Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

A Core Outcome Set for Multimorbidity Research (COSmm)

Susan M. Smith, Emma Wallace, Chris Salisbury, Maxime Sasseville, Elizabeth Bayliss and Martin Fortin
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2018, 16 (2) 132-138; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2178
Susan M. Smith
1HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
MD, MSc, MB, BAO, BCh, DCH, MRCPI, MRCGP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emma Wallace
1HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
MB BAO BcH (Hons), BMedSci (Hons), MICGP, PhD, HDip (ClinEd), DCH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Salisbury
2Centre for Academic Primary Care, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
MB, ChB(Bristol), MSc(Lond), DRCOG, FRCGP, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maxime Sasseville
3Department of Health Sciences Research, Research Chair on Chronic Diseases in Primary Care, Chicoutimi (Quebec), Canada
RN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Bayliss
4Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Fortin
5Département de médecine de famille, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke (Québec), Canada
MD, MSc, CMFC(F)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

PURPOSE We aimed to develop a consensus-based set of core outcomes specifically for studies in multimorbidity.

METHODS We undertook a consensus study following the COS-STAR (Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting) guidelines for the design and reporting of core outcome sets. A Delphi panel of experts completed a web-based survey with 2 rounds. Panelists were presented with a range of outcomes that had been identified in previous workshops and a related systematic review. They indicated their level of agreement on whether each outcome should be included in the core set using a 5-point Likert scale, and outcomes reaching a prespecified consensus level were included.

RESULTS Of 30 individuals invited to be panelists, 26 from 13 countries agreed. All 26 completed both rounds of the survey. The Delphi panel reached consensus on 17 outcomes for inclusion in a core outcome set for multimorbidity (COSmm). The highest-ranked outcomes were health-related quality of life, mental health outcomes, and mortality. Other outcomes were grouped into overarching themes of patient-reported impacts and behaviors (treatment burden, self-rated health, self-management behavior, self-efficacy, adherence); physical activity and function (activities of daily living, physical function, physical activity); consultation related (communication, shared decision making, prioritization); and health systems (health care use, costs, quality of health care).

CONCLUSIONS This consensus study involved a wide range of international experts who identified a large number of outcomes for multimorbidity intervention studies. Our results suggest that quality of life, mental health outcomes, and mortality should be regarded as essential core outcomes. Researchers should, however, also consider the full range of outcomes when designing studies to capture important domains in multimorbidity depending on individual study aims and interventions.

  • multimorbidity
  • chronic disease
  • complexity
  • methodology
  • primary care
  • research
  • core outcome set

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest: E.W. is Senior Research Fellow in the HRB Centre for Primary Care Research in Ireland (HRB grant HRC-2014-1); M.F. holds the Research Chair on Chronic Diseases in Primary Care, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada.

  • Author contributions: S.M.S., C.S., L.B., and M.F. conceived the idea for this article. All authors were involved in writing the protocol and the main article, including analysis of the Delphi panel results and commenting on development of the core outcome set at all stages as steering group members.

  • Supplementary materials: Available at http://www.AnnFamMed.org/content/16/2/132/suppl/DC1/.

  • Received for publication May 20, 2017.
  • Revision received September 12, 2017.
  • Accepted for publication October 15, 2017.
  • © 2018 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 16 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 16 (2)
Vol. 16, Issue 2
March/April 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Core Outcome Set for Multimorbidity Research (COSmm)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
18 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A Core Outcome Set for Multimorbidity Research (COSmm)
Susan M. Smith, Emma Wallace, Chris Salisbury, Maxime Sasseville, Elizabeth Bayliss, Martin Fortin
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2018, 16 (2) 132-138; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2178

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
A Core Outcome Set for Multimorbidity Research (COSmm)
Susan M. Smith, Emma Wallace, Chris Salisbury, Maxime Sasseville, Elizabeth Bayliss, Martin Fortin
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2018, 16 (2) 132-138; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2178
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Strengthening transparency in randomised trials related to multimorbidity: key points and recommendations to guide reporting
  • Reporting of pre-existing multiple long-term conditions in physical rehabilitation for long COVID: a scoping review
  • Core outcome sets for trials of interventions to prevent and to treat multimorbidity in adults in low and middle-income countries: the COSMOS study
  • Intervention strategies for management of comorbid depression among individuals with hypertension: a scoping review protocol
  • Core outcome sets for trials of interventions to prevent and to treat multimorbidity in low- and middle-income countries: the COSMOS study
  • Protocol for a cluster randomised trial of a goal-oriented care approach for multimorbidity patients supported by a digital platform
  • How can we fund research for people, not conditions?
  • Effect of social prescribing link workers on health outcomes and costs for adults in primary care and community settings: a systematic review
  • Multimorbidity patterns and the relation to self-rated health among older Japanese people: a nationwide cross-sectional study
  • Association between multimorbidity, self-rated health and life satisfaction among independent, community-dwelling very old persons in Japan: longitudinal cohort analysis from the Kawasaki Ageing and Well-being Project
  • Development of a core outcome set for multimorbidity trials in low/middle-income countries (COSMOS): study protocol
  • Associations of primary care structures with polypharmacy and patient-reported indicators in patients with complex multimorbidity: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan
  • Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for studies of pregnant women with pre-existing multimorbidity
  • Effect of multimorbidity patterns on the decline in health-related quality of life: a nationwide prospective cohort study in Japan
  • Systematic review on the instruments used for measuring the association of the level of multimorbidity and clinically important outcomes
  • Development of a core outcome set for multimorbidity trials in low- and middle-income countries (COSMOS): Study Protocol
  • Integrating clinical pharmacists within general practice: protocol for a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
  • Link workers providing social prescribing and health and social care coordination for people with multimorbidity in socially deprived areas (the LinkMM trial): protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
  • The multimorbidity dead end: how we got here and possible ways out
  • Systematic review of international Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: representation of international patients
  • Critical review of multimorbidity outcome measures suitable for low-income and middle-income country settings: perspectives from the Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases (GACD) researchers
  • Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for reporting outcomes of management of velopharyngeal dysfunction
  • Priorities of patients with multimorbidity and of clinicians regarding treatment and health outcomes: a systematic mixed studies review
  • Physical multimorbidity patterns and depressive symptoms: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan
  • Core Principles to Improve Primary Care Quality Management
  • In This Issue: Refining Care and its Frameworks
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
    • Mental health
  • Person groups:
    • Older adults
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other topics:
    • Research capacity building
    • Multimorbidity

Keywords

  • multimorbidity
  • chronic disease
  • complexity
  • methodology
  • primary care
  • research
  • core outcome set

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine