Skip to main content
Log in

Managed care, professional autonomy, and income

Effects on physician career satisfaction

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CONTEXT: Career satisfaction among physicians is a topic of importance to physicians in practice, physicians in training, health system administrators, physician organization executives, and consumers. The level of career satisfaction derived by physicians from their work is a basic yet essential element in the functioning of the health care system.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the degree to which professional autonomy, compensation, and managed care are determinants of career satisfaction among physicians.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis using data from 1996–97 Community Tracking Study physician telephone survey.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative sample of 12,385 direct patient care physicians. The survey response rate was 65%.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Overall career satisfaction among U.S. physicians.

RESULTS: Bivariate results show that physicians with low managed care revenues are significantly more likely to be “very satisfied” than are physicians with high managed care revenue (P<.05), and that physicians with low managed care revenues are significantly more likely to report higher levels of clinical freedom than are physicians with high managed care revenue (P<.05). Multivariate analyses demonstrate that, among our measures, traditional core professional values and autonomy are the most important determinants of career satisfaction after controlling for all other factors. Relative income is also an important independent predictor. Multiple dimensions of professional autonomy hold up as strong, independent predictors of career satisfaction, while the effect of managed care does not. Managed care appears to exert its effect on satisfaction through its impact on professional autonomy, not through income reduction.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that when managed care (or other influences) erode professional autonomy, the result is a highly negative impact on physician career satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melville A. Job satisfaction in general practice: implications for prescribing. Soc Sci Med. 1980;14A:495–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. DiMatteo MR, Sherbourne CD, Hays RD, et al. Physicians’ characteristics influence patients’ adherence to medical treatment: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Health Psychol. 1993;12:93–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Linn LS, Yager J, Cope D, Leake B. Health status, job satisfaction, job stress, and life satisfaction among academic and clinical faculty. JAMA. 1985;254:2775–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haas JS, Cook EF, Puopolo AL, Burstin HR, Cleary PD, Brennan TA. Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction? J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:122–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Comarow A. America’s top HMOs. Behind the HMO rankings. Our second set of ratings covers 223 plans in 46 states. US News and World Report. October 13, 1997:68.

  6. Buchbinder SB, Wilson M, Melick CF, Powe NR. Estimates of costs of primary care physician turnover. Am J Manag Care. 1999;5:1431–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baker LC, Cantor JC. Physician satisfaction under managed care. Health Aff. 1993;12:258–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kerr EA, Hays RD, Mittman BS, Siu AL, Leake BL, Brook RH. Primary care physicians’ satisfaction with quality of care in California capitated medical groups. JAMA. 1997;278:308–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hadley J, Mitchell JM. Effects of HMO market penetration on physicians’ work effort and satisfaction. Health Aff. 1997;16:99–111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Grumbach K, Osmond D, Vranizan K, Jaffe D, Bindman AB. Primary care physicians’ experience of financial incentives in managed-care systems. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1516–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schulz R, Scheckler WE, Moberg DP, Johnson PR. Changing nature of physician satisfaction with health maintenance organization and fee-for-service practices. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:321–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Warren MG, Weitz R, Kulis S. Physician satisfaction in a changing health care environment: the impact of challenges to professional autonomy, authority, and dominance. J Health Soc Behav. 1998;39:356–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Linzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, et al. Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the physician worklife study. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:441–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Warren MG, Weitz R, Kulis S. The impact of managed care on physicians. Health Care Manage Rev. 1999;24:44–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hadley J, Mitchell JM, Sulmasy DP, Bloche MG. Perceived financial incentives, HMO market penetration, and physicians’ practice styles and satisfaction. Health Serv Res. 1999;34:307–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Donelan K, Blendon RJ, Lundberg GD, et al. The new medical marketplace: physicians’ views. Health Aff. 1997;16:139–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bates AS, Harris LE, Tierney WM, Wolinsky FD. Dimensions and correlates of physician work satisfaction in a midwestern city. Med Care. 1998;36:610–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lewis JM, Barnhart FD, Howard BL, Carson DI, Nace EP. Work satisfaction in the lives of physicians. Tex Med. 1993;89:54–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schulz R, Girard C, Scheckler WE. Physician satisfaction in a managed care environment. J Fam Pract. 1992;34:298–304.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chuck JM, Nesbitt TS, Kwan J, Kam SM. Is being a doctor still fun? West J Med. 1993;159:665–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ludmerer KM. Instilling professionalism in medical education. JAMA. 1999;282:881–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Freidson E. Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Swick HM, Szenas P, Danoff D, Whitcomb ME. Teaching professionalism in undergraduate medical education. JAMA. 1999;282:830–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Halvorsen JG. Professionalism reconsidered. Priorities for physicians. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:173–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Barry D, Cyran E, Anderson RJ. Common issues in medical professionalism: room to grow. Am J Med. 2000;108:136–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wynia MK, Latham SR, Kao AC, Berg JW, Emanuel LL. Medical professionalism in society. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1612–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Reynolds PP. Reaffirming professionalism through the education community. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:609–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Konrad TR, Williams ES, Linzer M, et al. Measuring physician job satisfaction in a changing workplace and a challenging environment. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. Society of General Internal Medicine. Med Care. 1999;37:1174–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams ES, Konrad TR, Linzer M, et al. Refining the measurement of physician job satisfaction: results from the Physician Worklife Survey. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. Society of General Internal Medicine. Med Care. 1999; 37:1140–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kemper P, Blumenthal D, Corrigan JM, et al. The design of the Community Tracking Study: a longitudinal study of health system change and its effects on people. Inquiry. 1996;33:195–206.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Metcalf CE, Kemper P, Kohn LT, Pickreign JD. Site Definition and Sample Design for the Community Tracking Study. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 1996. (Technical Publication No. 1.)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Keil L, Chattopadhyay M, Potter F, Reed MC. Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round 1 Survey Methodology Report. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 1998. (Technical Publication No. 9).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Reschovsky JD, Edson D, Sewall A, et al. Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Public Use File: Users’ Guide (Round One, Release 1). Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 1998. (Technical Publication No. 10.)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cunningham PJ, Grossman JM, St Peter RF, Lesser CS. Managed care and physicians’ provision of charity care. JAMA. 1999;281:1087–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang J, Yu KF. What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998;280:1690–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hilzenrath D. HMO to Leave Care Decisions Up to Doctors. Washington Post. November 9, 1999:A1.

  38. Freudenheim M. Big HMO to Give Decisions on Care Back to Doctors. New York Times. November 9, 1999.

  39. Jacobson PD, Pomfret SD. ERISA litigation and physician autonomy. JAMA. 2000;283:921–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey J. Stoddard MD.

Additional information

This work was supported by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The authors express their appreciation to Jack Hadley, Paul Ginsburg, Ann Greiner, Peter Kemper, Joy Grossman, and James D. Reschovsky at the Center for Studying Health System Change for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stoddard, J.J., Hargraves, J.L., Reed, M. et al. Managed care, professional autonomy, and income. J GEN INTERN MED 16, 675–684 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.01206.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.01206.x

Key words

Navigation