Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief
    • Past Issues in Brief
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
    • Associate Editor Opening
    • Current Opportunities
    • Job Board
  • COVID-19
    • Preprint Collection
    • Casenotes Blog

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief
    • Past Issues in Brief
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
    • Associate Editor Opening
    • Current Opportunities
    • Job Board
  • COVID-19
    • Preprint Collection
    • Casenotes Blog
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleInnovations in Primary Care

Coaching Small Primary Care Practices to Use Patient Portals

Lauren Gritzer, Marsha Davenport, Michael Dark and Niharika Khanna
The Annals of Family Medicine August 2019, 17 (Suppl 1) S83; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2381
Lauren Gritzer
1University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marsha Davenport
2Towson University, Towson, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Dark
1University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Niharika Khanna
1University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nkhanna@som.umaryland.edu
Key words
  • patient portal
  • practice transformation coaching
  • patient and family engagement
  • primary care
  • practice-based research

THE INNOVATION

Patient portals allow both patients and clinicians to share information such as test results, visit summaries, and correspondences. Solo and small primary care practices, however, are challenged with limited resources and with electronic health records (EHRs) that have limited patient portal capabilities. In our project, practice transformation coaches provided one-on-one coaching to these practices to effectively implement patient portals, allowing integration of patient and family feedback into patient-centered care delivery and quality improvement. As a result of these tailored coaching sessions, patient portal use by practice sites increased from 8% to 75% over a 12-month period.

WHO & WHERE

The Garden Practice Transformation Network focused this initiative on solo and small primary care practices having a total of 176 primary care physicians and practitioners representing 21 practices and 25 Federally Qualified Health Center sites in Maryland.

HOW

Through one-on-one coaching with physicians and office staff, we were able to improve patient feedback integration into quality improvement. Coaches began working with practices by increasing awareness of the functional capabilities of a patient portal and the value of engaging their patients in their health care. If a practice was reluctant to spend the funds necessary for the patient portal to become active with 2-way communication capabilities, coaches discussed return on investment with the practice.

Coaches assisted agreeable practices by communicating with the practice’s EHR vendor to ensure the 2-way communication capability was active and that the vendor provided additional technical assistance. Coaches also assisted practices in becoming familiar with their patient portals’ capabilities and disseminating training materials on patient portal use to their patients. Coaches supported practices in developing new workflows to triage messages to physicians and staff for effective care coordination by connecting new or existing e-mail accounts to their patient portals.

Practices were able to successfully use the patient portal for conducting outreach, answering questions, scheduling appointments, refilling medications, delivering immunization reminders, promoting preventive care, and managing chronic disease. Patients were able to communicate with their primary care clinicians through a 24-7 secure portal, request appointments and medication refills, and access their health records. In addition, patients had a communication channel to provide feedback on their practice experience, making them feel respected and heard. Feedback from patients helped practices make quality improvements and engage patients as partners in their care.

LEARNING

Solo and small primary care practices benefit from one-on-one coaching including return on investment conversations to use patient portals in patient engagement. Implementing and optimizing patient portals required practice buy-in and workflow reorganization. A key lesson we learned is that coaching solo or small practices in optimal patient portal use provides a unique opportunity to engage patients as partners in their health care.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest: authors report none.

  • To read or post commentaries in response to this article, see it online at http://www.AnnFamMed.org/content/17/Suppl_1/S83.

  • Funding support: This project was supported by subcontract number NJII 380G15 and funding opportunity number CMS-1L1-15-003 from the US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

  • Disclaimer: The contents provided are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of HHS or any of its agencies.

  • Received for publication September 4, 2018.
  • Revision received October 31, 2018.
  • Accepted for publication December 13, 2018.
  • © 2019 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Online First

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2021 Annals of Family Medicine