The use of a simulated patient to assess clinical practice in the management of a high risk asthmatic

N Z Med J. 1989 May 24;102(868):252-4.

Abstract

Actors were trained to simulate a young asthmatic woman in the high risk category. Sixty-four of the 195 general practitioners and family medicine registrars in Christchurch city agreed to take part in the study in which they would be consulted by a simulated patient remaining blind to identification of the patient, the time and the medical problem. The simulators were trained to record information from the consultation and rate doctor behaviour when presenting, as a new patient on transfer, for a repeat prescription of asthma medication. Forty-nine doctors had one consultation and of these 25 had a second. Consultation time averaged 15.6 minutes and waiting time 17.4 minutes. Practice nurses and physiotherapists were rarely utilised. There were no specialist referrals. Serum theophylline levels were estimated in 4%. The chest was examined in 39% of consultations, the peak flow in 59%, both in 30% and neither in 32%. Drug prophylaxis was encouraged in 62%, home peak flow meter monitoring was encouraged in 49%, smoking was discouraged in 41%, aerosol technique was checked in 1%, a crisis plan was provided in 57% and asthma education in 42%. Doctor behaviour and communication skills were rated highly except that clear instruction on follow up appointments was given in only 24%. The second consultation appeared to be a briefer rerun of the first, indicating episodic care rather than planned long term management. A number of issues were identified for further study and education.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Asthma / prevention & control
  • Asthma / therapy*
  • Clinical Competence*
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Family Practice
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Medical History Taking
  • Patient Education as Topic
  • Physical Examination
  • Psychodrama*
  • Risk Factors
  • Role Playing*
  • Time Factors