HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) In Brief TRACK Comments: Submit a response TRACK Comments: View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zayas, L. H. Articles by Jankowski, K. R. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zayas, L. H. Articles by Jankowski, K. R. B.

Adapting Psychosocial Intervention Research to Urban Primary Care Environments: A Case Example

¹ Center for Mental Health Services Research, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mo
² Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
³ Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, NY

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Luis H. Zayas, PhD, Center for Mental Health Services Research George Warren Brown School of Social Work Washington University in St. Louis One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196 St. Louis, MO 63130–4899 lzayas{at}wustl.edu

PURPOSE We wanted to describe the unique issues encountered by our research team in testing an intervention to reduce perinatal depression in real-world community health centers.

METHOD We used a case study of an experience in conducting a randomized controlled trial designed to test the effectiveness of a low-cost multimodal psychosocial intervention to reduce prenatal and postpartum depression. Low-income minority women (N = 187) with low-risk pregnancies were randomly assigned to the intervention or treatment as usual. Outcomes of interest were depressive symptoms and social support assessed at 3 months’ postpartum.

RESULTS Our intervention was not associated with changes in depressive symptoms or social support. Challenges in implementation were related to participant retention and intervention delivery. Turnover of student therapists affected continuity in participant-therapist relationships and created missed opportunities to deliver the intervention. The academic-community partnership that was formed also required more involvement of health center personnel to facilitate ownership at the site level, especially for fidelity monitoring. While attentive to cultural sensitivity, the project called for more collaboration with participants to define common goals and outcomes. Participatory research strategies could have anticipated barriers to uptake of the intervention and achieved a better match between outcomes desired by researchers and those of participants.

CONCLUSION Several criteria for future research planning emerged: assessing what the population is willing and able to accept, considering what treatment providers can be expected to implement, assessing the setting’s capacity to accommodate intervention research, and collecting and using emerging unanticipated data.

Key Words: Psychosocial treatment • intervention research, primary health care • perinatal depression • mental health

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. C. Stange In this Issue: The Patient-Clinician Relationship and Practice-Based Network Research Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2004; 2(5): 386 - 387. [Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments: