|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Clinical Decision Support, WELLINX, St. Louis, Mo
2 Affinity Health System, Menasha, Wis
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: S. Troy McMullin, PharmD, 10426 Baur Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63132, tmcmullin{at}wellinx.com
PURPOSE Although newer, heavily promoted medications are commonly prescribed, published evidence and consensus guidelines often support the use of less expensive alternatives. This study was designed to evaluate the impact on prescription costs of a computerized decision support system (CDSS) that provides evidence-based recommendations to clinicians during the electronic prescribing process.
METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed using a pharmacy claims database. Clinicians using the CDSS were matched with a control group by pharmacy billed amount, number of patients treated, and number of new prescriptions filled during a 6-month baseline period in which neither group used the system. The primary outcome measure was the difference in prescription costs between the 2 groups after implementation of the CDSS in the intervention group.
RESULTS Clinicians who received evidence-based messages had significantly lower prescription costs than those in the control group. The average cost per new prescription was $4.16 lower (P = .02) in the intervention group, and the average cost for new and refilled prescriptions was $4.99 lower (P = .01). The 6-month savings from new prescriptions and their refills are estimated to be $3,450 (95% CI, $1,030-$5,863) per clinician.
CONCLUSIONS Providing electronic, evidence-based decision support during the prescribing process can shift prescribing decisions toward more evidence-based care and significantly decrease primary care prescription costs.
Key Words: Decision support systems, clinical medical records systems, computerized ambulatory care information systems clinical pharmacy information systems medical decision making, computer assisted medical informatics applications drug utilization drug therapy, computer assisted
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Varonen, T. Kortteisto, M. Kaila, and for the EBMeDS Study Group What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): a focus group study with physicians Fam. Pract., June 1, 2008; 25(3): 162 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Eslami, A. Abu-Hanna, and N. F. de Keizer Evaluation of Outpatient Computerized Physician Medication Order Entry Systems: A Systematic Review J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2007; 14(4): 400 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Gerstle, C. U. Lehmann, and the Council on Clinical Information Technology Electronic Prescribing Systems in Pediatrics: The Rationale and Functionality Requirements Pediatrics, June 1, 2007; 119(6): e1413 - e1422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L Harris, D. W Raisch, U. Abhyankar, S. Marfatia, H. M Campbell, and M. R Sather GI Risk Factors and Use of GI Protective Agents Among Patients Receiving Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs Ann. Pharmacother., November 1, 2006; 40(11): 1924 - 1931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Stange In this Issue: The Patient-Clinician Relationship and Practice-Based Network Research Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2004; 2(5): 386 - 387. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all TRACK Comments
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |