Elsevier

Ambulatory Pediatrics

Volume 5, Issue 2, March–April 2005, Pages 75-82
Ambulatory Pediatrics

Measuring the Effectiveness of a Collaborative for Quality Improvement in Pediatric Asthma Care: Does Implementing the Chronic Care Model Improve Processes and Outcomes of Care?

https://doi.org/10.1367/A04-106R.1Get rights and content

Objective.—To examine whether a collaborative to improve pediatric asthma care positively influenced processes and outcomes of that care.

Methods.—Medical record abstractions and patient/parent interviews were used to make pre- and postintervention comparisons of patients at 9 sites that participated in the evaluation of a Breakthrough Series (BTS) collaborative for asthma care with patients at 4 matched control sites.

Setting.—Thirteen primary care clinics.

Patients.—Three hundred eighty-five asthmatic children who received care at an intervention clinic and 126 who received care at a control clinic (response rate = 76%).

Intervention.—Three 2-day educational sessions for quality improvement teams from participating sites followed by 3 “action” periods over the course of a year.

Results.—The overall process of asthma care improved significantly in the intervention group but remained unchanged in the control group (change in process score +13% vs 0%; P < .0001). Patients in the intervention group were more likely than patients in the control group to monitor their peak flows (70% vs 43%; P < .0001) and to have a written action plan (41% vs 22%; P = .001). Patients in the intervention group had better general health-related quality of life (scale score 80 vs 77; P = .05) and asthma-specific quality of life related to treatment problems (scale score 89 vs 85; P < .05).

Conclusions.—The intervention improved some important aspects of processes of care that have previously been linked to better outcomes. Patients who received care at intervention clinics also reported higher general and asthma-specific quality of life.

Section snippets

METHODS

To evaluate whether the ICIC BTS collaborative to improve pediatric asthma care positively influenced processes and outcomes, we conducted a controlled pre- and postintervention study. The ICIC BTS collaborative for asthma began February 15, 2000, and ended March 1, 2001. Twenty-six geographically dispersed health care organizations participated in the collaborative. Twenty-four of the organizations provided care to children and adolescents, and 9 of these organizations agreed to take part in

Population Characteristics

We obtained survey data from parents of 385 children (296 aged 2–11 years, 89 aged 12–17 years) who received care at an intervention clinic and 126 children (70 aged 2–11 years and 56 aged 12–17 years) who received care in a control clinic (response rate = 76%, using AAPOR definition RR4).27 Of those surveyed, 216 parents from the intervention group (56%) and 88 of the parents from the control group (70%) also agreed to have their child's medical record abstracted, as did an additional 132

DISCUSSION

Children receiving care from clinics participating in the BTS collaborative for asthma care had significant improvements in processes of care and had better scores on 2 quality-of-life measures after the intervention was completed. Considering that most of the clinics participating in this BTS collaborative were Bureau of Primary Healthcare centers, the improvements observed are somewhat surprising, given their limited resources and the difficult environment in which these centers operate. In a

LIMITATIONS

Unfortunately, obtaining the approval of multiple local Institutional Review Boards and consent to contact patients took longer then anticipated. As a result, the survey data constitute a purely cross-sectional study conducted after groups participated in the collaborative. Thus, the higher scores on HRQoL measures for the intervention group cannot be interpreted as an improvement in outcomes. However, the chart review found no differences between the intervention and control groups in

CONCLUSIONS

This BTS collaborative implementing the chronic care model to improve asthma care had a positive impact on important processes of care and patient self-management practices that have previously been linked to improved health outcomes. However, studies that are large enough to see gains in health outcomes from quality improvement may have to be conducted in large health care systems that already have patient consent for quality improvement data collection and electronic clinical data.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We are grateful for the support of The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which funded this work through grants 034984 and 035678.

REFERENCES (35)

  • DoullI et al.

    Descriptive study of cough, wheeze, and school absence in childhood

    Thorax

    (1996)
  • LozanoP et al.

    Health care utilization and cost among children with asthma who were enrolled in a health maintenance organization

    Pediatrics

    (1997)
  • WagnerEH

    Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?

    Eff Clin Pract

    (1998)
  • BerwickDM et al.

    Physicians as leaders in improving health care: a new series in Annals of Internal Medicine

    Ann Intern Med

    (1998)
  • LangleyGJ et al.

    The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance

    (1997)
  • CretinS et al.

    An evaluation of collaborative interventions to improve chronic illness care: framework and study design

    Eval Rev

    (2004)
  • FlammBL et al.

    Reducing cesarean section rates safely: lessons learned from a “breakthrough series” collaborative

    Birth

    (1998)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text