Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Long-Term Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Screening Mammography

John Brodersen and Volkert Dirk Siersma
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2013, 11 (2) 106-115; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1466
John Brodersen
Research Unit and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: john.brodersen@sund.ku.dk
Volkert Dirk Siersma
Research Unit and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

PURPOSE Cancer screening programs have the potential of intended beneficial effects, but they also inevitably have unintended harmful effects. In the case of screening mammography, the most frequent harm is a false-positive result. Prior efforts to measure their psychosocial consequences have been limited by short-term follow-up, the use of generic survey instruments, and the lack of a relevant benchmark—women with breast cancer.

METHODS In this cohort study with a 3-year follow-up, we recruited 454 women with abnormal findings in screening mammography over a 1-year period. For each woman with an abnormal finding on a screening mammogram (false and true positives), we recruited another 2 women with normal screening results who were screened the same day at the same clinic. These participants were asked to complete the Consequences of Screening in Breast Cancer—a validated questionnaire encompassing 12 psychosocial outcomes—at baseline, 1, 6, 18, and 36 months.

RESULTS Six months after final diagnosis, women with false-positive findings reported changes in existential values and inner calmness as great as those reported by women with a diagnosis of breast cancer (Δ = 1.15; P = .015; and Δ = 0.13; P = .423, respectively). Three years after being declared free of cancer, women with false-positive results consistently reported greater negative psychosocial consequences compared with women who had normal findings in all 12 psychosocial outcomes (Δ >0 for 12 of 12 outcomes; P <.01 for 4 of 12 outcomes).

CONCLUSION False-positive findings on screening mammography causes long-term psychosocial harm: 3 years after a false-positive finding, women experience psychosocial consequences that range between those experienced by women with a normal mammogram and those with a diagnosis of breast cancer.

Key words
  • mass screening
  • breast cancer
  • false-positive reactions/adverse effects
  • Received for publication March 2, 2012.
  • Revision received June 7, 2012.
  • Accepted for publication September 10, 2012.
  • © 2013 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 11 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 11 (2)
Vol. 11, Issue 2
March/April 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Long-Term Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Screening Mammography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Long-Term Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Screening Mammography
John Brodersen, Volkert Dirk Siersma
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2013, 11 (2) 106-115; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1466

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Long-Term Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Screening Mammography
John Brodersen, Volkert Dirk Siersma
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2013, 11 (2) 106-115; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1466
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Downstream healthcare use following breast cancer screening: a register-based cohort study
  • Screening for breast cancer with mammography
  • Breast density notification
  • Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography: a cohort study with follow-up of 12-14 years in Denmark
  • 'Diagnostic downshift: clinical and system consequences of extrapolating secondary care testing tactics to primary care
  • Short and long-term psychosocial consequences of participating in a colorectal cancer screening programme: a matched longitudinal study
  • Psychosocial consequences of invitation to colorectal cancer screening: a matched cohort study
  • Targeting lung cancer screening to individuals at greatest risk: the role of genetic factors
  • Toward robust mammography-based models for breast cancer risk
  • Physician Perspectives on Mammography Screening for Average-Risk Women: "Like a Double-Edged Sword"
  • Psychosocial consequences of false positives in the Danish Lung Cancer CT Screening Trial: a nested matched cohort study
  • Quality of screening mammography
  • Influence of Mortality on Estimating the Risk of Kidney Failure in People with Stage 4 CKD
  • "A Natural Progression": Australian Women's Attitudes About an Individualized Breast Screening Model
  • Depistage : quand les choses tournent mal
  • Screening: when things go wrong
  • Geographic Variation in Postoperative Imaging for Low-Risk Breast Cancer
  • Factors Associated with False Positive Results on Screening Mammography in a Population of Predominantly Hispanic Women
  • More than half of abnormal results from laboratory tests ordered by family physicians could be false-positive
  • Demandes concurrentielles et possibilites en soins primaires
  • Competing demands and opportunities in primary care
  • Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis
  • Authors reply to Timms and Bird
  • Why cancer screening has never been shown to "save lives"--and what we can do about it
  • Prevalence, Long-term Development, and Predictors of Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Mammography among Women Attending Population-Based Screening
  • Diagnostic Invasiveness and Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Mammography
  • National Expenditure For False-Positive Mammograms And Breast Cancer Overdiagnoses Estimated At $4 Billion A Year
  • People's willingness to accept overdetection in cancer screening: population survey
  • Overdetection in breast cancer screening: development and preliminary evaluation of a decision aid
  • How Well Does Supplemental Screening Magnetic Resonance Imaging Work in High-Risk Women?
  • The effect of information about overdetection of breast cancer on women's decision-making about mammography screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
  • Were Our Estimates of Overdiagnosis With Mammography Screening * in the United States "Based on Faulty Science"?
  • Some more evidence of long-term psychosocial harms from receiving false-positive screening mammography results
  • A false-positive on screening mammography has a negative psychosocial impact up to 3 years after receiving the all clear
  • In This Issue: Finding the Sweet Spot in Health Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
  • Feasibility and Acceptability of the “About Me” Care Card as a Tool for Engaging Older Adults in Conversations About Cognitive Impairment
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Mental health
    • Prevention
  • Person groups:
    • Women's health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods

Keywords

  • mass screening
  • breast cancer
  • false-positive reactions/adverse effects

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine