3–27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Skelton JA, Croyle RT, eds. Mental Representation in Health and Illness. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kee F. Patients’ prerogatives and perceptions of benefit. BMJ. 1996;312(7036):958–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mazur DJ, Merz JF. Patients’ interpretations of verbal expressions of probability: implications for securing informed consent to medical interventions. Behav Sci Law. 1994;12(4):417–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Froehlich GW, Welch HG. Meeting walk-in patients’ expectations for testing: effects on satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:470–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rose G, Segesten K. Someone who cares—patients’ experiences concerning health examinations. Scand J Caring Sci 1995;9:105–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. McLeod PJ, Tamblyn R, Benaroya S, Snell L. Faculty ratings of resident humanism predict patient satisfaction ratings in ambulatory medical clinics. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:321–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lazare A, Eisenthal S, Wasserman L. The customer approach to patienthood. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1975;32:553–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dr. Kravitz was a Picker/Commonwealth Faculty Scholar at the time this work was initiated.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kravitz, R.L., Callahan, E.J. Patients’ perceptions of omitted examinations and tests. J GEN INTERN MED 15, 38–45 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.12058.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.12058.x

Key Words

Navigation