Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer screening the importance of foreign birth as a barrier to care

  • Populations At Risk
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CONTEXT: Racial/ethnic groups comprised largely of foreign-born individuals have lower rates of cancer screening than white Americans. Little is known about whether these disparities are related primarily to their race/ethnicity or birthplace.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether foreign birthplace explains some racial/ethnic disparities in cancer screening.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: Cross-sectional study using 1998 data from the National Health Interview Survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Completion of cervical, breast, or colorectal cancer screening.

RESULTS: Of respondents, 15% were foreign born. In analyses adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and illness burden, black respondents were as or more likely to report cancer screening than white respondents; however, Hispanic and Asian-American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) respondents were significantly less likely to report screening for most cancers. When race/ethnicity and birthplace were considered together, U.S.-born Hispanic and AAPI respondents were as likely to report cancer screening as U.S.-born whites; however, foreign-born white (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.82), Hispanic (AOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.79), and AAPI respondents (AOR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.39) were less likely than U.S.-born whites to report Pap smears. Foreign-born Hispanic and AAPI respondents were also less likely to report fecal occult blood testing (FOBT); AORs, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.98; and 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.96, respectively); and sigmoidoscopy (AORs, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.97; and 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.99, respectively). Furthermore, foreign-born AAPI respondents were less likely to report mammography (AOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.86). Adjusting for access to care partially attenuated disparities among foreign-born respondents.

CONCLUSION: Foreign birthplace may explain some disparities previously attributed to race or ethnicity, and is an important barrier to cancer screening, even after adjustment for other factors. Increasing access to health care may improve disparities among foreign-born persons to some degree, but further study is needed to understand other barriers to screening among the foreign-born.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schmidley AD. Profile of the Foreign-Born Population in the United States: 2000. US Census Bureau, Current Population Reports. Series P23-206. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fruchter RG, Remy JC, Burnett WS, Boyce JG. Cervical cancer in immigrant Caribbean women. Am J Public Health 1986;67:797–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Warda US. Demographic predictors of cancer screening among Filipino and Korean immigrants in the United States. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:62–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tu SP, Yasui Y, Kuniyuki A, et al. Breast cancer screening among Cambodian American women. Cancer Detect Prev. 2000;24:549–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor VM, Schwartz SM, Jackson JC, et al. Cervical cancer screening among Cambodian American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:541–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fruchter RG, Wright C, Habenstreit B, Remy JC, Boyce JG, Imperato PJ. Screening for cervical and breast cancer among Caribbean immigrants. J Community Health 1985;10:121–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schulmeister L, Lifsey DS. Cervical cancer screening knowledge, behaviors, and beliefs of Vietnamese women. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999;26:879–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kagawa-Singer M, Pourat N. Asian American and Pacific Islander breast and cervical carcinoma screening rates and healthy people 2000 objectives. Cancer 2001;89:696–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fulton JP, Rakowski W, Jones AC. Determinants of breast cancer screening among inner-city Hispanic women in comparison with other inner-city women. Public Health Rep. 1995;110:476–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Perez-Stable EJ, Otero Sabogal R, Sabogal F, Mcphee SJ, Hiatt RA. Self-reported use of cancer screening tests among Latinos and Anglos in a prepaid health plan. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1073–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ. Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among Hispanic women in the United States and Puerto Rico, 1998–99. Prev Med. 2002;34:242–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ. Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among Asian and Pacific Islander women in the United States, 1994–1997. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:597–603.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thamer M, Rinehart C. Public and private health insurance of US foreign-born residents: implications of the 1996 welfare reform law. Ethn Health. 1998;3:19–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ku L, Matani S. Left out: immigrants’ access to health care and insurance. Health Aff. 2001;20:247–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fox SA. The importance of physician communication on breast cancer screening of older women. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:2058–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fox SA. The effect of physician-patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups. Med Care. 1991;1065–82.

  17. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Katz SJ, Welch HG. Is language a barrier to the use of preventive services? J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:472–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Solis JM, Marks G, Garcia M, Shelton D. Acculturation, access to care, and use of preventative services by Hispanics: findings from HHANES 1982–1984. Am J Public Health. 1990;80(suppl):11–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. National Center for Health Statistics. 1998 National Health Interview Survey. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm. Accessed June 10, 2002.

  20. US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shah BV, Barnwell BG, Bieler GS. SUDAAN User’s Manual. Release 7.5. NC: Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Juon HS, Choi Y, Kim MT. Cancer screening behaviors among Korean-American women. Cancer Detect Prev. 2000;24:589–601.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mcphee SJ, Stewart S, Brock KC, Bird JA, Jenkins CN, Pham GQ. Factors associated with breast and cervical cancer screening practices among Vietnamese American women. Cancer Detect Prev. 1997;1:510–21.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shankar S, Figueroa-Valles N. Cancer knowledge and misconceptions: a survey of immigrant Salvadorean women. Ethn Dis. 1999;9:201–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Phipps E, Cohen MH, Sort R, Braitman LE. A pilot study of cancer knowledge and screening behaviors of Vietnamese and Cambodian women. Health Care Women Int. 1999;20:195–207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tanjasiri SP, Sablan-Santos L. Breast cancer screening among Chamorro women in southern California. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001;10:479–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Peragallo NP, Fox PG, Alba ML. Breast care among Latino immigrant women in the US. Health Care Women Int. 1998;19:165–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pettersson F, Bjorkholm E, Naslund I. Evaluation of screening for cervical cancer in Sweden: trends in incidence and mortality 1958–80. Int J Epidemiol. 1985;14:521–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sobue T, Suzuki T, Hashimoto S, Yokoi N, Fujimoto I. A case-control study of the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in Osaka, Japan. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1988;79:1269–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Anonymous. Update: National breast and cervical cancer early detection program: July 1991–September 1995. MMWR. 1996;45:484–7.

  31. Nystron L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjold B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 2002;359:909–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. A randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood testing: results after 13 years and seven biennial screening rounds. Gut. 2002;50:29–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP, Weiss NS, Quesenberry CP Jr. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:653–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Choe JH, Koepsell TD, Heagerty PJ. Differences in colorectal cancer survival between foreign-born and US-born Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(suppl):154 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hedeen AN, White E, Taylor V. Ethnicity and birthplace in relation to tumor size and stage in Asian American women with breast cancer. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1248–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hedeen AN, White E. Breast cancer size and stage in Hispanic American women, by birthplace: 1992–95. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:122–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mita Sanghavi Goel MD.

Additional information

Dr. Goel is supported by an institutional National Research Service Award (5T32PE11001-13) and by the Ryoichi Sasakawa Fund. Dr. Wee is supported by a career development award from the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK02962-02). Dr. McCarthy is the recipient of a First Independent Research and Transition Award from the National Cancer Institute (R29 CA79052). Dr. Ngo-Metzger is supported by the National Cancer Institute Asian American Network for Cancer Awareness, Research and Training (U01 CA86322). Dr. Phillips is supported by a Mid-Career Investigator Award from the National Institutes of Health (K24 AT00589-01A1).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goel, M.S., Wee, C.C., McCarthy, E.P. et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer screening the importance of foreign birth as a barrier to care. J GEN INTERN MED 18, 1028–1035 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.20807.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.20807.x

Key words

Navigation