Annals of Family Medicine Annals Impact Factor is 4.5
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Annals of Family Medicine 2:576-582 (2004)
© 2004 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.245

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental data: Appendix
Right arrow In Brief
Right arrow TRACK Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow TRACK Comments: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borrell-Carrió, F.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Borrell-Carrió, F.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, R. M.

The Biopsychosocial Model 25 Years Later: Principles, Practice, and Scientific Inquiry

Francesc Borrell-Carrió, MD1, Anthony L. Suchman, MD2,3 and Ronald M. Epstein, MD4

1 Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, CAP Cornellà, Catalonian Institute of Health (ICS), Cornellà de Llobregat, Spain
2 Relationship Centered Health Care, Rochester, NY
3 Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
4 Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Francesc Borrell-Carrió, MD, Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, CAP Cornellà, Catalonian Institute of Health (ICS), C/Bellaterra 39, 08940 Cornellà de Llobregat, Spain, 12902fbc{at}comb.es

The biopsychosocial model is both a philosophy of clinical care and a practical clinical guide. Philosophically, it is a way of understanding how suffering, disease, and illness are affected by multiple levels of organization, from the societal to the molecular. At the practical level, it is a way of understanding the patient’s subjective experience as an essential contributor to accurate diagnosis, health outcomes, and humane care. In this article, we defend the biopsychosocial model as a necessary contribution to the scientific clinical method, while suggesting 3 clarifications: (1) the relationship between mental and physical aspects of health is complex—subjective experience depends on but is not reducible to laws of physiology; (2) models of circular causality must be tempered by linear approximations when considering treatment options; and (3) promoting a more participatory clinician-patient relationship is in keeping with current Western cultural tendencies, but may not be universally accepted. We propose a biopsychosocial-oriented clinical practice whose pillars include (1) self-awareness; (2) active cultivation of trust; (3) an emotional style characterized by empathic curiosity; (4) self-calibration as a way to reduce bias; (5) educating the emotions to assist with diagnosis and forming therapeutic relationships; (6) using informed intuition; and (7) communicating clinical evidence to foster dialogue, not just the mechanical application of protocol. In conclusion, the value of the biopsychosocial model has not been in the discovery of new scientific laws, as the term "new paradigm" would suggest, but rather in guiding parsimonious application of medical knowledge to the needs of each patient.

Key Words: Biopsychosocial model • clinical practice patterns • personal autonomy • empathy • communication • education




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
J. P. Meza and G. F. Fahoome
The Development of an Instrument for Measuring Healing
Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2008; 6(4): 355 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
New Opportunities for Dentistry in Diagnosis and Primary Health Care: Report of Panel 1 of the Macy Study
J Dent Educ., February 1, 2008; 72(2_suppl): 66 - 72.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
L. L. Berry, J. T. Parish, R. Janakiraman, L. Ogburn-Russell, G. R. Couchman, W. L. Rayburn, and J. Grisel
Patients' Commitment to Their Primary Physician and Why It Matters
Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2008; 6(1): 6 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. A. Bardwell, L. Natarajan, J. E. Dimsdale, C. L. Rock, J. E. Mortimer, K. Hollenbach, and J. P. Pierce
Objective Cancer-Related Variables Are Not Associated With Depressive Symptoms in Women Treated for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2006; 24(16): 2420 - 2427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
J. C. Frich, L. Ose, K. Malterud, and P. Fugelli
Perceived Vulnerability to Heart Disease in Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Qualitative Interview Study
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2006; 4(3): 198 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
"Our community of reflective practitioners will continue its quest informed...."
Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2005; 3(1): 86 - 87.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
In This Issue: New Model Finances, Systematic Reviews, Patients and Health Care
Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2004; 2(6): 530 - 531.
[Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments:

Read all TRACK Comments

Perambulations on: “The Biopsychosocial Model 25 Years Later
Eugene S. Farley
Annals of Family Medicine, 3 Dec 2004 [Full text]
Engel's Legacy
Diego Gracia
Annals of Family Medicine, 5 Dec 2004 [Full text]
Welcome contribution
Shmuel Reis
Annals of Family Medicine, 6 Dec 2004 [Full text]
A New Model of Family Medicine is needed to reactivate the Biopsychosocial Model
Joseph E Scherger
Annals of Family Medicine, 7 Dec 2004 [Full text]
Tools for the job
Tomi Spenser
Annals of Family Medicine, 11 Dec 2004 [Full text]
Response to Dr Farley
Francesc Borrell-Carrio, et al.
Annals of Family Medicine, 17 Dec 2004 [Full text]
Response to Professor Diego Gracia.
Francesc Borrell-Carrió, et al.
Annals of Family Medicine, 17 Dec 2004 [Full text]
Response to Dr Shmuel Reis
Francesc Borrell-Carrio, et al.
Annals of Family Medicine, 17 Dec 2004 [Full text]
Response to Drs Spenser and Scherger
Ronald M Epstein, et al.
Annals of Family Medicine, 17 Dec 2004 [Full text]
Comment on "The Biopsychosocial Model 25 Years Later..."
Jack H. Medalie
Annals of Family Medicine, 21 Dec 2004 [Full text]
Progressing Engel's biopsychosocial model of health
Joachim P Sturmberg, et al.
Annals of Family Medicine, 26 Dec 2004 [Full text]
A Sense of Imminent Progess
Larry A Green
Annals of Family Medicine, 2 Jan 2005 [Full text]
more family physicians in Brazil
Elson Romeu Farias
Annals of Family Medicine, 3 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Response to Drs Medalie, Sturmberg and Green
Ronald M Epstein, et al.
Annals of Family Medicine, 4 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Magnificent Article!
Robert A. Weissberg
Annals of Family Medicine, 9 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Reflecting on Our Own Biopsychosocial Progress
John P. Zubialde
Annals of Family Medicine, 11 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Response to Dr Farley
Cici B. Asplund, MD
Annals of Family Medicine, 29 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Epistemology, politics, emotions and counter transference: Around “The Biopsychosocial Model 25 Years Later: Principles, Practice and Scientific Inquiry”.
Jorge L. Tizón
Annals of Family Medicine, 17 Mar 2005 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Annals of Family Medicine.